• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • The 2024 Styleforum and Epaulet Alpaca Project

    For the third year in a row, we're thrilled to partner with @Epaulet to bring you an exclusive collection of luxurious sweaters, hats, jackets, and blankets in Peruvian Alpaca.

    Details can be found here

    The Styleforum Team.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Soft vs Structured Tailoring

jdp234

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
1,178
Reaction score
4,369
Are their any photos to dileneate what represents structured vs soft tailoring? I have seen some suits that are considered softly tailored that still have a structured look to it.

This is a good point—Steven (sp?) Hitchcock springs to mind as a tailor who is working in the “soft” style (*for England*) but still makes jackets that to my eye look quite clean and angular.

I guess I just don’t have as good a sense, not having ever handled jackets from eg Huntsman or Sexton or similarly “hard” tailoring firms.

As a general matter I have started to believe that the SF mean is too heavily biased in favor of soft and unstructured/unpadded jackets.
 

Quesjac

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Messages
856
Reaction score
637
This is a good point—Steven (sp?) Hitchcock springs to mind as a tailor who is working in the “soft” style (*for England*) but still makes jackets that to my eye look quite clean and angular.

I guess I just don’t have as good a sense, not having ever handled jackets from eg Huntsman or Sexton or similarly “hard” tailoring firms.

As a general matter I have started to believe that the SF mean is too heavily biased in favor of soft and unstructured/unpadded jackets.
Obviously you get a much better sense from trying things on, but even photos of two extremes, say isaia and cifonelli, give a good sense of the difference I think.

To my mind all good jackets have shape, it's more that some get it from how they fall over the body and some much more from padding etc
 

lordsuperb

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
9,176
Reaction score
13,024
This is a good point—Steven (sp?) Hitchcock springs to mind as a tailor who is working in the “soft” style (*for England*) but still makes jackets that to my eye look quite clean and angular.

I guess I just don’t have as good a sense, not having ever handled jackets from eg Huntsman or Sexton or similarly “hard” tailoring firms.

As a general matter I have started to believe that the SF mean is too heavily biased in favor of soft and unstructured/unpadded jackets.

Because it feels like you are wearing nothing at ALL......
 

sargeinaz

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Messages
533
Reaction score
356
I Agree. I hate feeling padding in the shoulders. I also don’t wear suits often (basically weddings or funerals), mostly casual sport coats.

I’d be interested to try on a liverano or vestrucci jacket because from what I understand they use very light wadding or padding (I forget) that’s much less noticeable.
 

lordsuperb

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
9,176
Reaction score
13,024
I Agree. I hate feeling padding in the shoulders. I also don’t wear suits often (basically weddings or funerals), mostly casual sport coats.

I’d be interested to try on a liverano or vestrucci jacket because from what I understand they use very light wadding or padding (I forget) that’s much less noticeable.

There is probably little to no padding in these but they still give off a structured vibe. What gives?

91978707_6a00d83455d78069e2014e88dd826e970d-pi.jpeg


1000-1.jpeg

4f02a790_FullSizeRender302.jpeg
500x1000px-LL-44b1f491_FullSizeRender68.jpeg


IMG_6693.JPG


p1020357mz4.28871733_std.jpg
 
Last edited:

vida

Senior Member
Joined
May 6, 2010
Messages
771
Reaction score
355
Structured tailoring, in general, comes across as a more formal and business-like. And given that the climate continues to get more and more casual, soft tailoring just seems more appropriate.
My PLPL suits have plenty of shape and structure but are rarely worn because I feel very "dressed", even at work among professionals. So, I've turned to soft models (Isaia, etc.) that are more in line with current standards. However, I believe that structured jackets are a better compliment to my physique in many ways, yet I still choose softer garments a majority of the time.
 

lordsuperb

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
9,176
Reaction score
13,024
Structured tailoring, in general, comes across as a more formal and business-like. And given that the climate continues to get more and more casual, soft tailoring just seems more appropriate.
My PLPL suits have plenty of shape and structure but are rarely worn because I feel very "dressed", even at work among professionals. So, I've turned to soft models (Isaia, etc.) that are more in line with current standards. However, I believe that structured jackets are a better compliment to my physique in many ways, yet I still choose softer garments a majority of the time.

Like so?
500x1000px-LL-9bc9cbe6_firstday.jpeg
 

clee1982

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
29,525
Reaction score
25,513
I prefer structured, probably because I got small ish frame (5’7”, 145lb). Also I think most people have some slight imbalance between shoulder, a bit padding (still not structured look at all) goes a long way to fix all the small divet what not issue.
 

comrade

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 10, 2005
Messages
9,257
Reaction score
2,483
Examples from Rubinacci and Kiton of very soft tailoring and rounded shoulder
line not evident on the photos above. To my eyes this rounded shoulder
is basically the same as traditional Ivy League tailoring. I have broad
and square shoulders and a big chest, so this shoulder suits me.

http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/07...re_Linen_Silk_Jacket_2_large.JPG?v=1459952996

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0...ket_EU_54_US_44_Slim_1_large.jpg?v=1473236916

Ivy example:

http://www.oconnellsclothing.com/O-Connell-s-Robert-Noble-Plaid-Tweed-Sport-Coat-Tan.html
 
Last edited:

jonathanS

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2013
Messages
3,184
Reaction score
1,821
Examples from Rubinacci and Kiton of very soft tailoring and rounded shoulder
line not evident on the photos above. To my eyes this rounded shoulder
is basically the same as traditional Ivy League tailoring. I have broad
and square shoulders and a big chest, so this shoulder suits me.

http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/07...re_Linen_Silk_Jacket_2_large.JPG?v=1459952996

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0...ket_EU_54_US_44_Slim_1_large.jpg?v=1473236916

Ivy example:

http://www.oconnellsclothing.com/O-Connell-s-Robert-Noble-Plaid-Tweed-Sport-Coat-Tan.html


Its clear the Rubinacci is much better than the Kiton & the Ivy imo.

Kiton button stance is too high to my eye - its right under the chest, which does nothing to accentuate the figure.
 

comrade

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 10, 2005
Messages
9,257
Reaction score
2,483
I agree re button stance but my comment is on the shoulders on the prior examples,
none of which are "natural" enough for me
 
Last edited:

Bromley

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2015
Messages
1,046
Reaction score
2,322
There is probably little to no padding in these but they still give off a structured vibe. What gives?

View attachment 950826

View attachment 950827
View attachment 950828 View attachment 950829

View attachment 950839

View attachment 950843
Most of those jackets fit really well-- clean lines, no folds or bunching cloth. Maybe that's why you're getting the impression of structure. I think "soft tailoring" becomes more apparent in movement, or in poor fit. There are certain details that have become associated with "soft tailoring" as well (drape, shoulder shapes, sleeve attachment, etc). Reliably or not, I associate a trim chest/roped shoulder/ticket pocket with "structured tailoring". Those details nudge my impression, anyway.
 

Featured Sponsor

Do you coordinate your watch strap with your shoes or belt?

  • Always

  • Sometimes

  • Never

  • I don't pay attention


Results are only viewable after voting.

Forum statistics

Threads
515,455
Messages
10,675,655
Members
227,008
Latest member
Sohail sG
Top