Size vs. Cost

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by swiego, Dec 17, 2011.

  1. Reborn

    Reborn Senior member

    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    9
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    

    Price for the average and make up the loss(xxl) and gain(xs) from each end.

    How is this so hard to understand?

    You're suggesting:
    XS-$8
    M-$10
    XXL-$12

    Real world:
    XS-$10
    M-$10
    XXL-$10

    Either way you wind up with $30. The athletic 1% are subsidizing the fat ass 99%.
     


  2. unbelragazzo

    unbelragazzo Jewfro Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    8,365
    Likes Received:
    4,552
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    Lol Reborn think this through man. By your logic, McDs should charge same for single double and triple cheeseburgers since it all evens out. So question is why doesn't some maker come out offering lower prices for smaller sizes and thereby grab more of that market. My guess is not wanting to alienate bigger sizes and not wanting to make their customers feel too price conscious.
     


  3. Nicola

    Nicola Senior member

    Messages:
    2,952
    Likes Received:
    43
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    

    It's like saying the people who use more ketchup on their fries should pay more then those who don't use any.

    How much difference in material cost do you think there is between a S and a XL?
     


  4. swiego

    swiego Senior member

    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    22
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    

    For a JC Penney sweater? A dollar or two.

    For one of the highly sought after SF-approved Italian sweaters? Potentially $100 or more.
     


  5. sns23

    sns23 Senior member

    Messages:
    460
    Likes Received:
    15
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    

    or a size 30 v. 44 alligator belt.
     


  6. marblehouse

    marblehouse Senior member

    Messages:
    1,708
    Likes Received:
    533
    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Location:
    never odd or even
    I don't think you've seriously thought this through. Pricing is clearly more sophisticated than a reflection of actual material costs.

    Moreover, there is example of this: tailors charge by the yard for suits and much taller larger members will have to pay (slightly) more for their materials.

    On a macro level, the marginal difference in material costs is more than made up by not having to deal with the potential backlash of charging more for "plus" sizes. If you don't think so, I suggest you approach an airline and ask them to start charging for tickets based on passenger weight.
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2011


  7. sns23

    sns23 Senior member

    Messages:
    460
    Likes Received:
    15
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    

    I wish airlines did. It costs an airline 30,000 per year for every extra pound they carry on each flight
     


  8. phoenixrecon

    phoenixrecon Senior member

    Messages:
    2,441
    Likes Received:
    27
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Location:
    In some dude's court
    you sound like you know a lot about business and retail in general. I will be subscribing an RSS feed to your posts for future economic topics.
     


  9. bubbleboys

    bubbleboys Senior member

    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    

    ^good post

    Pricing is completely not dependent on actual cost.
    It's based on how much someone is willing to pay.
    Competition drives the price people are willing to pay down.

    It really boils down to, how many people are going to stop buying from any brand that doesn't differentiate pricing based on size?
    That number is really small. For the most part, people prefer simplicity in pricing.

    For the lower quality/cost materials, the material cost is such a small part of the actual cost of the garment

    Here's a short and incomplete list of the additional costs incurred in bringing that product to you
    Fabric
    Labor
    Shipping
    Packaging
    Overhead for the factory
    Opportunity cost of using that floor space to display and sell the product
    The interest cost of holding X amount in inventory (unsold inventory sitting on a shelf or in the backroom is literally money sitting there depreciating in value faster than the rate of inflation, compare that to what you could make if you even let that money sit in an interest bearing savings account, those two things added together are the interest cost, the actual term eludes me for the time being)

    Those additional costs for the product don't go away just because the material is more expensive. It just shifts the numbers around, but you'd be surprised how much all these additional costs add to the price of the product.

    Not to mention, if you're picking the really expensive fabric for use in, say for example, a custom suit, I highly doubt you're going to care about saving $20 on a $1000+ suit.
    You have enough money to buy such expensive and nice things, you stop caring about the cents and start focusing on the dollars.
     


  10. ballmouse

    ballmouse Senior member

    Messages:
    1,117
    Likes Received:
    277
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Having customers realize that the manufacturer can make prices cheaper is not the mindset the manufacturer wants its customers to have.
     


  11. saiyar1

    saiyar1 Senior member

    Messages:
    414
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    You're thinking of this all wrong. Regardless of whether it's clothing from a low end or high end brand, almost everyone has thought of how to strategically get the most out of any material they buy.

    Lots of companies employ strategy consultants to maximize the use of cloth and other materials. This is not like a tailor on saville row.... you don't bring him a 5 yard roll of cloth and he uses it to make YOUR suit and the rest if thrown out. If a piece of clothing is being designed, then each inch of cloth is being used to make whatever piece can possibly be made. Remember they are making hundreds of the design, so they can figure out how to strategically place the pieces to cut out of the roll of cloth (which they probably order thousands of yards of). Anything else is bad business and flat out stupid. This is not a hobby.that companies do out of the love. They are trying to make a dollar. It's sometimes hard to step back and look at reality when we're so caught up in a personal interest/hobby of clothing.

    Besides that, unless we're talking about a truly truly bespoke or handmade experience, the material is a small part of the final cost. A lot of these brands charge a premium for brand, even if they make very good quality stuff.
     


  12. saiyar1

    saiyar1 Senior member

    Messages:
    414
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    

    Not not really. But I see the people in charge of marketing for the Italian sweaters have done a good job. And yes, the reputation they have is most definitely marketing... marketing isn't just a tv commerical and a celebrity wearing your product.
     


  13. swiego

    swiego Senior member

    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    22
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    

    Then so has this forum, which is replete with statements about well-made clothing being expensive because they use "higher quality materials." But now these higher quality materials aren't really a factor in the cost? Which is it? When someone here says you have to pay a minimum $400 to get a good quality cashmere sweater, and how the $100 sweater will pill horribly, are they talking about the seams being the cause of the pilling? The label? The bag it shipped in? Or are they talking about the fabric? If so, is the fabric really that much more costly, or are the people on SF who insist that only a $400 sweater will last nothing but a bunch of uneducated liars?

    Please, educate me, how much does the fabric cost?
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2011


  14. mlongano

    mlongano Senior member

    Messages:
    303
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    

    A typical retailer may price a suit with higher grade wool $500.00 or more above the price of a suit made from the "standard" fabric. The additional cost of that wool is most likely less than $50.00.

    This is one of the major reasons I like to use a custom tailor who will quote a CTM price while I supply the fabric. I've had suits made from Fox Flannel, Huddersfield, Minnis, Harrington, and others. I don't believe I've ever paid more than about $250.00 per suit for the fabric, and in some cases it was less than $100.00.
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2011


  15. bubbleboys

    bubbleboys Senior member

    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    

    These are a few reasons why that $400 sweater costs more than that $100

    • Craftsmanship (I have no idea what pilling is, but I suspect it has something to do with needing more skill to sew or use a more intricate and involved sewing method)
      If it takes more time, you pay extra. If it takes more skill, you pay extra.
    • Small overall quantities being manufactured (people usually go into business to make money, while the high quality sweater may only cost an extra $50 to make, they may need to charge an extra $300 to make a comparable profit)
      100,000 JC Penney sweaters manufactured x $50 profit each = $5,000,000 of profit
      1,000 High end sweaters manufactured x $300 profit each = $300,000 profit
      If they sold the high end sweater at $50 profit each, the business owners would only make a measly $50,000 (which really is chump change when you get into any sort of manufacturing)
    • The company's motto is selling luxury. Luxury is inherently linked to the price you pay for goods and also the rarity of said good. If Lamborghinis were suddenly to start selling for say $40,000, people would probably start thinking it wasn't a super luxury vehicle. If I can find this business case study, I'll post it up for those interested; it's about BMW and how they are starting to lose their previous "luxury" status. Long story short, BMW has had a hell of a time maintaining their luxury status with the very success of their company and their products, namely the 3 series. Every Tom, Dick, and Harry has a BMW 3 series car to the point where their status as a luxury car is really in question.

    Ultimately, the $400 sweater costs $400 because that is the market price for that particular product. There are enough people out there who will buy a $400 sweater because SF approves of it, as a status symbol, etc. or even just because they have the money.

    The beauty of a free market is that if you feel that $400 for a non-pilling sweater made with the finest cashmere is way too much money, then start up a company and sell that $400 sweater for $200, or even less.
    I'm sure what you'll find is that you either won't be able to make a healthy profit off the sweaters, you'll have difficulty selling it as a high quality item/luxury, or you'll simply start feeling you should be paid more for your hard work and thus the price will raise.

    PS This wasn't a long explanation; I could easily write a 10 page analysis on why a $400 sweater costs that much without even needing to rely on any sources and just using logical business concepts, some of which I've described.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by