• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Size 6-7 non AE dress shoes under 300

dunelly

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
446
Reaction score
5
I've always thought AEs were a little clunky, is there any sleeker UK brands for under $300.

I'm a 6.5 D so buying used is literally impossible. It'd be my first dress shoe, so I guess or burgundy/dark brown would be nice. I know black is standard but I doubt most interviewers will notice + I prefer brown shoes for going out. Thanks.
 

Bentley

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2009
Messages
443
Reaction score
25
Loakes are nice although I don't know if they are that much sleeker that AE's.
 

Thanks SF (a new me)

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2011
Messages
1,365
Reaction score
259
Originally Posted by Bentley
Loakes are nice although I don't know if they are that much sleeker that AE's.

I guess it depends on the style you are looking for. For example, I think the Loake 1880 Savoy is sleeker than a comparable AE model (0 last?) IMO...
smile.gif

http://www.herringshoes.co.uk/produc...electedFitID=0
 

Thanks SF (a new me)

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2011
Messages
1,365
Reaction score
259
Originally Posted by dunelly
I've always thought AEs were a little clunky, is there any sleeker UK brands for under $300.
I'm a 6.5 D so buying used is literally impossible. It'd be my first dress shoe, so I guess or burgundy/dark brown would be nice. I know black is standard but I doubt most interviewers will notice + I prefer brown shoes for going out. Thanks.


I feel you OP with 6.5D .

I am 5-6 and normally wear 6.5 or 7 US, depending on the style/last..IMO, having a sleeker than normal shoe profile makes me shorter (or Elf like
laugh.gif
) Have you tried the Strand in drk brown or Walnut? Is this for business/suiting or casual wear?
 

ktrp

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
441
Reaction score
15
Lower end of UK shoes would be in reach.

I would guess you'll never be entirely satisfied by the sleekness of your shoes in a size 6.5. AE (proudly) use a 365 welt, which means the area around the heel is a little more substantial then on shoes where the welt is only around the front 2/3 of the shoe. As for the lasts, some of them are 'chunkier' then others. I have one pair of AE's, and another difference I'd note from a pair of Loakes and Barkers that I own is that the toe cap seems shorter on the AE, which I think makes them look a little 'stubbier'. Note however that I wear a US 11 to 11.5, so the proportions and look may be different for you.

If you _really_ want something more 'sleek', you might want to look for something not goodyear welted at all. I don't have any experience with blake rapid construction, but it might look more 'sleek'. The 'forum special' on the R.M. Williams boot thread, while a chelsea boot, is 'sleeker' then any shoe I've ever worn.

While I enjoy my tan shoes more then my black ones, to me, not having a black dress shoe in your wardrobe is a serious issue. Wearing an ugly ill fitting suit will indeed slip by most interviewers, but there are still people in north america who look down on non-black shoes with suits. (In the U.K., it would be far stricter even).

Unless you are interviewing for positions as a farmer.
 

fss

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
83
Reaction score
1
How's the quality of Herring's own shoes? This one is fairly sleek IMO. Or perhaps this captoe?
 

dunelly

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
446
Reaction score
5
I'll be wearing it with a navy suit for entry teaching positions. I guess I need a black pair . Everyone here wears square toes + I just know that I'll wear the dark brown much more afterwards. I like those Loakes posted in mahogany.
Loake-Loake%20Savoy-Mahogany%20Burnished%20Calf-956-541-1_med.jpg
How is the quality of loakes? Would these in black be formal enough for interviews? Would raising the limit to $500 make a difference in shoe quality? Thanks guys.
 

NotoriousMarquis

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
886
Reaction score
28
I really liked Loakes and they way the looked ONLINE, and when I went to london and saw a bunch in person, they looked clunkier and not that sexy. Of course there is the possibility that it was just what I saw, but I also saw a good number of them.
I think some of the AE shoes in walnut calf are really great looking, and sleek.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 41 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.5%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,918
Messages
10,592,668
Members
224,336
Latest member
SightAustraliaRe
Top