ColdEyedPugilist
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2011
- Messages
- 1,667
- Reaction score
- 2,071
Go forth with my blessing, grasshopper.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
i'm with the cold one. but it's not an sf problem but internet-wide. it's something we deal with daily where i work ... read the comments at the end of most newspaper stories and it makes CE look like romper room. as someone who has written for a living all my life, under a byline, it would never occur to me to post something in a public place that i wouldn't want to be associated with. actually that's probably the only thing that keeps me that keeps me from being a raging *sshole. (or even more of one).
Don't ever read the tabloids in England if you love impartial well-sourced information..
yeah, but we don't have Page 3 girls.
This is, without a doubt, the most fucktarded justification I have ever seen for enforcing a ban in my life. If he made a new account to circumvent his ban, and then returned to the same abusive misbehavior he was banned for, this would be an absolutely reasonable reaction. Instead, because some poster with sway got butthurt over a stupid conversation about a TV show in which some childish insults were exchanged, you "realized this", and now an otherwise excellent contributor is banned and not returning to the site. I don't know if any of you mods ever visit or give two ***** about the thrift store bragging thread (you know, one of the largest and most popular threads on this site), but Valium/Frenchy/Frenchytoo was, without a doubt, one of the best (if not THE best) consistent contributor of amazing finds to that thread in recent memory. He added immense value to that thread and to the overall site on balance (even considering his penchant for boorish language), that for the banhammer to be so flagrantly abused by both the mod and the complaining poster over a trivial personal grievance is pathetic and shameful.
i'm with the cold one. but it's not an sf problem but internet-wide. it's something we deal with daily where i work ... read the comments at the end of most newspaper stories and it makes CE look like romper room. as someone who has written for a living all my life, under a byline, it would never occur to me to post something in a public place that i wouldn't want to be associated with. actually that's probably the only thing that keeps me that keeps me from being a raging *sshole. (or even more of one).
SPAM -
Roofing contractor spamming in General Chat.
Doesn't he know that 94 percent of SFers live in condos?
but that leaves no room for the 1%
Alas, I turn into a pumpkin on SF at midnight tonight.
I gave the windmill a good go, but it didn't work.
Sleep well, you bozos.
There are 2 criteria for entry into the group. The first is that we feel that the members have made and are making good contributions to the forum. The second is that they serve as good examples and role models within the community and that I could trust to not abuse their mod like privileges (in other words, they would not delete posts that merely piss them off, or that they find ignorant or belligerent, etc... only posts that actively derail the conversation, etc... Both criteria are of equal value to us. Note that they do not have to agree with me on all topics, including topics about the direction of the forum.
I think people here take everything way too personally.
Wait one damn minute. This guy claims to "write" for a living, but can't find the shift key. What a turkey head.