1. Hi. We moved systems, and because it was impossible to achieve feature parity between the systems, we opted to archive the old B&S threads but allow users to read them so that they can put them into our new B&S system.

    There is a support thread if you have any issues.

    Cheers,

    Fok.

shoe trees! save a whole $8, thanks to our tanking economy!

Discussion in 'B&S Archive' started by The_Foxx, Apr 5, 2006.

  1. The_Foxx

    The_Foxx Senior member

    Messages:
    3,903
    Likes Received:
    1,910
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2002
    Location:
    Northern VA, USA
    stupid US dollar!!! the british pound is killing us, at about $1.75 per, so we'd only save a measly eight dollars by buying these lobb shoe trees from this excellent seller (retail is $120 including shipping from NYC). damnit.

    http://cgi.ebay.com/Brand-New-John-L...QQcmdZViewItem
     


  2. mbc

    mbc Senior member

    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Location:
    New York, NY
    Serious question: In what ways are these superior to $20 Woodlore combination shoe trees? I read the bit about the "double tubes"... anything else? Not a criticism, but genuine curiousity.
     


  3. Roger

    Roger Senior member

    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2005
    Location:
    Vancouver
    In my opinion, the double spring tubes don't constitute much of an advantage at all over the single-spring Woodlore/Rochester, etc., models. The advantage of these trees over the cheaper ones lies in the built-up instep on the front piece, allowing the tree to make fuller contact with the shoe, particularly the upper part of the vamp. For me this advantage is not worth the considerable price difference--$87 on eBay (in a very rare appearance) vs. the $14.50 you pay on eBay for the Woodlore/Rochester ones. In theory, this greater amount of support and contact from these Lobb trees constitutes an advantage, but I seriously doubt that if you compared two pairs of shoes one stored with the Lobb trees and the other with the cheaper cedar ones, there'd be 2 cents worth of difference in the shape, appearance, and condition (even in the vamp area) of the shoes after several years of storage.
     


  4. MilanoStyle

    MilanoStyle Senior member

    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    I agree with Roger, especially if the shoes fit well.
     


  5. The_Foxx

    The_Foxx Senior member

    Messages:
    3,903
    Likes Received:
    1,910
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2002
    Location:
    Northern VA, USA
    the only real difference, other than keeping the shape/ fit of the shoe a little better than the slimmer cedar trees is that Lobb shoes just require Lobb trees; you gotta have the inlaid brass plate with the Lobb logo, etc. in your shoes! If you got a really good deal on the Lobb shoes (i.e. around $550 for a $1,250 pair of shoes) you owe it you yourself and the shoes to buy the nice trees!

    [​IMG]
     


  6. Roger

    Roger Senior member

    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2005
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Lobb shoes just require Lobb trees; you gotta have the inlaid brass plate with the Lobb logo, etc. in your shoes! If you got a really good deal on the Lobb shoes (i.e. around $550 for a $1,250 pair of shoes) you owe it you yourself and the shoes to buy the nice trees![​IMG]
    Well there is something to that, I guess! I now feel a little guilty for subjecting my JLobb Westminsters to the indignity of Woodlore shoetrees.[​IMG]
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by