• Hi, I'm the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear and fashion.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Shoe refurbishing

johnnynorman3

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
2,700
Reaction score
18
I recall reading a post where you could get Ed Greens totally refurbished for $300; J & M will give a full factory refurbish for $185 or something like that for the Aristocrat line; Allen Edmonds I believe is in the $100s range as well. So, I was wondering: Is shoe refurbishment even worth it nowadays, what with Bluefly, outlet stores, Ebay, etc. in our midst? I mean, is it worth it to refurbish EGs for $300 when you could get a brand new pair for 4 - $500? I'm ignorant as to the answer to this question, which is why I ask it.
 

Joe G

Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2002
Messages
404
Reaction score
0
If you have your own shoes refurbished, you're not wearing someone else's used shoes....

Peace,

JG
 

brescd01

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2004
Messages
543
Reaction score
7
I had CJ's refurbished by AE for 60 dollars. I was quite satisfied: they used Redenbach soles at my request and though stitching was "aloft" I thought it was a nice refurbishment.
 

johnnynorman3

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
2,700
Reaction score
18
So, Rider, you hold the following assumption: "A new pair of EGs is not worth $200 more than a refurbished pair of EGs." Is this assumption a no-brainer for you? I know that a refurbished pair will have a patina, etc., but is there any value added to a new pair that a refurbished pair simply couldn't have in terms of the uppers?
 

RIDER

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2004
Messages
1,357
Reaction score
144
But why spend more when quite a few factories now refurbish shoes with the original materials? You have broken the shoe in, so to speak, and as you say, the uppers have taken on a nice patina if cared for properly. Even if you get a nice discount, why toss a perfectly good pair of shoes out that have much life left in them?
 

Alias

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Messages
1,536
Reaction score
3
I dunno, given the price discounts we seem to find it's sometimes hard to justify paying wads of dough to refurbish shoes instead of just getting new ones.

Still, if you're really into your shoes aging and developing a character of their own, I suppose refurbishing would be the way to go. Especially if the maker doesn't carry your model anymore.
 

jcusey

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Apr 24, 2003
Messages
1,803
Reaction score
53
I dunno, given the price discounts we seem to find it's sometimes hard to justify paying wads of dough to refurbish shoes instead of just getting new ones.
But if I have shoes that I've worn for a while and like, why would I want to get rid of them? Besides, good shoes get better with age, both in terms of appearance and fit. I like getting new shoes as much as the next guy, but I wouldn't trade some old favorites for them.
 

kabert

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Messages
2,093
Reaction score
5
Let's also not forget (.), that the "refurbishing" you're talking about is the creme de la creme. The middle (or lower) road is also an option -- that is, one's local corner cobbler; perhaps even the guy at the dry cleaners, who'll put on a new sole and/or heel for much less than the above prices quoted.
 

HRHAndrew

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2003
Messages
295
Reaction score
0
I think without question that I prefer to have my shoes refurbished rather than new. On better shoes, I find that the leather becomes more supple after wear, and they are molded to my feet. I think when dealing with Eg's for example, a factory refurbished shoe that was taken care of by its owner looks better than a new one.
 

clarinetplayer

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2002
Messages
4,613
Reaction score
7,677
For years, I have sent my AE shoes back to the factory for restoration. It is well worth the money. They do an excellent job.
 

marc237

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
2
I think the other advantage of refurbishing is that it allows you to retain a style that the company may no longer be producing.
 

Lomezz

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2003
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
I've been pondering this very question for a while now. I have an email from C&J informing me about their refurb service at 80 GBP plus shipping. They also have a cobbler in London who will do just the sole for 60 GBP.

Now, I'm wondering if spending almost $200 (80 GBP at about X1.80 against the US dollar plus shipping) is justified in the case of my handgrades which I paid $260 for and, after two years of service, will soon be ready for a sole replacement. I would hesitate to have it serviced by a local cobbler, though, as I can't be sure of their applying the proper methods and materials. For example, the original C&J rubber heel 'plug' is only halfway ground after two years of twice weekly wearings, and the oak bark sole has held extremely well compared with other shoes bought at the same time.

I have a rather good cobbler in my office building, but when I asked what type of sole are they using, the only thing the owner could tell me was that it's "premium". the term "oak bark" didn't ring a bell with him. I didn't even try "chanelled" and "stitched aloft" for fear I might get beaten up...

I'm seriously considering the Allen Edmonds option mentioned by the Doc. I know one thing - I will NOT throw those shoes away as I want to be able to show them to my son when he's ten (or eighteen) and say - "see those? I bought them the week you were born"
 

HRHAndrew

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2003
Messages
295
Reaction score
0
I really would spend the cash to have C&J redo them. Nothing like getting them back as new. Seems kinda like having Ford work on your Jaguar because they are really both Ford's.
 

faustian bargain

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
2,523
Reaction score
2
i'd much rather take my jag in to a local specialist. jaguar makes you pay through the nose for their service and parts. (unless you're under warranty.) besides, the newer jags apparently really are much more like the fords, under the hood. (i don't know this for certain, as mine is a '94 4L straight 6.) if you're going to compromise by buying a jaguar that's not really a jaguar, you may as well take it to ford for service. also the jags of recent years are just butt-ugly IMO. anyway, that's neither here nor there. it just muddies up the analogy. /andrew - not much help at all...
**edit: that 'andrew' is self-directed...it's just the way i sign postings. not addressed to YRH.. (please don't have me thrown in the dungeon&#33
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

Favorite knitwear under jackets/sport coats

  • Crewneck sweater

  • Turtleneck sweater

  • Long-sleeve polo

  • Vest

  • I don't like knitwear worn with jackets/sport coats


Results are only viewable after voting.

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
454,866
Messages
9,854,062
Members
205,512
Latest member
Trim Man
Top