1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Shoe opinions

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by ceestand, Apr 25, 2006.

  1. ceestand

    ceestand Member

    Messages:
    10
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    What do you think of these shoes?
    1)
    [​IMG]
    2)
    [​IMG]
    3)
    [​IMG]
     
  2. whoopee

    whoopee Senior member

    Messages:
    2,455
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    They don't do anything for me. The third is the worst.
     
  3. demeis

    demeis Senior member

    Messages:
    1,286
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2004
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    in order is how i like them.

    The first seems somewhat unbalanced
    The second not a fan of the broguing
    The Third just don't like the bicycle stitching, looks somewhat frankinstienish.
     
  4. Lucky Strike

    Lucky Strike Senior member

    Messages:
    3,459
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Location:
    Norway
    Number two works visually as a country shoe in the British tradition, I think.

    The other two are nice-enough, but I have to agree with Whoopee.

    What make are they?
     
  5. skalogre

    skalogre Senior member

    Messages:
    6,324
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Number 2 is ok I think but would like some pictures from a different angle.
     
  6. demeis

    demeis Senior member

    Messages:
    1,286
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2004
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    The problem with two is that the broging by the bottom of the laces is about 3 lines and a bit much IMO.
     
  7. skalogre

    skalogre Senior member

    Messages:
    6,324
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    The problem with two is that the broging by the bottom of the laces is about 3 lines and a bit much IMO.

    There is brogueing by the laces? Cannot even see it here.
     
  8. mensimageconsultant

    mensimageconsultant Senior member

    Messages:
    4,538
    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    In what situations would you be wearing them?

    How big are your feet, in size and compared to the rest of you?
     
  9. thinman

    thinman Senior member

    Messages:
    4,926
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Location:
    USA
    Although it may be the angle of the photos, the vamp looks too elongated on all of these shoes. On the second shoe, the broguing extends too far up the vamp for my tastes. The balance looks all wrong on these shoes.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by