longskate88
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2006
- Messages
- 1,218
- Reaction score
- 6
So I was messing with a Brannock device the other day...turns out my overall foot length suggests a size 10, but my arch length suggests more like an 11.5.
I know the device is not the greatest, but it made me notice the widest part of my foot actually extends into the toe box area of my current 9.5D AE Cliftons. It squeezes at this point.
So theoretically, do your toes matter? What would happen if you wore a shoe 3 sizes too long, provided the width and volume of the lacing area were correct? Seems like the lacing is what holds your heel in place, not your toes pressing against the front of the shoe.
My plan is to try something like a 10.5C to compare it to my current 9.5D...hoping to get less pressure on my toes, and maybe less heel slip due to the shoe's flex point now matching my foots (the flex point thing could also be total BS, but sounds like it makes sense)
I know the device is not the greatest, but it made me notice the widest part of my foot actually extends into the toe box area of my current 9.5D AE Cliftons. It squeezes at this point.
So theoretically, do your toes matter? What would happen if you wore a shoe 3 sizes too long, provided the width and volume of the lacing area were correct? Seems like the lacing is what holds your heel in place, not your toes pressing against the front of the shoe.
My plan is to try something like a 10.5C to compare it to my current 9.5D...hoping to get less pressure on my toes, and maybe less heel slip due to the shoe's flex point now matching my foots (the flex point thing could also be total BS, but sounds like it makes sense)