STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
the list doesnt include shoes that I returned. EG is unremarkable and overpriced at best. C&J looks like C&J, JL looks like JL, G&G looks like G&G, EG just looks like a $1000 C&J. Go over to the BB thread and youll see the amount of confusion that arose when several members mistook a $300 C&J for a EG. They look too much alike for the $500-$700 upcharge. Not worth it imo. Much rather prefer G&G and JL at that price point.
EDIT - I do like EG lasts as they fit my foot really well. Should I have the opportunity to purchase the Shannon Boot on the 82, Ill jump on it
The true test for any shoes is wearing them and how they holdup over time. You have a large collection and your shoes are less than 1 year old.
Nore, may I ask what brand/maker of shoe you propose is a better value at a similar price point to C&J benchgrade, and why?
Bear in mind that my shoes for work very rarely see a wet or even damp sidewalk, and even if I wear them for 15 years I am unlikely to suffer any unfortunate consequences from their exposed but channeled stitching and slightly lesser quality sole material.
I'm not attempting to argue with you or even to defend my choice here. I simply honestly wish to know your thoughts/concerns as well as suggestions. As I know you have more experience in this regard than I do.
Grenson Rose -
Alfred Sargent Premier -
Joseph Cheaney Premier -
All very good shoes for their respective price point which was below C&J Benchgrade. It's curious that only the Benchgrade continues to thrive today, whilst the rest are extinct.
See, this is subjective because a large part of a shoe's value is how they fit the individual. To illustrate I put confidence in EG because aside from the materials and finish quality, they fit me perfectly. And the trees fit the shoes perfectly. So much so that if I showed you a pair I had and wore that were purchased two years ago you'd think they were still new.
Shoes I'd put on par with or above C&J benchgrade so you can test that theory:
Grenson Rose -
Alfred Sargent Premier -
Joseph Cheaney Premier -
All of these sold for less than the price of C&Js benchgrade lines IIRC. There may be more but they either escape my memory or I don't have experience with them. BTW, I believe I have done a more comprehensive list under my former sn bigbris1 if you care to search.
Hope this helps.
Unfortunately the pesky job thing is going to keep me from creating shoe Appreciation this afternoon as planned. Here's the new group of C&J benchgrades. Lowly as they are in the shoe totem pole I still find them to be worthwhile new additions for daily wear.
Better Appreciation will be forthcoming at some point.
G.
I'm new in my shoe journey as well, and have to say, with NAMOR, that I too don't get EG shoes at their price point.
My experience of them has been largely limited to a visit I paid Leather Soul in Hawaii and saw a bunch of them which I handled (but did not try on). Neither the leather nor the design appealed to me; neither seemed to suggest that the price was worth it. I even saw the famed shell cordovan EG (Sandringham in Cognac); just did not see how they were better than the C&J Marlow.
Lobbs I get and own. EG - maybe the details are too subtle for me at this point in my evolution, and I know I don't know a lot.. Although I doubt I will ever get a feel of them, unless again like NAMOR I get my hands on a Shannon.
Unfortunately the pesky job thing is going to keep me from creating shoe Appreciation this afternoon as planned. Here's the new group of C&J benchgrades. Lowly as they are in the shoe totem pole I still find them to be worthwhile new additions for daily wear.
Better Appreciation will be forthcoming at some point.
G.