STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by GusW, Jul 27, 2008.
which style did you order
remember shell is addictive
i hope not india
Look great sstomcat, I would like to see different angle pictures like you did with your shell alt wien. How do you compare the fit with your 3636 and F?, are you wearing the same size?
They are well built ..but believe me they look a lot sleeker on my feet...
no doubt. honest pics are damn near impossible so get.
enjoy the shoes!
Will do it for you...give me a day or so...
Regarding fit these are narrower that the 3636 for sure, specially the toe and slightly less along the ball of the foot. I do not see any difference in the instep and heel fit. I'd say this is more snug fit than the 3636 in general.
I have a F in oxford so a slightly different comparison and probably will not be able to give a accurate description but will give a shot.. . The vamp on my F seems a tad tight but the budapester doesn't feel so. The instep is higher in the F for sure and both feel compact and have similar snug heel fit, which I prefer and imo very important.
Thanks very much, very helpful, so you wear the same size in all 3 lasts.
they are well balanced, imo.
socks are clashing with the patina, imo.
lol, yarly. but apparently, notrly.
uncle will be proud. looks good.
Separate names with a comma.