RLPL Barksdale vs. Mackay. Which is more versatile?

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by NMW1982, Apr 7, 2006.

  1. NMW1982

    NMW1982 Senior member

    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Which is more versatile and why? Can you pull off wearing either one with jeans?
     


  2. A Y

    A Y Senior member

    Messages:
    5,595
    Likes Received:
    380
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Location:
    Southern California
    I wear the Mackays with jeans, usually with a dress shirt and blazer. I think it works best with a fitted jean, as opposed to an anti-fit.

    --Andre
     


  3. whoopee

    whoopee Senior member

    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    I wrote this in the other thread: the Mackay. In fact, I'm wearing them now with a shirt tucked into dark, slimmish jeans. Of course more casual denim will not work, nor will tees on top.
     


  4. The_Foxx

    The_Foxx Senior member

    Messages:
    3,903
    Likes Received:
    1,910
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2002
    Location:
    Northern VA, USA
    which one is the barksdale? i've only seen the one RLPL shoe on the polo website. also, do you guys know if there is a black RLPL chelsea boot (and about how much does it go for??)

    thanks!
     


  5. NMW1982

    NMW1982 Senior member

    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005


  6. drake

    drake Senior member

    Messages:
    601
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Location:
    Westwood, Los Angeles
    The Barksdale looks very much like an old mans shoe to me. Get the Mackay.
     


  7. j

    j (stands for Jerk) Admin

    Messages:
    14,914
    Likes Received:
    93
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2002
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    The MacKay is more versatile. I can see wearing that with anywhere from jeans to trim khakis or cords to the best navy worsted suit. Penny loafers do not go that high in the range of formality. You are pretty much limited to sportcoats and below with loafers like that.

    Plus I think the heel counters on the loafers look just a bit weird, but that's just me. I probably wouldn't wear penny loafers anyway.
     


  8. skalogre

    skalogre Senior member

    Messages:
    6,324
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Mackay for me hands down, no question - not even a moment's hesitation.
     


  9. NMW1982

    NMW1982 Senior member

    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    I've asked some of my friends as well and they seem to be split. What I've noticed however is that which of those two shoes a person perfers is correlated with their age. Now could each of you post your age?
     


  10. whoopee

    whoopee Senior member

    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    How exactly does the split correlate? I am 20.
     


  11. Roger

    Roger Senior member

    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2005
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Well, I guess it remains for me to be the contrarian on this question. In my mind, most cap-toes, and particularly balmorals, just look out of place with anything remotely casual. The Mackay will look good with a suit, but a little less so with a sports jacket/odd trousers. Perfed bluchers would be fine in the latter case, but to my eye, sleek balmorals like these look badly incongruous with jeans, chinos, or, really, anything but a jacket and tie at least. The Barksdale, on the other hand, looks completely natural with jeans, chinos, and anything casual, but can, in addition, be appropriately worn with jacket/tie/odd trousers, and would look ideal with a jacket and turtleneck or jacket/open-collared shirt. Further, sleek, stylish, and high-end loafers like these can, if necessary, work with a suit too, not looking badly out of place.
     


  12. NMW1982

    NMW1982 Senior member

    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    From what I have noticed, younger guys seem to like the Barksdale more as it is a sleeker, more modern design. They seem to think that the Barksdale is a lot more versatile in that it can be worn with anything from high end jeans to a suit.
    Older men on the other hand tend to gravitate towards the Mackay with it's traditional broguing and cap-toe style. The Mackays seem like the type of shoe that should only be worn with a suit, lest you look like one of those old overweight bankers trying too hard to look stylish.
    The Barksdale, in my opinion, has more of a European/Italian sensibility, whereas the Mackays are more old school English.

    Does anyone care to differ?
     


  13. The False Prophet

    The False Prophet Senior member

    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    66
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    In my mind, most cap-toes, and particularly balmorals, just look out of place with anything remotely casual.

    I am in total agreement with this. Also, the shape seems wrong for jeans. Generally, I will wear trim and fairly tapered shoes with narrow leg jeans, and rounder toed loafers with bootcuts (so the bottom covers the vamp and leaves only a little showing).

    The Barksdale is too squared-off and, yes, too "old-mannish" for jeans IMHO. It's like something by Allen-Edmonds. Better leather, better construction, but still that style.

    For my part, Gucci (and Ferragamo) loafers, plain-toe bluechers, and chelsea, chukka and jodphur boots are the ideal shoes with jeans. Wholecuts look really nifty, as do trim dark brogues.

    As with trousers, I think open-lacing should be worn with shorter legs, minimal break and maybe narrower openings, and closed-lacing with slightly longer and fuller jeans. If you wear longer ones with bluechers, you run the risk of the opening bunching on the vamp.

    Just my two cents...
     


  14. whoopee

    whoopee Senior member

    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    The Mackay certainly is the more formal design, though it is almost the sleekest semi-brogue available. Young men wearing loafers with suits usually either look ignorant or trying to hard to be cool. In fact, it is that very few young men own a truly elegant, classic shoe like the Mackay that makes them so cool when pulled off well. No doubt this depends on one's inherent sense of style.

    Also note that penny loafers carry connotations, too, and not of youth. Though - and perhaps because - it is often done, wearing them with suits is not a good idea.
     


  15. NMW1982

    NMW1982 Senior member

    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Let's try to get back on topic--which shoe is better for which occasion and which one is better for a guy in his 20s? Mackay or Barksdale?
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by