Retail's prejudice against the slim

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by imageWIS, Apr 18, 2005.

  1. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    As long as we are talking about retail's prejudice against the obese, how about their prejudice against the slim? It is impossible to find a size 36S jacket, or even a size small shirt / polo / sweater, let alone an XS. 14.5 shirts as well are impossible to find RTW.

    Jon.
     


  2. ATM

    ATM Senior member

    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2005
    Location:
    Detroit suburbs
    And what about 32" as the shortest sleeve length?.
     


  3. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    (imageWIS @ April 18 2005,16:01) As long as we are talking about retail's prejudice against the obese, how about their prejudice against the slim? It is impossible to find a size 36S jacket, or even a size small shirt / polo / sweater, let alone an XS. 14.5 shirts as well are impossible to find RTW. Jon.
    And what about 32" as the shortest sleeve length?.
    Well, its not a good thing, but at least sleeves can be shortened. Jon.
     


  4. Tyto

    Tyto Senior member

    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Location:
    SoCal
    I toyed with starting this thread--glad you stepped up.

    [rant]

    36S is not only difficult to find, but it's rarely even *made* by many firms. I think BB has one Brooksease suit in 36S, JPress is a little bit better (their tropicals are available in 36S, but I couldn't find anything else last fall), but Southwick RTW doesn't go below 38, and many places that stock Southwick at great prices don't carry anything under 40 anyway.

    And we can just forget about so many of the really great deals at places like McGee, Orvis, Polo, because even if they make a 36S or a small or XS (rare), they're long gone by the time the sales hit. Okay, Polo sometimes has some 36S, but unless you want black or black pinstripe, forget it.

    Also, the Small/XS/36S/14.5 clothing, when you can find it, seems like little more than a shortened and re-collared 15.5. I'm not exactly emaciated, but I can't count the number of 14.5 shirts that still billowed on me.

    [/rant]

    We had a short/slim thread going right around December or January (basically a compilation of places we could get 36S/14.5 or below), but I've been unable to find it in the archives. Does anyone have a link to it?

    Also, re: the boys' dept. We could shop there (and I have, on occasion), but what about when you want the quality stuff? not too many makers have canvassed or 1/2-cavassed suits for boys, let alone the nicer fabrics.

    I remember a BB salesman telling me how lucky he thought I was that I could fit into a boys' Brooksease, thereby saving myself upwards of $200 (and, really, he was right in a sense). But what I really wanted was the beautiful gray flannel across the aisle in the mens' department, a suit that came in 38R at the smallest.
     


  5. stache

    stache Senior member

    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2004
    Guys you should be shopping in the boys' dept.
     


  6. Ed13

    Ed13 Senior member

    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    It is as it is. Whether extremely fat or small and thin, you are going to have problems with buying clothes. I wear a 16.5 shirt with a 36" arm and I find almost all makes extremely baggy. Everything in North America seems to be cut for guys with fat beer bellies. I have the shirts darted and move on. Be thankful you aren't a "normal size" (5'9" and look 6+ months pregnant). It would suck to be normal.
     


  7. Brian SD

    Brian SD Moderator

    Messages:
    9,760
    Likes Received:
    122
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Location:
    Tokyo
    This is why American RTW is vastly inferior to European RTW, in which smaller sizes are almost always stocked in boutiques (in great numbers, as well).
     


  8. gj555

    gj555 Senior member

    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    15
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Location:
    Toronto
    We should also call this manufacturers prejudice against the slim. So many manufacturers create clothing that is cut really wide.

    For example, a 15 shirt fits perfectly in the neck but is so big in the arms and torso. (14.5 will not do up on me). Who in the world has a 15 neck with massive biceps and pecs?

    I notice the same problem for pants. 31 or 32 may fit (or nearly fit in the waist) but is too big in the legs and just below the but (letting out a 30 1.5 inches fits better than taking in a 32 .5 inches).
     


  9. FIHTies

    FIHTies Senior member

    Messages:
    2,959
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Location:
    Back and Better Than Before
    Nonsense... Most of wht I carry in the RTW caters to these sizes. And while I dont have yet many styles in 34S and 36S next season will be different. These are the suits that A Harris rated in this thread. http://66.170.193.77/cgi-bin....;t=4845 Shirts, sweaters etc. are already available in the small sizes. Stop complaining. Â Start Shopping... [​IMG] EDIT: Â Clod...Wrong thread... Also The suit that DietCookie is wearing in the Reveal yourself thread page 37 is from me... http://66.170.193.77/cgi-bin....;st=360
     


  10. StevenRocks

    StevenRocks Senior member

    Messages:
    617
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    Location:
    Southwest Virginia
    Okay guys, I understand that there is a paucity of stylish clothes made for smaller people, but it's not quite the same as the situation for the obese.  For one thing, if something is too big, it's easier to alter it to fit because you have material to work with.  When something is too small, that luxury does not exist.  

    As BrianSD mentioned, you can always move into the European or selected American designer lines that are cut for your bodies.  If you're on the other end of the scale, those options become Casual Male and the King Size catalog, both of which are atrocious.

    The point of the other thread was that salespeople mistreat fat people.  If you can prove to me that someone has seen a small person and treated them badly just because of that in a regular retail environment, then please accept my apology.  But I don't think it happens much, if at all, and the very existence of this thread smacks of a mocking tone towards the struggles of our fatter bretheren.
     


  11. SmartDresser

    SmartDresser Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Location:
    San Francisco
    And what about 32" as the shortest sleeve length?.[/quote]
    Humm, most retailers stock that sleeve length. Also, the 14.5 in dress shirts. But not enough are sold to enable them to inverntory more that a few.
     


  12. SmartDresser

    SmartDresser Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Exactly. If the store you shop at does not carry your size, go to a different store. Nordstrom carries a vast size inventory. Check it out.
     


  13. zjpj83

    zjpj83 Senior member

    Messages:
    9,464
    Likes Received:
    12
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    36 Shorts are the coolest people around.. [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     


  14. FIHTies

    FIHTies Senior member

    Messages:
    2,959
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Location:
    Back and Better Than Before
    Which kind of puts the topic of this thread and Steven's correct comments into perspective. This issue isnt about slim its actually about short.
     


  15. zjpj83

    zjpj83 Senior member

    Messages:
    9,464
    Likes Received:
    12
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    (zjpj83 @ April 18 2005,19:55) 36 Shorts are the coolest people around.. [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
    Which kind of puts the topic of this thread and Steven's correct comments into perspective. This issue isnt about slim its actually about short.
    I don't see chaps who are 5'10" with a 42 inch chest and a 32 inch waist too thrilled with their RTW options either.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by