• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Renters Insurance Question

vanity

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
734
Reaction score
2
My gf and I are renting and have renter's insurance on the estimated value of our belongings...roughly $30k for the policy. This way in case the place burns down or we get robbed, we're insured. Good deal for disasters.

Yesterday I received a letter from my apartment mgmt group that across town, a different apt complex experienced a fire. Many of the surrounding apartments received smoke and water damage as a result. These units will need to be re-painted, re-carpted, new fixtures, etc. They went in to explain that replacing those items of smoke and water damage (from the fire) is the tenant's responsibility. And they advised us that to replace our apartment interior, if a similar situation occurred, would be roughly $100k. They curteously enclosed packets from an insurance provider, urging us to sign up.

We're both calling bullshit on this one and our insurance provider has asked to see this apartment complex document. I don't see how our interior could cost anywhere NEAR $100k, why we would be responsible for fire damage to their property, and the inclusion of a certain (sole) company's information/sign-up form is very questionable.
 

EL72

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
6,760
Reaction score
8
Your $30k coverage is for insuring your contents, which is what I had as well as a renter, and should be fine unless you have aportnoy's shoe collection. The rest of the apartment (walls, fixtures...) do not belong to you so they are not your responsibility to insure. It may well cost $100K or more to replace/fix those but they are the landlord's responsibility, not yours.
 

vanity

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
734
Reaction score
2
I think one of our minimum wage "tour guides" must've started dating some douchebag at an insurance company. Together they concocted this marsupialed scheme to scare tenants into opening unnecessary policies.
 

SUPER K

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
489
Reaction score
9
unless the other complex was composed of condos...
 

vanity

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
734
Reaction score
2
I wonder what would happen if that other apartment building had condos. Instead of apartments like I originally stated. What then?
 

rdawson808

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
4,122
Reaction score
4
If the other one were condos the master insurance policy would have covered the structure (which you pay for through your condo fees). The individual unit owners still only have to cover their own stuff.

bob
 

minhi

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by vanity
I wonder what would happen if that other apartment building had condos. Instead of apartments like I originally stated. What then?

as rdawson says the condo's policy would cover the basics for the building. however the condo owner has to pay the deductible (usually quite high, mine is $5K). and there's also the issue of how complete the restoration for each individual unit will be, some condo interiors are nicer then others and typically the insurance only covers a basic amount.
 

Memphis

Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2006
Messages
103
Reaction score
2
From what I understood when I talked to my insurance agent, renters insurance only covers the contents of your appartment, the structure is the responsibility of the landlord or management company.
 

fastrunningmom

Active Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Vanity,
When we were first married (a long long time ago), we owned two condos - one we lived in and one we rented out. We researched this whole topic pretty thoroughly.

It may have changed, and/or differ from state to state, but here's what we found . . . our renters were only responsible for what THEY owned (e.g. furniture, clothing, atc.). As condo owners, we were responsible for everything from the studs in (whether we lived in it or not); so, sheetrock, paint, carpet, fixtures, appliances, etc., were our responsibility and therefore, ours to insure. From the studs out, belonged to the condo association and was their responsibility to insure (e.g., siding, roofing, etc.) There was a battle royal at one point when a neighbor's window was smashed by a branch during a storm. I don't remember how it was resolved.

Based on this, you are absolutely right that you only need to insure your 30K of possessions and nothing else.

Any attorneys want to weigh in on this?
 

vanity

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
734
Reaction score
2
It has come to my attention that one of the tenants in our apartment complex is an agent for this insurance company. This week I'll fax a letter to our apartment management that I wish to not subscribe to any Tom Dick and Harry tennant peddling his wares under the guise of "Security", and I request that the apartment complex strongly rethink how they endorse those that solicit to paying tenants on their property.

Further investigation shows that tenants are not liable for any apartment structures, regardless of how much it costs to repaint, refinish, or recarpet. Renters insurance simply covers the value of the items owned by the tenant. Thus the clause included in our documention; "The cost of repairing your unit (carpet, cabinets, etc) is valued at over $100k. Do YOU have renter's insurance)" is wholly irrelevant and misleading. This is a shady maneuver at
best.

Although I'm not totally familiar with insurance sales law, telling people they should consider "Renters Insurance" b/c of the high cost of repairs for an apartment structure, could be in violation of the law.

Those items have nothing to do with one another, and Renters Insurance doesn't cover apartment structural damage. It would be like encouraging someone to purchase car insurance b/c their house doesn't have a carbon monoxide detector...and that they could be liable if a visitor dies from the carbon monoxide in their home. They're selling a policy with fear, and they're lying about what the policy is used for.
 

EL72

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
6,760
Reaction score
8
Originally Posted by vanity
It has come to my attention that one of the tenants in our apartment complex is an agent for this insurance company. This week I'll fax a letter to our apartment management that I wish to not subscribe to any Tom Dick and Harry tennant peddling his wares under the guise of "Security", and I request that the apartment complex strongly rethink how they endorse those that solicit to paying tenants on their property.

Further investigation shows that tenants are not liable for any apartment structures, regardless of how much it costs to repaint, refinish, or recarpet. Renters insurance simply covers the value of the items owned by the tenant. Thus the clause included in our documention; "The cost of repairing your unit (carpet, cabinets, etc) is valued at over $100k. Do YOU have renter's insurance)" is wholly irrelevant and misleading. This is a shady maneuver at
best.

Although I'm not totally familiar with insurance sales law, telling people they should consider "Renters Insurance" b/c of the high cost of repairs for an apartment structure, could be in violation of the law.

Those items have nothing to do with one another, and Renters Insurance doesn't cover apartment structural damage. It would be like encouraging someone to purchase car insurance b/c their house doesn't have a carbon monoxide detector...and that they could be liable if a visitor dies from the carbon monoxide in their home. They're selling a policy with fear, and they're lying about what the policy is used for.


Welcome to the real world!
 

vanity

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
734
Reaction score
2
I sent the apartment management company this email:

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am a resident of X-ApartmentComplex at address YYYYY, #123. About a week ago we received a package at our doorstep regarding Renter's Insurance. The materials enclosed cited a case of a recent apartment complex fire in Naperville and the importance of renter's insurance to protect possessions. There was a specific paragraph that is in question, among a few other items;

1) This paragraph stated that the value of the apartment furnishings would cost over $100k. This includes repainting, re-carpeting, new cabinets, etc.
The problem here is that the tenant is not liable for any apartment structural damage. In fact, even with a policy of $100k+, renter's insurance would not pay for anything outside of the tenant's own, private possessions. This paragraph is inaccurate, and most likely used as a scare tactic ruse.

2) Enclosed were materials from a specific insurance company, of which an agent is a tenant at this apartment complex. What is the relationship between this agent and X-ApartmentComplex outside of tenant/landlord? Clearly X-ApartmentComplex management endorses his/her insurance policies, even if the writing of such is wholly inaccurate. Is it part of X-ApartmentComplex policy to endorse all advertisements by tenants of their apartment complex?

3) There was a prize involved for tenants who could prove they have renter's insurance. What this creates is an incentive for renters to purchase insurance from this particular agent under false pretenses.

I'm not completely familiar with insurance law, but selling insurance under the guise of covering something it will not, and then offering a prize for purchasing that insurance, could possibly be in violation of the law. I understand that X-ApartmentComplex would most likely want it's tenants insured, but endorsing a single insurance provider under these inaccurate pretenses is extremely questionable.

I request that this situation be investigated and the residents notified of any forthcomings.


Thank-you for your time,
 

auto90403

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
448
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by EL72
Your $30k coverage is for insuring your contents, which is what I had as well as a renter, and should be fine unless you have aportnoy's shoe collection. The rest of the apartment (walls, fixtures...) do not belong to you so they are not your responsibility to insure. It may well cost $100K or more to replace/fix those but they are the landlord's responsibility, not yours.


Bingo.

Tenant might have liability if he were at fault for a fire, but I've never heard of owner's insurance company going after a tenant.
 

fastrunningmom

Active Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by vanity
I sent the apartment management company this email:

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am a resident of X-ApartmentComplex at address YYYYY, #123. About a week ago we received a package at our doorstep regarding Renter's Insurance. The materials enclosed cited a case of a recent apartment complex fire in Naperville and the importance of renter's insurance to protect possessions. There was a specific paragraph that is in question, among a few other items; . . . clipped . . .



Exactly! Good job!
 

lawyerdad

Lying Dog-faced Pony Soldier
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
27,006
Reaction score
17,139
Originally Posted by vanity
I sent the apartment management company this email:

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am a resident of X-ApartmentComplex at address YYYYY, #123. About a week ago we received a package at our doorstep regarding Renter's Insurance. The materials enclosed cited a case of a recent apartment complex fire in Naperville and the importance of renter's insurance to protect possessions. There was a specific paragraph that is in question, among a few other items;

1) This paragraph stated that the value of the apartment furnishings would cost over $100k. This includes repainting, re-carpeting, new cabinets, etc.
The problem here is that the tenant is not liable for any apartment structural damage. In fact, even with a policy of $100k+, renter's insurance would not pay for anything outside of the tenant's own, private possessions. This paragraph is inaccurate, and most likely used as a scare tactic ruse.

2) Enclosed were materials from a specific insurance company, of which an agent is a tenant at this apartment complex. What is the relationship between this agent and X-ApartmentComplex outside of tenant/landlord? Clearly X-ApartmentComplex management endorses his/her insurance policies, even if the writing of such is wholly inaccurate. Is it part of X-ApartmentComplex policy to endorse all advertisements by tenants of their apartment complex?

3) There was a prize involved for tenants who could prove they have renter's insurance. What this creates is an incentive for renters to purchase insurance from this particular agent under false pretenses.

I'm not completely familiar with insurance law, but selling insurance under the guise of covering something it will not, and then offering a prize for purchasing that insurance, could possibly be in violation of the law. I understand that X-ApartmentComplex would most likely want it's tenants insured, but endorsing a single insurance provider under these inaccurate pretenses is extremely questionable.

I request that this situation be investigated and the residents notified of any forthcomings.


Thank-you for your time,

fing02[1].gif
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 55 36.7%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 59 39.3%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 15 10.0%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 26 17.3%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 26 17.3%

Forum statistics

Threads
505,131
Messages
10,578,706
Members
223,885
Latest member
Garyypangburn
Top