1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Ray-Ban: Trite or Classic?

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by JJGooden, Feb 16, 2012.

  1. SirGrotius

    SirGrotius Senior member

    Messages:
    2,866
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Trite now. Mass produced, mass worn, and are no longer cool. So many other better brands.
     
  2. GTR

    GTR Senior member

    Messages:
    178
    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Everything brand that Luxottica acquires turns to shit; quality goes down while prices increase. They own most of the brands in the eyewear market.
     
  3. Allen Smithee

    Allen Smithee Active Member

    Messages:
    36
    Joined:
    May 9, 2014
    QFT

    +1

    Shell of what they were. The actual styles remain okay, but it's a shell of something once great.
     
  4. Marlena13

    Marlena13 New Member

    Messages:
    1
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2015
    Buy only the originals!
     
  5. sjoydavi

    sjoydavi New Member

    Messages:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2016
    I have these pair of raybans and i need to know how much they're worth please help anyone[​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  6. Sam H

    Sam H Senior member

    Messages:
    117
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    I don't think people are being too fair about quality. I used to buy only dollar stone sunglasses because I saw them as disposable. I saw them as disposable because they always broke. If I branched out into "luxury" mall brand territory, they would also just break but I was out $80 instead of $5. I'm talking lifespans of one month. I don't treat my stuff like crap. I really try and take care of my things. But whether I was buying overpriced Armani Exchange (yeah, I know... I go there for basics because I like their t-shirt fit) or picking them up at some street vendor from whatever no-name asian company that supplies those people, sunglasses would just wear out from normal use.

    I finally decided to dive in and get real grownup sunglasses. I researched it a bit but went with Rayban because the styles I always wore were Aviator and Wayfarer knockoffs, and I figured I might as well just go to the source and buy the originals. I purchased both in the span of maybe 6 months back in 2014. They are both still going strong. I baby them less than I ever did my cheap sunglasses. They show no real signs of wear or damage barring the need to get them straightened sometimes and also the lens of the aviator occasionally needing to be popped back in. They are both made in Italy and brand new as of 2014. They are the styles I like and they are the classic proprietors of those styles. The quality as far as I am concerned is excellent, coming from the world of crappy (yet not necessarily cheap) sunglasses. Would I maybe branch out a bit more when shopping for eyeglasses if I didn't wear contacts? Yeah, perhaps. But when it comes to sunglasses, I have exactly what I want with my Aviators and Wayfarers and I finally understand why they are $150 a piece even though when I was younger I used to scoff at prices like that for eyewear. I could have just bought them originally and probably saved a ton of money over the years that went into crappy disposable knockoffs.
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2016

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by