Ray-Ban: Trite or Classic?

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by JJGooden, Feb 16, 2012.

  1. JJGooden

    JJGooden Senior member

    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Location:
    San Francisco, California
    We're not too far away from sunglasses season (at least here in California). I was wondering if there's any SF consensus on Ray-Ban. Are they considered too mainstream and undifferentiated or classic and always in style? I have heard of some anti-Ray Ban guys preferring Randolph Engineering aviators, among others.
     
  2. David Reeves

    David Reeves Affiliate Vendor Affiliate Vendor

    Messages:
    3,112
    Likes Received:
    2,061
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Location:
    New York
    I like em.
     
  3. Archivist

    Archivist Senior member

    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    25
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Ray-ban is a company. Some of their sunglasses are classic. Others leave something to be desired.
     
  4. JJGooden

    JJGooden Senior member

    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Location:
    San Francisco, California
    

    Well, if you want to be a technical snark, Ray-Ban is not a company, it's a brand owned by Luxottica. And yes, obviously there's variety in their sunglasses. I was looking for a general conclusion about the brand, taking their whole line into consideration.
     
  5. motosacto

    motosacto Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    71
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2012
    Location:
    Sacramento
    Ray-Ban was owned by Bausch and Lomb and sold to Luxottica in 1999. They originated (or popularized) many iconic eyeglass frames, including Aviators, Wayfarers (probably what the original poster meant by "Ray-Bans"), Clubmasters ("Malcolm X glasses"), and Baloramas (wrap-arounds worn by Clint Eastwood in the original Dirty Harry).

    The modern Luxottica versions of several frames (e.g., Wayfarers) now have a gaudy script "Ray Ban" logo on the temple. Other than that, I would call them classics.

    Paddle-temple square aviators are military-specification glasses designed to fit under flight helmets. Randolph Engineering, American Optical, and other companies make them.
     
  6. JJGooden

    JJGooden Senior member

    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Location:
    San Francisco, California
    
    Interesting point about the script on the temple. Perhaps this is the source of the small "ray-ban rebellion". Thanks for the context, moto.
     
  7. ijesse

    ijesse Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Location:
    Guangzhou CHINA
    I admire Ray Bans because the brand popularised classic styles - there is merit however in quality manufacture - which Luxottica generally falls short of, and by the sounds of it - Randolph Engineering and American Optical meet.
     
  8. Digmenow

    Digmenow Senior member

    Messages:
    3,180
    Likes Received:
    760
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Location:
    The Land of Pleasant Living
    I am seriously considering copping these Bausch and Lomb 62014 Aviators from a local pawn shop. They are in excellent condition w/case needing only some minor cleaning and adjustment. The current 'deal' price is $70. I just can't pull the trigger.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2012
  9. gegarrenton

    gegarrenton Senior member

    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    24
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2011
    Location:
    Virgina Beach, Va.
    Ray Ban's are a classic brand. I would vouch for the quality of the Luxottica manufactured ones as well, at least the Wayfarers and Aviators, mine have been fine. There's no reason to put one brand in front of the other though, good glasses could be had across the spectrum of styles. Anyone who is bagging on RayBans because they are "mainstream" is just the typical "Look how awesome I am because I am different" type, which honestly is more common than just buying what you like in the first place.

    FWIW, my other glasses are Oakley Juliets which are absolutely awesome performance wise. I went through a phase of thinking Oakleys were lame for being mainstream in the late 90's until I realized how ridiculous that notion is.

    Cheers
     
  10. Patek

    Patek Senior member

    Messages:
    2,969
    Likes Received:
    195
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Location:
    Delawhere?
    I don't wear them due to the visable logo as I tent to not wear anything with visable logo (although I do own a pair of Maui Jims that I use as backup).
     
  11. SirGrotius

    SirGrotius Senior member

    Messages:
    2,876
    Likes Received:
    444
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    They're a bit overplayed. Or way overplayed, but they look GREAT.

    If you want another brand to be different go Tom Ford or Oliver Peoples, everything else is trying too hard.
     
  12. Bonggoy

    Bonggoy Senior member

    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    19
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    This question is akin to asking a consensus on Coca Cola. Some will like them, some won't. The only opinion that matters is your own.

    To answer your question, Yes they are classics. They popularized the two most iconic sunglasses; Aviator and Wayfarer. My older siblings always had Raybans. I have a Persol and RE.
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2012
  13. VelvetGreen

    VelvetGreen Senior member

    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    37
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    

    Persol is try-hard?
     
  14. gegarrenton

    gegarrenton Senior member

    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    24
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2011
    Location:
    Virgina Beach, Va.
    Exactly
     
  15. jawboneofa

    jawboneofa Senior member

    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    23
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2011
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    

    IMO something seems just a little "off"...maybe the temples are a little low on the side of the lens frame?
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by