costanaconda
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 164
- Reaction score
- 81
Yea, I'm seeing that now. Any ideas what they are? Maybe loake?
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Can anyone tell me the name of this model?
Can anyone tell me the name of this model?
Looks like the C&J for Ralph Lauren Darlton/Marlow PTB (on 325 last) in dark cognac shell.
I think the consensus is that these are not on 325 last but rather on 341 last.
I think the consensus is that these are not on 325 last but rather on 341 last.
^^Crap! didn't know that - I would have purchased those. 341 is a great last.
I need some help with the 358 and 348 lasts. I understand the 348 is the bench grade version of the 358, but are they exactly the same? I have heard that the 348 is very long. Does anyone have experience with both?
The 358 is actually just a smidge longer than the 348. I haven't worn both lasts but I held them up together in the store. I was told by the SA that the fit between the two is essentially identical with the exception of the minor difference in length. So presuming he was speaking the truth........
The 348 is indeed a long last in general - I am holding up a pair next to my G&Gs in the TG73 and even though the C&Js are 1/2 size smaller the overall shoe is still about 1/8" longer on the C&J than on the G&G. I have a 341 lasted shoe at home - not with me here at the office - but as I recall it is about 1/4" shorter than the 348. And of course it is much more oval, less chiseled.
For me the 348 last is total win. Fits my feet perfectly - including my rather highish arch.
The 358 is actually just a smidge longer than the 348. I haven't worn both lasts but I held them up together in the store. I was told by the SA that the fit between the two is essentially identical with the exception of the minor difference in length. So presuming he was speaking the truth........
The 348 is indeed a long last in general - I am holding up a pair next to my G&Gs in the TG73 and even though the C&Js are 1/2 size smaller the overall shoe is still about 1/8" longer on the C&J than on the G&G. I have a 341 lasted shoe at home - not with me here at the office - but as I recall it is about 1/4" shorter than the 348. And of course it is much more oval, less chiseled.
For me the 348 last is total win. Fits my feet perfectly - including my rather highish arch.
According to the CJ store manager at The Royal Exchange, more than 50% of the shoes sold last year were 348/358.
Re sizing, I am an 8.5, but in the two derby styles I have in 358 (Brunswick and Prestwood) I easily went down half a size to an 8 at the recommendation of the staff.
Well isn't that because 50% of their shoes are on those lasts?
According to the CJ store manager at The Royal Exchange, more than 50% of the shoes sold last year were 348/358.
Re sizing, I am an 8.5, but in the two derby styles I have in 358 (Brunswick and Prestwood) I easily went down half a size to an 8 at the recommendation of the staff.