** Quintessential Crockett & Jones Thread ** (reviews, quality, etc...)

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by david3558, Feb 24, 2011.

  1. venividivicibj

    venividivicibj Senior member

    Messages:
    11,223
    Likes Received:
    3,889
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    sorry, I meant I'd like to see the 325 last in this for comparison. just so its all lined up and can reference everything (because I'm told its not very sleek, but it looks very nice from your pictures)
     


  2. jrd617

    jrd617 Senior member

    Messages:
    14,725
    Likes Received:
    2,328
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009


  3. venividivicibj

    venividivicibj Senior member

    Messages:
    11,223
    Likes Received:
    3,889
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    [​IMG]
    looks almost the same as the 341
     


  4. jrd617

    jrd617 Senior member

    Messages:
    14,725
    Likes Received:
    2,328
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    341 has a more pronounced, sharper toe. I've decided against getting the PTB for myself because it's too pointy for casual wear

    You can see this on the Marlow wingtip (325) vs PTB (341).

    325 wingtip

    [​IMG]


    341 ptb
    [​IMG]
     


  5. alexSF

    alexSF Senior member

    Messages:
    1,490
    Likes Received:
    300
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Location:
    Italy
    ^ PTB isn't made on the 341 last (as the tassel isn't made on the 325 or 72 as some stated only because Cavendish is in the 325...)

    They are probably two archive lasts chosen by RL and not used in the current catalogue.
     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2013


  6. Fiddler

    Fiddler Senior member

    Messages:
    757
    Likes Received:
    91
    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    I love simple strong designs like this and the grained leather...what is this model called?
     


  7. clee1982

    clee1982 Senior member

    Messages:
    8,393
    Likes Received:
    471
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Location:
    New York City, NY, USA
    alexSF, so no wonder so much sizing question about PTB...
     




  8. chipshot

    chipshot Senior member

    Messages:
    2,022
    Likes Received:
    1,302
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2012
    Location:
    Sonoran Desert
    

    Owning both RL PTB and Ashworth, the RL Marlow PTB is indeed not 341. It is not as pointy as the Ashdown. The beauty of C&J Burgandy Shell is amazing. Lovin the Ashdown shape, not a Bulbous Alden look.
     


  9. jrd617

    jrd617 Senior member

    Messages:
    14,725
    Likes Received:
    2,328
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    What's the PTB on then?


    I've heard the theory that the RL shoes are on substantially different lasts, but I don't buy it, at least for the wingtip and loafer

    The penny is basically the Boston with a fullstrap
    Wingtip is the Pembroke with some broguing differences
     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2013


  10. sevenfoldtieguy

    sevenfoldtieguy Senior member

    Messages:
    4,292
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Location:
    ND
    

    The C&J for RL Marlow PTB and Marlow SWB and Lindrick boot are on the 325 last. I own them all.
     


  11. Tuur

    Tuur Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    5
    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2013
    Interesting. I'm gonna buy either the Lonsdale in the 363-last or the Audley in the 337-last. I have shoes on the 348-last and I'll make the choice Audley/Lonsdale on which one fits the closest to the 348-last.

    On the basis of this chart I would say the 363-last is closer to the 348-last then to the 337. Or not?
     


  12. Celadon

    Celadon Senior member

    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    48
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2012
    Location:
    Somewhere else
    This chart makes it look as if all these shoes are roughly the same length in any given size. Is that really correct?
     


  13. FredAstaire1899

    FredAstaire1899 Senior member

    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    62
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2012
    I don't believe so. I have an a 337 and a 363 in a UK 7. I think the 363 is almost 1 cm longer than the 337, although they are actually about the same width. The 363 is probably a bit too long for me, as some extra leather between the toe cap and laces digs back in on the vamp on my shorter foot. The lasting of the 363 makes it look narrower than it really is.

    I am also in the process of deciding between an Audley and Lonsdale. I prefer the round toe but I think the Audley is a better fit.

    I think the Connaught is about 1 cm shorter and 1 cm wider in the UK 7 as compared with the 363.

    Shame they don't make HGs on the 360 any more.
     


  14. BespokeKiwi

    BespokeKiwi Senior member

    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    113
    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2013
    Location:
    New Zealand & South East Asia
    Tuur, ditto.

    I recently purchased a pair of 348 Milton boots and will upload some photos of them shortly. Like yourself, I've been closely studying the rearranged last comparison chart above and am leaning towards the 363 Lonsdale too, for my next C&J purchase of capped Oxford shoes. Also, I'm considering the 341 Radstock too.

    I do prefer the sleek looking (square toe) 348 last, albeit for my C&J Tetbury and Milford boots. I think the small round toes of the 363 last are just as sleek looking as the 348 last however, they are arguably more traditional (classic) in their appearance than the 348 to my (conservative / 50 years old) eyes.

    Of course, this assumes the actual 363 Lonsdale shoes received are as they appear in the above last comparison chart. Good luck with your planned purchase. In my own case, I will provide an update once my new 363 Lonsdale (or 341 Radstock) shoes have been received.
     
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2013


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by