Zain
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2016
- Messages
- 27
- Reaction score
- 3
I thought I would create a thread to compare the proportions of ties from various labels relative to each other. I tended to purchase 8.5 cm (measured at their widest point) ties exclusively until I realized that even with the same measurements at their widest point, the appearance of a tie at your collar can vary quite greatly depending on how aggressively it's tapered.
I think it would be useful to determine whether one can or should go up or down in measurements at the widest point, i.e. ±0.5 cm to 1 cm, when purchasing from a manufacturer that they haven't purchased from yet.
Most aggressively tapered from widest point, i.e. most triangular
Kiton
Vanda
Middle: E. Marinella, Luigi Borrelli, Isaia, Kent Wang, Berg & Berg
Drake's
Tie Your Tie
Least aggressively tapered from widest point, i.e. most bottle-shaped
Kiton is listed as the most aggressively tapered while Tie Your Tie is the least aggressively tapered. I also have a Zegna Venticinque which I would put between Drake's and Tie Your Tie, but I haven't listed it since I suspect their Venticinque/Quindici ties may be cut differently from their main-line ties.
How would I use this list? For example, if I'm accustomed to 8.5 cm Borrelli ties, I would probably look for a Kiton tie that is 9 cm at the widest point. Conversely, if I'm accustomed to 8 cm Drake's ties, I would probably look for 8.5 cm ties when choosing from Borrelli ties. Additionally, if I thought an 8 cm Drake's tie was too thin, I wouldn't bother to look at Isaia ties of 8 cm since I would expect them to be even thinner at the knot point, but might consider a Tie Your Tie tie of 8 cm to be of sufficient width.
The list isn't precise enough to be an exact science. For example, Vanda's cut is so slightly different from the middle pack that I wouldn't necessarily make a change, but there is a stark and noticeable difference at the opposite ends of the scale (i.e., Kiton vs. Tie Your Tie) for which I would certainly take into account the differences in cut/shape.
Additions and suggestions for changes to this list are welcome.
I think it would be useful to determine whether one can or should go up or down in measurements at the widest point, i.e. ±0.5 cm to 1 cm, when purchasing from a manufacturer that they haven't purchased from yet.
Most aggressively tapered from widest point, i.e. most triangular
Kiton
Vanda
Middle: E. Marinella, Luigi Borrelli, Isaia, Kent Wang, Berg & Berg
Drake's
Tie Your Tie
Least aggressively tapered from widest point, i.e. most bottle-shaped
Kiton is listed as the most aggressively tapered while Tie Your Tie is the least aggressively tapered. I also have a Zegna Venticinque which I would put between Drake's and Tie Your Tie, but I haven't listed it since I suspect their Venticinque/Quindici ties may be cut differently from their main-line ties.
How would I use this list? For example, if I'm accustomed to 8.5 cm Borrelli ties, I would probably look for a Kiton tie that is 9 cm at the widest point. Conversely, if I'm accustomed to 8 cm Drake's ties, I would probably look for 8.5 cm ties when choosing from Borrelli ties. Additionally, if I thought an 8 cm Drake's tie was too thin, I wouldn't bother to look at Isaia ties of 8 cm since I would expect them to be even thinner at the knot point, but might consider a Tie Your Tie tie of 8 cm to be of sufficient width.
The list isn't precise enough to be an exact science. For example, Vanda's cut is so slightly different from the middle pack that I wouldn't necessarily make a change, but there is a stark and noticeable difference at the opposite ends of the scale (i.e., Kiton vs. Tie Your Tie) for which I would certainly take into account the differences in cut/shape.
Additions and suggestions for changes to this list are welcome.
Last edited: