Generally, yeah. There are some rough script moments and/or plot holes mixed with some questionable editing in cases (the original cut was apparently 2:27 mins long...) that hurt the film a bit, but top notch cinematography, effects, generally good acting and plot points (or holes in some cases depending upon who you ask) that are getting a lot of people talking as well. Some of the nitpicking/judging based on heritage or what people were expecting is amusing though, some fan boys are going crazy (myself as one on occasion), but there are quite a lot of issues/plot holes/nit picking etc. that can be done on the original films as well... gasp...and people seem to want to ignore that like they were the holy of holy and this is the bastard offspring. No Coors in the film that I saw, and no tie ins over here in France that I've seen either.