Pretentious art writing

Discussion in 'Fine Living, Home, Design & Auto' started by Kent Wang, Mar 28, 2009.

  1. Kent Wang

    Kent Wang Affiliate Vendor Dubiously Honored Affiliate Vendor

    Messages:
    5,731
    Likes Received:
    1,230
    Joined:
    May 5, 2005
    Location:
    London
    I find the text accompanying a lot of modern art quite hilarious. For example:

    [​IMG]

    Jo Baer
    Horizontals Tiered (Vertical Diptych)
    1966
    Oil and synthetic resin on canvas
    132.1 cm x 182.9 cm (52 in. x 72 in.)
    Gift of Mari and James A. Michener, 1968

    Collector James Michener bought this spare, two-part painting during his first visit to the studio Jo Baer shared with her husband at that time, painter John Wesley. Richard Bellamy, a young New York gallerist who had a sharp eye for new talent, served as guide on these scouting excursions, a crucial part of Michener's process of selecting works. Baer's work was notably forward-thinking for its time. She was committed to a rigorously formal approach to abstract painting: her interest was in the visual qualities of the work-its composition, surface, the relationship of depicted space to line and form-rather than in any implied meaning or message. Her aim was to create a painting that emphasized its frontal plane in a way that would echo the wall behind it, suggesting the architectural character of the painting's shape. Indeed, the work echoes its own edges with its two interior border markings, and even replicates itself in two panels, yet it denies any allusion to a window, the conventional association that has accompanied the framed panel or canvas since Renaissance times. The artist has challenged the viewer to regard her minimal work, stripped of the more ingratiating aspects of painting, as absolute in its simplicity.​
    From the University of Texas Blanton Museum of Art in Austin.

    Just for fun I wrote up my own description of a Mondrian homage I painted:

    [​IMG]

    Kent Wang's work fuses chaos with order, with lines and shapes laid randomly - at first glance. Closer inspection gradually reveals that a set of rules governs the placement of shapes and the choice of colors. Thus, the artist challenges the viewer to explore the rules encoded in the subconscious that shape our aesthetics, to consider why we find beauty in the juxtaposition of chaos and order.

    Rather than any implied meaning or message, the minimalist nature of these paintings encourages the viewer to consider the visual qualities of the work - the composition, surfaces, textures and the relationship of depicted space to line and form. In simplicity, art becomes more direct and incisive in its dissection of the human mind, a more lucent mirror of our collective subconscious.​
     


  2. GoSurface

    GoSurface Senior member

    Messages:
    8,488
    Likes Received:
    375
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Yes.

    Big fucking + 1000.
     


  3. robin

    robin Senior member

    Messages:
    12,416
    Likes Received:
    153
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Yes. Big fucking + 1000.
    How would you put your art pieces into words?
    Just for fun I wrote up my own description of a Mondrian homage I painted: http://farm1.static.flickr.com/130/3...b617ce19d0.jpg
    This is pretty cool.
     


  4. Biscotti

    Biscotti Senior member

    Messages:
    4,078
    Likes Received:
    1,324
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    I'm so tired or art, art talk, and artists.
     


  5. GoSurface

    GoSurface Senior member

    Messages:
    8,488
    Likes Received:
    375
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    How would you put your art pieces into words?

    I wouldn't.
     


  6. Bhowie

    Bhowie Senior member

    Messages:
    13,158
    Likes Received:
    3,037
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Location:
    Running the trap house.
    [​IMG]
     


  7. robin

    robin Senior member

    Messages:
    12,416
    Likes Received:
    153
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    I wouldn't.
    Nothing to write about?
     


  8. GoSurface

    GoSurface Senior member

    Messages:
    8,488
    Likes Received:
    375
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Nothing to write about?

    Even if my work was worth writing about, it's all rather fruitless. It's not like words would legitimize my work any better than an emotional connection/response would.
     


  9. GQgeek

    GQgeek Senior member

    Messages:
    17,933
    Likes Received:
    80
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Location:
    Canuckistan
    Did you ever take any literary criticism courses, or courses that had that as a component of them in university? Talk about intellectual masturbation *e^1000000. Some of the essays i've been forced to read have been intollerable. What you posted is benign by comparison.
     


  10. Trapp

    Trapp Senior member

    Messages:
    1,576
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    Location:
    Northern California
    I know what you mean about the text accompanying a lot of modern art, or art in general, being funny or pretentious.

    To be honest, I don't think the above is a good example. The points the writer makes are observable and concrete. For the most part, the language has been chosen in an attempt, first, to put the artist and the painting in a historical context, and then to describe some ideas these two paintings attempt to address. Not everyone has to agree with the writer about the validity of these ideas--or how they apply to the paintings. But I don't see a lot of words or phrases being dropped in an effort to 'sound smart' at the expense of meaning and communication.

    Modern art (not to mention people's attempts to write about it) will always be a ripe target for mockery. It doesn't matter. The good stuff can take it.
     


  11. The Snob

    The Snob Senior member

    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2009
    Location:
    Out of a suitcase
    I know what you mean about the text accompanying a lot of modern art, or art in general, being funny or pretentious.

    To be honest, I don't think the above is a good example. The points the writer makes are observable and concrete. For the most part, the language has been chosen in an attempt, first, to put the artist and the painting in a historical context, and then to describe some ideas these two paintings attempt to address. Not everyone has to agree with the writer about the validity of these ideas--or how they apply to the paintings. But I don't see a lot of words or phrases being dropped in an effort to 'sound smart' at the expense of meaning and communication.

    Modern art (not to mention people's attempts to write about it) will always be a ripe target for mockery. It doesn't matter. The good stuff can take it.


    That was my thought too... this example sounded like the work of a very talented art history grad to me. I think maybe it's just that the painting is so simple that anything more than two lines long seems excessive. Heh.

    Also, great Mondrian knockoff.
     


  12. Huntsman

    Huntsman Senior member

    Messages:
    7,735
    Likes Received:
    469
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    I know what you mean about the text accompanying a lot of modern art, or art in general, being funny or pretentious. To be honest, I don't think the above is a good example. The points the writer makes are observable and concrete. For the most part, the language has been chosen in an attempt, first, to put the artist and the painting in a historical context, and then to describe some ideas these two paintings attempt to address. Not everyone has to agree with the writer about the validity of these ideas--or how they apply to the paintings. But I don't see a lot of words or phrases being dropped in an effort to 'sound smart' at the expense of meaning and communication. Modern art (not to mention people's attempts to write about it) will always be a ripe target for mockery. It doesn't matter. The good stuff can take it.
    The greatest, and most easily supported, criticism of the criticism is that it attempts to say what the artist thinks. I find that incredibly pretentious, indeed, it is the greatest of all the practiced pretenses. ~ H
     


  13. JoeWoah

    JoeWoah Senior member

    Messages:
    3,777
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2007
    Location:
    Hollywood for Ugly People... Washington, DC
    The greatest, and most easily supported, criticism of the criticism is that it attempts to say what the artist thinks. I find that incredibly pretentious, indeed, it is the greatest of all the practiced pretenses.

    ~ H


    They can't all be DADA pieces.
     


  14. Huntsman

    Huntsman Senior member

    Messages:
    7,735
    Likes Received:
    469
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    They can't all be DADA pieces.
    I have no idea what, or if, this means. Dada or no, it's still pretentious to declare that you know what someone thinks. ~ H
     


  15. tagutcow

    tagutcow Senior member

    Messages:
    10,618
    Likes Received:
    682
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Location:
    Greensboro NC
    I have no idea what, or if, this means. Dada or no, it's still pretentious to declare that you know what someone thinks.

    ~ H


    Il n'y a pas de hors-texte, n'est pas?

    Sorry, got carried away with the pretension. I need to transcribe some of the liner notes from my modern classical LPs.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by