Post a pic of a 6 (no ****)

[tagutcow]

Originally Posted by GQgeek

hotornot ratings are inflated. Some of the ugliest ******* girls i've ever seen still get a 5 there.

Having submitted photos to HotorNot myself, I've found that there's a curve to your rating. Usually, a picture starts out with a high score, and gradually gets dragged down over time.

I've gotten dragged down to a 9.2 myself... scary stuff!

 

[gdl203]

tagut, the person in your avatar has a very large belly button

 

[HRoi]

THIS GUY

Originally Posted by gdl203

considers Jessica Alba, Ber Rafaeli, Heidi Klum, and Charlize Theron not date worthy?!

then again, i think Snooki is more his type

 

[ChicagoRon]

Originally Posted by HRoi

THIS GUY considers Jessica Alba, Ber Rafaeli, Heidi Klum, and Charlize Theron not date worthy?!

then again, i think Snooki is more his type
IN a world were Selma Hayak and Julia Roberts are a 7, I'd date a 4

 

[GQgeek]

Originally Posted by tagutcow

Having submitted photos to HotorNot myself, I've found that there's a curve to your rating. Usually, a picture starts out with a high score, and gradually gets dragged down over time.

I've gotten dragged down to a 9.2 myself... scary stuff!

When an ugly chick has a 5 after 1000 votes, I think it becomes statistically significant that the people voting have exceedingly low standards.

 

[Listi]

Originally Posted by ChicagoRon

IN a world were Selma Hayak and Julia Roberts are a 7, I'd date a 4

I was gonna say, Salma Hayek is near the top of my list. I'm not interested in most celebrities, I guess that whole "perfect" look does not do it for me.

 

[three_man]

Originally Posted by GQgeek

When an ugly chick has a 5 after 1000 votes, I think it becomes statistically significant that the people voting have exceedingly low standards.

not reaLLY. its more to do with people not being able to fully rate the person honestly because hot or not is not anonymous.

 

[LA Guy]

Originally Posted by ChicagoRon

IN a world were Selma Hayak and Julia Roberts are a 7, I'd date a 4

STFU. You'd date a 2. You'd date a 2 on my scale depending on the season, and my scale is a Walmart compared to gdl's fancy-dancy Nordstrom.

 

[Harold falcon]

Originally Posted by GQgeek

hotornot ratings are inflated. Some of the ugliest ******* girls i've ever seen still get a 5 there.

Stop hatin', start appreciatin'.

 

[Fuuma]

Originally Posted by GQgeek

When an ugly chick has a 5 after 1000 votes, I think it becomes statistically significant that the people voting have exceedingly low standards.

Judging by your relationships, here is the kind of "girl" that corresponds to your standards:

 

[Prince]

Originally Posted by Listi

I was gonna say, Salma Hayek is near the top of my list. I'm not interested in most celebrities, I guess that whole "perfect" look does not do it for me.

This. Anyone who claims Salma Hayed lacks sexuality has issues man.

 

[EBugatti]

I think one of the problems is scale confusion. The 1-10 scale should be calibrated as follows:

10.00 = Perfection; does not exist in the wild. The perfect girl; flawless.
9.99 = The most beautiful actual living, breathing woman in the world.
9.90 = Extremely attractive; would stop practically all heterosexual men in their tracks.
.
.
.
9.00 = Extremely attractive
8.00 = Very pretty
7.00 = Cute to pretty
6.00 = Mildly pleasing
5.00 = Neither attractive nor unattractive; average
4.00 = Mildly displeasing
3.00 = Unattractive
2.00 = Hideous
.
.
.
1.01 = The ugliest actual living, breathing woman in the world
1.00 = Purely, utterly revolting; does not exist in the wild.

This is a two decimal place version, but it is easily convertible to a 1 decimal or more decimal version.

 

[LA Guy]

Originally Posted by Fuuma

Judging by your relationships, here is the kind of "girl" that corresponds to your standards:


Woah there. Is he cheating with my girlfriend? Uncool.