- Joined
- Jan 18, 2010
- Messages
- 7,623
- Reaction score
- 11,751
Guys, today i was totally surprised by the new Casio Oceanus "Cachalot" good lord it looks amazing in person. the light dances off it.
My question is: at $2,500, is it still a "poor man's watch"?
I have been waiting to get a non-poor mans watch for some time, as i have enough.
But is stepping up to a $2,500 watch, and getting a Casio some sort of irony?
Or is a real flex watch? like the Grand Seiko of sports watches?
BTW, there are some other really nice lookers in the Oceanus range. if not a little "busy" as most Casio seem to be. But still. . . gorgeous.
I thought the Cachalot was closer to $1,600. Still pricey for a Casio but I've read nothing but glowing reviews of the fit and finish on the Oceanus line of watches.
The Oceanus watches aren't really my style but this limited edition "Space Brother" one is absolutely gorgeous:
As for whether a pricy Oceanus qualifies for this thread, I lean towards the more liberal side of things here and that out qualifications shouldn't strictly be limited to price but should also take brand into consideration and I welcome discussion of basically any Casio (or Citizen or Seiko or Orient) here as they get no love over on the other thread and if you aren't posting about some steel sport Rolex you had to wait 30 months for from the AD, you get no traction.