Jazzmenco
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2010
- Messages
- 6,034
- Reaction score
- 11,497
The true is that knowing me I'll probably end up getting both.......I'm a Seiko fanatic, so I'm drawn to the diver.
But, to thine own self be true.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
The true is that knowing me I'll probably end up getting both.......I'm a Seiko fanatic, so I'm drawn to the diver.
But, to thine own self be true.
You have many mechanical watches which need servicing from time to time. This costs more than a battery replacement. A battery replacement is also usually done while you wait.I can deal with quartz as long as it is an eco drive, hate paying for battery changes.
View attachment 1527610 View attachment 1527614
what size is that? Doesn't look unreasonably big, like a lot of divers
39mm case diameterwhat size is that? Doesn't look unreasonably big, like a lot of divers
Good looking watch39mm case diameter
47mm lug to lug
12mm thick
Aquascaphe Classic Blue Gilt - Baltic Watches
Discover the Aquascaphe Blue Gilt, our vision of the purest dive watch. A 39mm toolwatch, waterproof, scratch resistant and shock-proof.baltic-watches.com
‘Good to go’ but not particularly accurate. More so if you ignore servicing.Mechanical watches may need servicing but that doesn't mean they are going to get one.
In my experience, most are good to go for decades without any servicing, if ever at all.
Also, quartz watches are like flamingo-killing Teslas while mechanical watches, especially if with complications, are like manual drive collector's cars. Which one would a petrolhead (watch enthusiast) rather drive?
this is the old quartz versus mechanical argument that has remained unresolved since the quartz "revolution" of the early 1970s.‘Good to go’ but not particularly accurate. More so if you ignore servicing.
Quartz you just forget about maintenance. Radio controlled will be more accurate than the most expensive mechanical watch.
I still don’t know why a £5 battery is a big deal.
Not really. It is about why five quid is a showstopper - particularly for someone who has new watches every month.this is the old quartz versus mechanical argument that has remained unresolved since the quartz "revolution" of the early 1970s.
In my part of the world it costs a lot more than 5 quid. The watch repair guy that I use varies the price based on the value of the watch, even though it's the same battery and basically the same labor. This annoys me along with the annoyance of having to go there. I prefer mechanical and I'm not a person that needs pinpoint accuracy. I do have my share of quartz watches, my point was that the eco drive eliminates the need for battery changes.Not really. It is about why five quid is a showstopper - particularly for someone who has new watches every month.
I can understand people who like mechanical watches. What I can’t work out is why such a trifling amount is a big deal if you then look to purchase a quartz watch.
Is that the Brycen AW1593-06X watch?I can deal with quartz as long as it is an eco drive, hate paying for battery changes.
View attachment 1527610 View attachment 1527614
Yes indeed, I swapped out the strap for something a little nicer. I have a box full of spares.Is that the Brycen AW1593-06X watch?