• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Polo Shirts w/Shorts

pierpont

New Member
Joined
May 5, 2006
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
When wearing a polo shirt with shorts, should the shirt be tucked in or allowed to hang out? Also what kind of shoes go best with that look? Thanks.
 

Joffrey

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
12,311
Reaction score
1,564
Ummm I believe (and I never knew this was an issue) that either way is fine. Untucked is casual, tucked in is more fussy/formal (like if you're a valet). Shoes? Sneakers, flip flops, oxfords (if you're daring), loafers, sandals, really anything except boots.
 

alflauren

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
470
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by Jodum5
tucked in is more fussy/formal (like if you're a valet)

Ding, ding, ding! That why I usually don't tuck mine in. It makes me look like I'm "staff."
 

lawyerdad

Lying Dog-faced Pony Soldier
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
27,006
Reaction score
17,142
Originally Posted by alflauren
Ding, ding, ding! That why I usually don't tuck mine in. It makes me look like I'm "staff."
You sure it's not that "Hi, I'm Alflauren!" pin you insist on wearing?
 

jml90

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
1,584
Reaction score
1
I voted both are OK just because I see nothing wrong with tucking it in besides that you look like you should be on the golf course.
But I prefer to let the tails hang
 

Edward Appleby

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
3,162
Reaction score
5
Sperry Topsiders.
 

mrchapel

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Messages
679
Reaction score
1
I've never tucked in my polos with shorts. Looks incredibly tacky to me, and as said previously, does make you look like a valet or other such worker. Based on the tails of polos, I always assumed they were meant to be worn without being tucked in. But, it's personal preference.
 

Edward Appleby

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
3,162
Reaction score
5
Originally Posted by mrchapel
Based on the tails of polos, I always assumed they were meant to be worn without being tucked in.
Quite the opposite. Despite what Polo.com may say, the long rear tail on polo shirts was not designed for a slimming effect, but to keep the shirt tucked in during vigorous physical activity.

That said, I rarely tuck mine in.
 

oldog/oldtrix

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
938
I'm assuming that you have in mind the wearing of the ubiquitous short sleeved polo with shorts. If that is the case, then it does not matter whether the shirt is worn tucked or untucked, it looks geeky, rather like matching one's tie and pocket square. Better balance/contrast is afforded by wearing long sleeved shirts with shorts. Depending on the style and length of the shirt tail, in or out can look good. And, counterintuitively, the long sleeves can be rolled up and not spoil the effect. As for footwear, everything from the lightest of sandals to the heavyest of work boots can look terrific with shorts, dending on the style and weight of the shorts and the purpose for which they are worn. Boots, however, must be laced not pull-on. I commend to you, Ralph Finnes character, Count Almasy, in The English Patient, as the exemplar extraordinaire of shorts wearing.
 

raley

Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2004
Messages
779
Reaction score
0
I would not tuck it in. Makes it looks like you just got off of the golf course.
 

jayson

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Let it hang out man. Just make sure the cut of the shirt doesnt hang too far past your waist. Put it with some flip flops and you are golden.
 

acidboy

Stylish Dinosaur
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
19,672
Reaction score
1,555
ugh, flipflops again.
britneysspears_flipflops.jpg
Britney Spears is auctioning a whole lot of personal wardrobe items online in the name of charity. Among the many clothing items are several pairs of flip flops, including the pair of J. Crew flippers pictured above.
 

mimiki

Active Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2006
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Although i never tuck, it think both is ok, it really comes down to the individual (age, style & body size)
 

Artisan Fan

Suitsupply-sider
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
32,196
Reaction score
378
I rarely tuck mine in. It's hot in Georgia and I think polos are meant to be comfortable. I also am loathe to wear a T-shirt underneath, in fact I never do. Seems to defeat the purpose.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.3%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 87 38.2%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.5%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 36 15.8%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.8%

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
506,473
Messages
10,589,681
Members
224,250
Latest member
pdfilifestyle
Top