• I'm happy to introduce the Styleforum Happy Hour, our brand new podcast featuring lively discussion about menswear and the fashion industry. In the inaugural edition, a discussion of what's going on in retail today. Please check it out on the Journal. All episodes will be also be available soon on your favorite podcast platform.

  • Styleforum Gives - Holiday Charity Auction 4: Goodyear welted shoes from Cobbler Union

    We are very proud to present this year's edition of the Styleforum Holiday Charity Auctions, this year in support of the Ronald McDonald House Charities of Spokane (www.rmhcspokane.org). Each Auction lasts 24 hours. Please follow and bid on all the auctions.

    The 4th auction is for a pair of Goodyear welted Shoes from Cobbler Union. Please bid often and generously here

    Fok and the Styleforum Team.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

pleat front vs. plain front vs. body type?

wmarson

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi. Do certain body types dictate what type of trousers might look best? Are plain front's typically for thin men and pleats for larger men? I guess my primary question is why would someone choose a pleat trouser over a plain front trouser (and visa-versa)? Thank you.
 

Jovan

Banned for Good
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
2,533
Reaction score
0
Preference mainly. Pleated trousers give you a bit more movement room (and also seem to tent up more when sitting in my experience). No pleats look cleaner and slimmer.

If you're going to pleat, I still say it's best to have the pleats face forward (English) unlike the American or Italian way (reverse). Reversed pleats don't help anyone's physique since they make one's hips seem like they're bulging. I'm sure everyone will argue this with me, but I've worn both types.

Whatever you do, don't go with triple pleated pants. Double is classic, single is a bit more modern.
 

bch

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
281
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by Jovan
Preference mainly. Pleated trousers give you a bit more movement room (and also seem to tent up more when sitting in my experience). No pleats look cleaner and slimmer.

If you're going to pleat, I still say it's best to have the pleats face forward (English) unlike the American or Italian way (reverse). Reversed pleats don't help anyone's physique since they make one's hips seem like they're bulging. I'm sure everyone will argue this with me, but I've worn both types.

Whatever you do, don't go with triple pleated pants. Double is classic, single is a bit more modern.


Wider hips compared to narrow waist make the case for pleats, I think. Otherwise, your pockets might span.
 

Toiletduck

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Messages
2,551
Reaction score
7
Originally Posted by bch
Wider hips compared to narrow waist make the case for pleats, I think. Otherwise, your pockets might span.

I believe what he's trying to say is that wide hips might pull the pockets on plain fronts outwards.

 

psykon99

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
One thing I've noticed myself: while flat fronts do have a slimming effect, particularly on the hips/thighs, that effect may actually work against you overall.

I'm one of those men unfortunate enough to have a nice beer belly (more from junk food than beer, but there's some of that in there too). I tend to wear flats, but I've noticed that by slimming up the look of my thighs / hips, the size of my middle is accentuated. Whereas, when wearing pleats, my lower half seems to match my upper half in size. Then I look uniformly large all the way around but in a good way, not a bad one.
 

teddieriley

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,784
Reaction score
470
Originally Posted by Toiletduck
I believe what he's trying to say is that wide hips might pull the pockets on plain fronts outwards.
In my experience some flat front pants do have a widening effect at the hips not only due to wide hips/muscular legs, but also because of the front pocket placement. If the front pockets are on seam, they don't lay flat against your leg and tend to flare out. Kind of like an oompa loompa. For some reason, I find that some pleated pants (I really don't know the difference between reverse or forward) has a slimming effect at the waist line, despite more room in the thigh/leg area.
 

bch

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
281
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by Toiletduck
I believe what he's trying to say is that wide hips might pull the pockets on plain fronts outwards.

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. Guys with developed glutes and legs (or just prominent rears) might be served better with pleats, since they give more room for a given waist size. I've got a 33" waist and 40" hips. Some flat fronts give me trouble, while others fit fine. I suppose if my hips were a few inches narrower, I would rarely if ever have a problem with flat front pants.
 

NewYorkBuck

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2004
Messages
482
Reaction score
16
I find flat fronts very uncomfortable for a mans personal parts, even w out anything in ones pockets. Whatever slimming effect is lost w pleats is a small price to pay IMO.
 

kronik

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 2, 2006
Messages
3,944
Reaction score
7
I find this thread refreshing - I have a "prominent rear" as mentioned above, which most girls love but needless to say... makes flat front pants look terrible on me, and you can usually count my pubic hairs in the front from looking.

This makes me feel better about having to wear pleats.
 

bch

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
281
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by kronik
....and you can usually count my pubic hairs in the front from looking.

Thanks for the visual, man.
 

designprofessor

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
2,483
Reaction score
4
I see my share of students that are too thick to wear thin flat fronts. It winds up looking ridiculous. They would rather die than wear pleats, but they don't quite get that a little bit of room and drape to their clothes might actually enhance the overall appearance.
 

damonallan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 1, 2005
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
Gents...

This can be a difficult one to get your head around...I agree.

If you're thinking body shapes: O, Cone, Pear, Rectangle, you can always draw out these shapes....ya I know it seems weird.

With the rectangle guy he can wear both if he is of average build. More pleats on a larger/wider man can help to make him look wider.

Take the short portly man as an example. The goal is to slim and lengthen. That can be acheived with flat front or single pleat.

The cone man needs his hips widened a bit to even out his body so even a double pleat will work some wonders here.

As for the Pear, again, pleats can help to widen the look.

I understand that the function of pleats is for comfort when the front is expended esp. when sitting. The portly gentlemen "O" or Pear can do some neat compromising by selecting FLAT FRONTs with SUSPENDARS.

Comments?
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

How many pairs of shoes do you own?

  • 1 - 4

    Votes: 26 3.4%
  • 5 - 10

    Votes: 132 17.3%
  • 11 - 20

    Votes: 249 32.6%
  • 21 - 30

    Votes: 119 15.6%
  • 31 - 40

    Votes: 68 8.9%
  • 41 - 50

    Votes: 47 6.2%
  • 51 - 60

    Votes: 23 3.0%
  • 61 - 70

    Votes: 21 2.7%
  • 71 - 80

    Votes: 16 2.1%
  • 81 - 90

    Votes: 7 0.9%
  • 91 - 100

    Votes: 8 1.0%
  • 100+

    Votes: 48 6.3%

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
428,717
Messages
9,222,987
Members
193,605
Latest member
Lovemybed
Top