• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Pants rise?

johnnynorman3

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
2,702
Reaction score
25
(Fashionslave @ May 23 2005,15:32) I've noticed some of the vintage Savile Row suits I own have a long or high rise,more like 12.5".Was this the norm for vintage?
I think it has less to do with when they were made than how they were made to be worn. Â Brace trousers need a higher rise. Â Belt trousers cut that high will just slip down; they need a slightly lower rise to stay in place.
I guess that depends upon how fat you are. Personally, I prefer about a 12" rise (I'm 5'10" and have a 30 inch inseam when using a half break) on my suit and dress trousers. Any less and they either sit too low, or if I pull them up they can be a bit uncomfortable when sitting.
 

Manton

RINO
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
41,314
Reaction score
2,879
I guess that depends upon how fat you are.
Not so much fat as shape. Few men have a waist that is narrow enough at the sides to hold up trousers without suspenders, unless the waistband is so tight as to make the trousers excruciating to wear. Women, on the other hand ...
 

LA Guy

Opposite Santa
Admin
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2002
Messages
57,517
Reaction score
36,347
(johnnynorman3 @ May 23 2005,15:44) I guess that depends upon how fat you are.
Not so much fat as shape. Â Few men have a waist that is narrow enough at the sides to hold up trousers without suspenders, unless the waistband is so tight as to make the trousers excruciating to wear. Â Women, on the other hand ...
In order to have this shape, you essentially have to be Brad Pitt fit, i.e. with a waist/ratio no higher than 0.9. Not easy to do. I've been trying halfheartedly for a while, but resisting the calzone is difficult.
 

johnnynorman3

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
2,702
Reaction score
25
Late night calzone runs end with marriage, LA Guy -- I speak from experience.
 

esvoboda

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I think plain-front trousers can be worn with a slightly lower rise than pleated-front trousers, all things being equal.

LA Guy: Thanks for your recommendations.
 

Oddly Familiar

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
189
Reaction score
1
(Manton @ May 23 2005,12:58) You essentially have to be Brad Pitt fit, i.e. with a waist/ratio no higher than 0.9. Â Not easy to do. Â I've been trying halfheartedly for a while, but resisting the calzone is difficult.
Please explain to me what a waist ratio is. I've never heard of that before.
 

LA Guy

Opposite Santa
Admin
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2002
Messages
57,517
Reaction score
36,347
I hadn't either, until BrianSD mentioned it. Essentially, it describes the ratio of the waist to the hip diameters.

Apparently (according to something Brian read), the ratio most men find most attractive in women is 0.7. and the ratio most women find most attractive in a man is 0.9. The thread was discussing what men and women find attractive, and Brian's post contended (and I agree) that most guys find fit but not ridiculously skinny women most attractive, and most women find fit, but not Ahnold fit, guys attractive - Brad Pitt is more of the ideal for most women. Now you know all about that thread (I think that it was in the general topics forum.)
 

von Rothbart

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
2,460
Reaction score
17
Is pants rise simply the difference between outseam and inseam? Or you have take the curvature into account by measuring from top of waistband along the zipper to bottom of crotch where the 4 pieces of cloth seamed together?
 

Luc-Emmanuel

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
1,580
Reaction score
17
I'm 0,89
biggrin.gif
.luc
 

naturlaut

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2003
Messages
565
Reaction score
3
You've lost me on the ratio thing, but regarding pants rise --- classically speaking, the rise of the pants should be around where you button your jacket, thus little (or even no) shirt around the waist is shown between where you button your jacket and the trousers waist. However, button stance used to be a bit lower, hence the higher rise in pants who are cut in the old style (12 1/2", 12 3/4" or thereabouts) like Incotex. Button stance has been on a rise the past 50 years or so, but the rise of the pants hasn't changed much except going lower and lower. RTW Neapolitan makers have a short rise of 11" (or mostly around 11 1/2"), so if your shirt waist aren't tailored right, it will look very ugly.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.4%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 87 38.3%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 35 15.4%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.9%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,450
Messages
10,589,458
Members
224,248
Latest member
sevenspaceinterior
Top