• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

On becoming a professional poker player

Pennglock

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
3,431
Reaction score
535
Originally Posted by bawlin
Online = Gay

Seriously, I don't see the appeal of online play. I've had some success online, but there's no fun in it. I much prefer going to the casino, where even if I lose a bit, I can enjoy myself at the table.


The appeal is playing many tables at once. Since there are more hands played per hour, you can earn a higher wage playing at much lower limits, hence making more money on a smaller bankroll.

Live players, at almost any limits, are generally a joke. I still sometimes find myself in AC ad even at the 10-20 tables there is rarely more than 1 other person who is able to push it and make moves.
 

GQgeek

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
16,568
Reaction score
84
Originally Posted by bawlin
Online = Gay

Seriously, I don't see the appeal of online play. I've had some success online, but there's no fun in it. I much prefer going to the casino, where even if I lose a bit, I can enjoy myself at the table.


My boss can't win consistently online either, and that's his opinion too.
devil.gif


Anyway, sitting in live games can be torturous until you have a real bankroll. Online=More hands per hour. You don't have to sit waiting for minutes at a time while some fish decides how he's going to play his pocket pair on a rag board. For a new player, the benefits of playing online are enormous:
a) he can play at limits which aren't typically available in live games. That means he doesn't need a huge bankroll to make it through the variance. He can build his bankroll from scratch starting with $50 bucks.
b)He can also measure his progress and use software to analyse his play and plug leaks. The sooner you plug leaks in your game, the better. It's much more difficult to do without the aid of a poker database.
c)far more hands per hour. You see way more hands and get the knowledge/experience that comes with it.
d) once you're winning, multi-tabling can bring bonuses of its own, just through volume of play.
e)play whenever you want. if you are feeling off it's easy to just switch off the computer and come back in a couple hours. Of course, tilt-control is a skill in its own.
f)you learn by playing against better opponents, and in general, the caliber of player is simply higher online these days.
 

tiecollector

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
6,790
Reaction score
25
Had a friend who used to clean up at poker nights with the guys. At a casino he never came out ahead.

Knew someone who got laid off and wrote some partypoker scripts to play 20 tables at a time for him. He ended up making about $200/hr 24/7, probably still does.

Your best bet at making money is probably calling the aggressive betting Asian ladies at the casinos.
 

Aperipan

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2008
Messages
618
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by tiecollector
Had a friend who used to clean up at poker nights with the guys. At a casino he never came out ahead.

Knew someone who got laid off and wrote some partypoker scripts to play 20 tables at a time for him. He ended up making about $200/hr 24/7, probably still does.

Your best bet at making money is probably calling the aggressive betting Asian ladies at the casinos.


I think he'll make more money selling the scripts.
 

jim_n

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
190
Reaction score
48
let me be the first to say grinding a bankroll at micro and small stakes online becomes horrendously boring.
 

Viktri

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2007
Messages
1,104
Reaction score
5
Poker is a good paying job. I have 2 buddies who are into it. The money is very good (talking $150k USD+ in this economy) and the hours are pretty good (iirc, 3,000 hands a day is considered alot).

If you are serious, expect to spend lots of time reading books, charting progress, and looking for whales. The hours are whenever the whales are on as you don't really make money off of each other.

I was looking at doing this on the side of extra money but I came to the conclusion that it is a full time job. You don't make money by doing a half assed job as the results aren't linear (with respect to hours put in).
 

dusty

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
4,780
Reaction score
20
Is this some white people grifter fantasy?
 

Henry Boogers

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,424
Reaction score
26
Originally Posted by bawlin
Online = Gay

Seriously, I don't see the appeal of online play. I've had some success online, but there's no fun in it. I much prefer going to the casino, where even if I lose a bit, I can enjoy myself at the table.


I used to play as a sort of 'side-job' and strongly preffered online for 3 reasons:

1. Online poker is about 3x as fast as the live game plus you can multi-table. Depending on a number of factors I would play 4-8 tables on 2 21" monitors. 1 hour at my desk was equal to 24 hours live if I played all 8 tables.

2. 6-player tables. I love 6 player NL and tend to do best there. I had more 6-person NL tables on my 2 monitors than you could find in all of Las Vegas.

3. Variance. Swings. The standard deviation of this ***** we call poker. If you assume that you are just as good at live 1000 NL as online 200 NL what is the difference in your long-term win rate at 1 live game of 1000NL vs. 5 online games of 200 NL? There is none - but the variance will be WAY lower on the 5 games of 200 NL. This keeps crazy swings at bay, keeps you playing level headed and if you can't get professional gambler status with the IRS it keeps your taxes down. The reasons here are complicated and I need to get back to work.

Oh - any my advice is to do anything but play poker professionally unless this is your only talent in life. Given that it's not even a talent of yours yet I would forget it.
 

Henry Boogers

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,424
Reaction score
26
Originally Posted by dusty
Is this some white people grifter fantasy?

Yes.

When I tell people I did it to replace my Wife's salary when she left work to start a family people envisioned me in a black suit with dark glasses smoking a cigar while shuffling stacks of $10,000 in cash on my desk at home with girls in swimsuits rubbing my back. It was more like me coming home from work, stripping down to my underwear and playing 2 monitors at a time while watching Everybody Loves Raymond re-runs in the background.
 

Fuuma

Franchouillard Modasse
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
26,949
Reaction score
14,542
Online poker and all this stat bullshit make that game sound so boring it's not even funny. You're basically describing the lifestyle of people who play online games and sell their magical items on ebay or whatever.
 

constant struggle

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
5,096
Reaction score
115
goodluck
i played hours and hours and hours, i ended up realizing i was making like 1 dollar an hour, it wasn't even worth it, i hardly ever play now

i would rather just play live games for fun with some friends (which is still a very competitive game, as everyone has thousands of hours of playing under their belts)
 

Henry Boogers

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,424
Reaction score
26
Originally Posted by Fuuma
Online poker and all this stat bullshit make that game sound so boring it's not even funny. You're basically describing the lifestyle of people who play online games and sell their magical items on ebay or whatever.

A fair assesment, hence the recommendation to not pursue this as a career.
 

GQgeek

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
16,568
Reaction score
84
Originally Posted by Henry Boogers
Oh - any my advice is to do anything but play poker professionally unless this is your only talent in life. Given that it's not even a talent of yours yet I would forget it.

Everyone wants to be the next CTS.

Anyway, I disagree with Fuuma about the stats. Doing regular analysis of your play allows you to become a better player by identifying tendencies that are -EV. It's much much harder to do that without a database.
 

Fuuma

Franchouillard Modasse
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
26,949
Reaction score
14,542
Originally Posted by GQgeek
Everyone wants to be the next CTS.

Anyway, I disagree with Fuuma about the stats. Doing regular analysis of your play allows you to become a better player by identifying tendencies that are -EV.


I'm not saying it won't work (I dunno **** about poker) I'm saying being the kid that plays multiple games of poker online while running stats on how to improve himself is basically avoiding the only interesting part of the game (the edgy social interractions, psychological games and whatnot) and it's a miserable lifestyle. Online poker is to regular poker what porno sites are to getting laid.
 

GQgeek

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
16,568
Reaction score
84
Originally Posted by Fuuma
I'm not saying it won't work (I dunno **** about poker) I'm saying being the kid that plays multiple games of poker online while running stats on how to improve himself is basically avoiding the only interesting part of the game (the edgy social interractions, psychological games and whatnot) and it's a miserable lifestyle. Online poker is to regular poker what porno sites are to getting laid.

Lifestyle partly depends on how good you are. If you've got the skills, the discipline, and the mental toughness, you can make well over six figures playing 2-3 hours a day, even at small stakes. CTS makes 7 figures playing poker, and he spends a lot of his time travelling all over the place doing really cool **** with the money he makes. That's a pretty awesome lifestyle. He's an exceptional player, but my buddy who is merely a very good player clears 10k/mo playing 15 hours a week. There aren't any jobs that pay that well and give you that much time off that I know of. He lives in a nice condo and doesn't work. He travels a lot. He gets to spend the majority of his time doing the things he likes doing, as opposed to working. He could make more but he's lazy.

Now if someone sits infront of their flat screen grinding 8+ tables at the lower limits for 8 hours a day, I'd agree that the lifestyle would suck. I don't think many people actually do that though. Your brain just gets tired too fast when you are multi-tabling unless you are playing well below your skill level.

And there is still a large psychological component in online play, but it mostly comes from an observance of HOW your opponents play (bet sizing, aggressiveness on various streets, etc.) and a self-conciousness about your own table image plus and ability to act on it. I think that the biggest psychological challenge in poker is always how you deal with your own losses though. You have to be pretty damned tough to ride out the bad beats if you are playing professionally and depending on poker for your income. Variance is a total *****. People sometimes have downswings spanning thousands of hands. That is why bankroll management is so important.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 86 38.1%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 35 15.5%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.9%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,443
Messages
10,589,439
Members
224,242
Latest member
BertaCarty
Top