hpreston
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2011
- Messages
- 3,521
- Reaction score
- 7,299
There's a historical swordfighting guy who critiques movie sword fights. He did all the Star Wars movies.
Not surprisingly, he liked the OOT the most. Less flashy, mostly based on real styles, they actually look like they're trying to hit each other.
The critique of the prequels is not surprising, too many goddam spins and twirls. It looks impressive at first glance but it gets really ridiculous en masse. There are definitely some good phrases though.
Sequels, more or less the same as my critique. Everything is too heavy. You don't need to swing for the fences. Also reverse grip is terrible, stop using it Hollywood. Especially with a light saber, you'd get your damn arms lopped off.
On rewatch I'm still not sure whether I like the saber battles from the prequels or sequels better. The sequels obviously tried to be the anti-prequels (no spins/twirls/silly jumps), but they overdid it by making the weapons look clumsy instead of the "elegant weapon, from a more civilized age" that a lot of us fell in love with.
I saw his video about the recent Obi Wan series.
On the topic of sequel vs prequel lightsaber duels, this is an interesting conversation. Just isolating the lightsaber duels from the rest of the films.....
I prefer the sequel duels, since they were essentially kids, with either little (Kylo Renn) to no (Rey) formal lightsaber training. The prequel duels were way too choreographed and flashy to the point of being ridiculous.