STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I find the "despecialized" versions a little distracting, since they're assembled from a bunch of different sources that are in varying degrees of repair. Not that that's unusual for older movies, but it stands out, especially when they're composited into one frame. Like Vader's fuzzy eyebrows, though I think that was fixed (or at least mitigated) in the new despecialized version.
Someone pointed me to a scan of an original reel of the first Star Wars movie, which, although a bit grainy, is more consistent and natural looking. I prefer it. I don't know if there's similar versions out there for the other two movies.
I'd almost rather Disney keep the films in December and make it a new tradition.
Despecialized? I'll look into this. Is this a reference to the original version?
Despecialized? I'll look into this. Is this a reference to the original version?
I'll let him give you the specifics, but I think it is a fanatical fan's restoration, de-stupidfying, re-color balancing and other edits to get the movie to look like the best, most sensible version possible. From what little I have read, it was an insane amount of work. In any event, the result is great.
On the other hand, I am watching his version of ROTJ and inside Jabba's palace is still an awful puppet show. And it will only get worse.
I find the "despecialized" versions a little distracting, since they're assembled from a bunch of different sources that are in varying degrees of repair. Not that that's unusual for older movies, but it stands out, especially when they're composited into one frame. Like Vader's fuzzy eyebrows, though I think that was fixed (or at least mitigated) in the new despecialized version.
Someone pointed me to a scan of an original reel of the first Star Wars movie, which, although a bit grainy, is more consistent and natural looking. I prefer it. I don't know if there's similar versions out there for the other two movies.
Dopey did a fair job giving the overview but I'll get into it again sometime in the morning. Dog tired and about to pass out. You can also search this thread for good info I've posted in the past on them.
Ataturk makes a fair point as sometimes the footage they use is a little rough. Still I find them the best all around versions available. All the changes Lucas made for the special editions are removed and more often then not the color balance is better then the recent Blu Ray editions.
Most of all they represent a love letter to the films. The amount of work that went into creating HD copies of the unaltered versions of these films is insane.
I find the "despecialized" versions a little distracting, since they're assembled from a bunch of different sources that are in varying degrees of repair. Not that that's unusual for older movies, but it stands out, especially when they're composited into one frame. Like Vader's fuzzy eyebrows, though I think that was fixed (or at least mitigated) in the new despecialized version.
The puppets in Jabba's palace were done in the style that was predominant in those days with the technology they had. Think The Dark Crystal and even a show like Fraggle Rock. I have always felt like while not "realistic" the Jabba puppets had a certain personality to them that helped with any form of suspension of belief I was struggling with.
I have always felt like the hatred for Ewoks was exaggerated, but understandable on the part of the community. All the Jabba stuff, I am fine with. It worked in the context of the film at the time it was made. I don't want them to touch any of it.