STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Reedo, are you in Portland? I saw a pasty lookalike in Sac
The problem is they don't force people to do price drops for a bump anymore. Because of this, things sit there far longer without any movement downward in price. Takes away the excitement for buyers and has hurt sellers themselves even if they don't realize it.
I've been contemplating taking away unpaid bumps altogether, and increasing the premium seller prices, so that sellers have an incentive to either 1) set prices low enough that they will sell very quickly, or 2) actually time price drops with bumps so that they make the best use of them (right now, $1 for a bump does not adequately disincentivize unrealistically high prices.)
Also, um, it's not a one item, one listing system. Read the rules, people.
Superfuture essentially has an everything goes system. It works only because there is 5 years of inertia, but a lot of users (me included), hate it, for obvious reasons, so we are not going to go that route.
Reverting to the old system (the bolded part) is absolutely not going to happen.
1) People can't do basic arithmetic or read rules, and we ended up doing a lot of moderation for nothing in return.
2) Also, not going to happen. The system was abused mercilessly. In the present implementation, you can comment, and it does nothing to bump, which is fair to all, and discourages asshat behavior, like bumping for friends, bumping each other's threads, etc...
The pay to bump system is here to stay. The concept is sound - we just have to adjust prices so that we get the fastest turnover in the market. Right now, there is no disincentive, because of the low prices (laughably low, actually) to drop prices. However, if a price drop is, say, $20 a pop, then sellers have pressure to price such that they will find buyers quickly, and/or to drop prices such that they do not spend inordinate amounts on bumps. Of course, if they just want to wait, that's fine too, but if you take away the autobump, or adjust it to once a month, that type of behavior, which makes the market stagnant, is discouraged. After Pitti, I'm going to take a serious look at the activity in B&S, see if there is a real problem, and adjust the pricing structures to address them if they exist.
Don't know which is more annoying...
people repeatedly asking for codes posted in the prior page
OR
people seeking further discounts or complaining when discounts are already at 50% +
OR
the same ******* joke over-and-over again mocking the above two groups of people looking for discounts in a coupon thread
OR
anything whatever123 posts
Sounds like a solid business model to me
Oki-Ni currently deducting a further 20% off sale items once added to the shopping bag.
What about VAT? I'm ready to pull the trigger on something but VAT is the only hold up.