• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

whorishconsumer

King Douche
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
5,837
Reaction score
7,239
Minor gripe for New Yorkers: Mr. P doesn't consider the subtotal post-20% discount for tax purposes, but the subtotal prior to this discount. Hence items that would fall below the $110 threshold for city residents are nonetheless taxed.
 
Last edited:

LA Guy

Opposite Santa
Admin
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2002
Messages
57,550
Reaction score
36,398
Minor gripe for New Yorkers: Mr. P doesn't consider the subtotal post-20% discount for tax purposes, but the subtotal prior to this discount. Hence items that would fall below the $110 threshold for city residents are nonetheless taxed.
What is the rationale for that? I'm guessimg that it's not a progressive tax rate.
 

qubed

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2012
Messages
271
Reaction score
283
What is the rationale for that? I'm guessimg that it's not a progressive tax rate.

I always assumed it was because clothing is an essential item, to minimize the cost to lower-income families, similar to how non-prepared foods are tax-free in a lot of states.

Maybe also a little bit of NYC tourism incentivization too, since it's both NYS & NYC sales tax that are exempt, but I couldn't find much evidence for the original purpose of the legislation.

A legislator tried to increase it recently, and here's what they said:

The current tax exemption on clothing and footwear has not been adjusted
since 1998, nearly twenty five years ago, when it was set at one hundred
and ten dollars. Due to the increase in costs to produce these items, as
well as the recent jump in inflation, this number should be adjusted to
two hundred and fifty dollars to help our businesses and encourage
purchases of these products here in NYS. There is currently no tax on
clothing or footwear in Pennsylvania, putting our business and residents
at a significant disadvantage.
 

Trayco

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 30, 2019
Messages
1,890
Reaction score
6,105
I always assumed it was because clothing is an essential item, to minimize the cost to lower-income families, similar to how non-prepared foods are tax-free in a lot of states.

Maybe also a little bit of NYC tourism incentivization too, since it's both NYS & NYC sales tax that are exempt, but I couldn't find much evidence for the original purpose of the legislation.

A legislator tried to increase it recently, and here's what they said:
Also neighboring New Jersey has no tax on clothing so they were losing sales.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 88 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 88 37.6%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 25 10.7%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 38 16.2%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.4%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,712
Messages
10,591,462
Members
224,316
Latest member
Wilmalotties
Top