Gullit made a persuasive point last night on ESPN: Maicon shot with the outside of his right foot not the inside. Very likely he meant to shoot it. Having seen Maicon's exploits with Inter, I believe Ruud is correct. I heard Ruud's point. It made no sense. Yes, of course he struck it with the outside of his foot. Nobody was debating that. The debate was about whether he intended to hit it with the outside of his foot. He very well could have been intending to hit it with the inside of his foot to cross it, but miss hit the ball on the outside of his foot. Pointing out that he hit it with the outside was an obvious observation. What we don't know is whether that's what he was trying to actually do.