objective conscienceness

[matadorpoeta]

is it obtainable by man?

 

[leftover_salmon]

Is this supposed to be a profoundly thought-provoking or something?

 

[caelte]

Originally Posted by matadorpoeta

is it obtainable by man?
What is it?

 

[j]

I don't think conscienceness is a word.

 

[DNW]

Originally Posted by j

I don't think conscienceness is a word.

+1

 

[p.trick]

Originally Posted by j

I don't think conscienceness is a word.

It is what the wealthy lack, the poor have, and if you eat it you will die.

 

[redcaimen]

Originally Posted by p.trick

It is what the wealthy lack, the poor have, and if you eat it you will die.

Pork Rinds?

 

[designprofessor]

possible? yes, but often too late.

 

[Lucky Strike]

Originally Posted by LabelKing

You Kant always get what you want.

 

[lawyerdad]

Originally Posted by j

I don't think conscienceness is a word.

So then you're voting "no" on a technicality?

 

[Fuuma]

Originally Posted by lawyerdad

So then you're voting "no" on a technicality?

Shouldn't this be something you would approve of?

What does the op means anyway?

 

[lawyerdad]

Originally Posted by Fuuma

Shouldn't this be something you would approve of?

What does the op means anyway?

Absolutely -- j's my boy.

I think he means objective consciousness.

 

[fareau]

Originally Posted by lawyerdad

I think he means objective consciousness.

Well then,

I think therefore I

- Descartes

 

[Rome]

Originally Posted by matadorpoeta

is it obtainable by man?

A collective consciousness would be the closest I guess, since it belongs to all and none at once. An objective consciousness for the individual would be near impossible since being is integral to the process. Although without its possibility what would all those Buddhist aim for?

 

[eg1]

Originally Posted by matadorpoeta

is it obtainable by man?

Where is Vaclav when we need him?