• We would like to welcome Pete and Harry as an official Affiliate Vendor. Pete and Harry, co-founded by Erik (EFV) one of our long time members and friends, offers a wide variety of products, clothes, watches and accessories, antique, vintage, “pre-loved” and new - all at unparalleled prices. Please visit their new thread and give them a warm welcome.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Number of Shoes = Number of Shoe Trees?

Gatsby

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2004
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering about the importance of having shoe trees in your shoes at ALL times when you are not wearing them. I understand the benefits of putting them in right after taking them off your feet to absorb moisture, but perhaps after a day or two with trees on, wouldn't it be perfectly OK to take them out without any ill consequences?

Just wondering if anyone has any better information.
 

cuffthis

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
826
Reaction score
4
1 pair of trees for each pair of shoes. Period.

I even have trees for my running shoes.
 

kabert

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Messages
2,093
Reaction score
5
I don't have shoes trees for running shoes, boat shoes and the like, but I do have them for every pair of dress shoes and business casual-type shoes (such as bucks and loafers).
 

AlanC

Minister of Trad
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
7,805
Reaction score
83
Yes, that's the ideal situation. I have for brief periods had my number of shoes slightly outstrip my current supply of trees. When that happens I will rob shoetrees from a lesser pair that haven't been worn for a few days to put them in the pair I'm taking off at the moment. That ought to be a temporary situation, of course. I will confess, however, that I don't have shoe trees for my athletic shoes....
 

Fabienne

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
4
But has anyone ever done a comparative study: shoe tree versus none, shoes worn under similar circumstances? I never use shoe trees, and my shoes are all in great shape. So I wonder.
 

NewYorkBuck

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2004
Messages
482
Reaction score
16
I have over 10 pairs of dress shoes, but only 2 pairs of trees. I rotate them as I wear the shoes. I heard that leaving trees in shoes can stretch them out, so I only leave them in for a day or two.
 

markr

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2004
Messages
107
Reaction score
1
I've also heard that really you only need 1-2 pairs of shoe trees. The purpose of the shoe trees is to remove excess moisture from and retain the shape of shoes that have recently been worn. Therefore, once the shoes have dried out, you can remove the shoe trees and use them with another pair of shoes. I admit that I have not conducted a scientific study to confirm the soundness of this thinking.
 

tdial

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2004
Messages
248
Reaction score
0
I have conducted a scientific study of shoe trees that is now ready for publication here on The Style Forum. During the study, I used 4 pairs of shoes: a brown C&J Savile, a black C&J Whitehall, a brown C&J Whitehall, and a black C&J Aintree. I used all C&J shoes for this study to set equal the leather variables used.

Over a 120-day period, I wore each shoe once every four days for a 12 hour period. Upon removal, I placed cedar Zappos shoe trees in the brown Savile and the black Whitehall. The brown Whitehall and the black Aintree were left without trees for the duration. Here are my findings:

The shoe-tree treated shoes experienced a 17% reduction in wetness within 24 hours of having the shoe trees placed in them after wear. After 3 days, the level of wetness had dissipated. The shoes also experienced a .12% increase in width do to the stretching factor of the shoe trees, though this was undetectable unless wearing cashmere socks which tended to slide in the shoe and increase wetness significantly (See TDial, J, Fabienne, 1.23.05, "Cashmere Wetness Study").

The untreated (un-"tree"ted, if you will) shoes experienced a 12% decrease in wetness over the first 24 hours due to air drying and Bernese Mountain Dog tampering (dog may have actually added wetness due to slobbering mouth, though slobber level was not measured). After 3 days, the wetness had also dissipated to an undetectable level. Shoes experienced a .12% decrease in overall width due to the air drying of the leather.

Overall, though the findings were someone inconclusive, due to the fact that I only actually own three of the mention shoes and the black Aintree is only a dream, we recommend buying shoe trees for all shoes. Scientifically speaking, it's better to be safe than sorry and the added weight of the shoe tree in the shoe makes it very difficult for small and large breeds of dog to carry away to other parts of your dwelling.

I hope you find this helpful.
 

tiger02

Militarist
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,797
Reaction score
2
That's a good start tdial, but I think we're going to need some data on introduced slobber (IS). For instance, I would like to extrapolate for the effects I may see from my larger Malamut, as well as smaller Cocker Spaniel. Then too, will IS increase for, say, EG shoes while decreasing for a lowly pair of J&M? I have to guess that Italian shoes will induce a higher IS than comparable price/quality American and especially British shoes, since everyone knows Italians are the best cooks, while no one knows what IS is likely for Vass (have you ever had Hungarian other than goulash? Didn't think so.)

Tom

*Note--for possible non-presence of dogs, see tdial's note on Black Aintree
 

Fabienne

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
4
I have conducted a scientific study of shoe trees that is now ready for publication here on The Style Forum. During the study, I used 4 pairs of shoes: a brown C&J Savile, a black C&J Whitehall, a brown C&J Whitehall, and a black C&J Aintree. I used all C&J shoes for this study to set equal the leather variables used. Over a 120-day period, I wore each shoe once every four days for a 12 hour period. Upon removal, I placed cedar Zappos shoe trees in the brown Savile and the black Whitehall. The brown Whitehall and the black Aintree were left without trees for the duration. Here are my findings: The shoe-tree treated shoes experienced a 17% reduction in wetness within 24 hours of having the shoe trees placed in them after wear. After 3 days, the level of wetness had dissipated. The shoes also experienced a .12% increase in width do to the stretching factor of the shoe trees, though this was undetectable unless wearing cashmere socks which tended to slide in the shoe and increase wetness significantly (See TDial, J, Fabienne, 1.23.05, "Cashmere Wetness Study"). The untreated (un-"tree"ted, if you will) shoes experienced a 12% decrease in wetness over the first 24 hours due to air drying and Bernese Mountain Dog tampering (dog may have actually added wetness due to slobbering mouth, though slobber level was not measured). After 3 days, the wetness had also dissipated to an undetectable level. Shoes experienced a .12% decrease in overall width due to the air drying of the leather. Overall, though the findings were someone inconclusive, due to the fact that I only actually own three of the mention shoes and the black Aintree is only a dream, we recommend buying shoe trees for all shoes. Scientifically speaking, it's better to be safe than sorry and the added weight of the shoe tree in the shoe makes it very difficult for small and large breeds of dog to carry away to other parts of your dwelling. I hope you find this helpful.
Thanks for the laugh..
Do you feel the shoe trees would similarly be a deterrent to a toddler with a shoe fetish, or can you offer subsequent scientific advice?
 

Alexis

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
I would like to see the analysis performed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis which includes the fixed categorical effects of treatment, investigator, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, as well as the continuous fixed covariates of baseline score and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
 

LA Guy

Opposite Santa
Admin
Moderator
Joined
Mar 8, 2002
Messages
50,600
Reaction score
27,364

jester

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
186
Reaction score
0
Hey, if Nicholson Baker can write an entire novel about shoelace-breakage, surely someone would fund research into shoe trees.
 

Bradford

Current Events Moderator
Joined
Mar 19, 2002
Messages
6,690
Reaction score
174
Hey, if Nicholson Baker can write an entire novel about shoelace-breakage, surely someone would fund research into shoe trees.
Ahh - The Mezzanine - wonderful novel. Nice to see our sartorial discussions take a turn to the literary. Bradford P.S. I feel like this post requires a footnote
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

How often do you get a haircut?

  • Every 2 weeks

  • Every 3 weeks

  • Once a month

  • Every 6 weeks or longer


Results are only viewable after voting.

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
464,089
Messages
10,024,015
Members
209,358
Latest member
MrPierson
Top