johnapril
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2004
- Messages
- 5,600
- Reaction score
- 11
Well Johnapril, what can I say. They will kill you!Originally Posted by Big Brown
Big girls don't cry.
We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Well Johnapril, what can I say. They will kill you!Originally Posted by Big Brown
The telephone records of when Nicole was last talking to her mother was concealed from the "Trier of fact"/the jury in both trials. Why? Because the time on the telephone records would have placed OJ in the LAX terminal while his wife was on the phone. In order to put on this show, "The trial of the century", both sides agreed to conceal the records from the jury by entering an apparent bogus time for that last phone call.Originally Posted by Big Brown
So government and T.V. tabloid news commentators, dildos like Geraldo et al, have given you the green light to turn off your thinking caps, again ??? The onlyOriginally Posted by Big Brown
My finger's tired...Originally Posted by Tck13
Originally Posted by rnoldh
Why the hell would OJ's attorneys agree to suppress evidence that would help exonerate him? I know this is flame, but can't you at least make it somewhat plausible??Originally Posted by bryce330
Originally Posted by Tck13
Originally Posted by Big Brown
NoOriginally Posted by Big Brown
ALL of the DNA is "he said she said"?Now relative to your Simpson questions, you have a littany of 'he said-she said' subjective issues. I will rebutt them in this manner: (1.) There is a time contradiction of major proportion of when Nicole was last known to be alive, the original time that Nicole's father (Lou Brown) gave to the coroner's investigator in the morning after the deaths occurred was 11:00 PM. If she was alive at 11:00 PM, O.J. was on his way to LAX in the back of a chauffeur driven limousine, rushing to catch an 11:45 PM flight to Chicago, and thus could not have been available to commit the acts. An 11:00 PM telephone call was consistent with highway traveling time conditions for the date 06/12/94.
How do you explain the picture?(3.) Bruno Maglis, that's another topic altogether.....This Italian, European size 46, shoe sole is 12 and-a-quarter inches, (we have several from SILGA the manufacturer). Simpson's bare foot measures 13 inches. When was the last time you bought an expensive shoe that was an inch shorter than your actual foot. I'm sure that those would be shoes worth admiring.
William Bodziack, an FBI agent and one of the country's most foremost experts on shoe print impressions, testified that the prints were left by Bruno Magli shoes, style Lorenzo, incorporating a Silga sole with a waffle-type print. The footwear, manufactured in Italy, retailed for $160 per pair and was sold by only 40 retailers across America. In all, only 300 pairs of size 12 (Simpson's size) were ever sold. Only 9% of the population wore size 12. Simpson had denied ever owing a pair, calling them, "ugly-ass shoes."
However, on September 26th, 1993, AP photographer Harry Scull Jr. had taken pictures of Simpson wearing these exact shoes at the Rich Stadium in New York. It didn't seem to impress the jury.
See above...(4.) The shoe print is unique, however the shoe sole is generic, it comes from the U2887 rubber mold, and it was sold at the same time to 19 other shoe brands controlled by LORD shoes. Any of those 19 along with the Bruno Maglis would make the same shoe print in blood. Also the photos show shoe prints that are less than 11 and-a-half inches in length at the Bundy murder site, almost 2" shorter than Simpson's foot.
Thanks, I knew that already since I've been posting here much longer than you. But, then, you should've known that since you're an investigator.Originally Posted by Tck13
Um, yeah. You really lost me on that one. Simpson's and victims DNA were everywhere. Pretty simple....if you're cruising in a jet airplane at 30,000 feet off the ground and your significant other, at the same time, is on the ground, alive and well, talking to their mother, what else is one to conclude about the DNA.
Yeah, that's it.STEEEER! Give me a break! An important part of the civil trial was the defense witness testifying about digital photo altering. Geez! Have you seen how good Oprah looks sometimes on her magazine covers, she must have 50,000 body parts somedays.
So, why are you here if you don't care about OJ??? Oh, that's right, to sell your video. I forgot.I don't give a damn about whether OJ was innocent or not, if I was given the same assignment and found the evidence to find him guilty, I would gladly push the deep fry button on him, myself.
Sounds familiar... Is that where you get it from?Well, you're probably right, given the pulse of America. The tactic is not new though, this nation's unscrupulous actors in high places have had a history of imflaming the passions of the body politique for their own pecuniary interests.