Discussion in 'Streetwear and Denim' started by Fuuma, Nov 14, 2010.
I feel like I could say "ORLY?" in response to so many of your posts, London.
yeah he chump
It's a great coat, price is the only thing that puts me off.
what do you mean. The brands are developed for totally different audiences. Why even compare the two.
Yo Ari. you're a chump
Yeah, It's also the reason why I have not bought it yet. Endclothing have 20% off (72 hours code).
But I dont know if the smallest size/48 would be a little too big for me. I'm already got some Nigel Jackets in size 48, but I heard the Scott’s expedition are big in sizes (more than the normally NC)?
Im approx. 172 cm and 77 kg. and I also going to loose som weight at the moment ,so it may not be too big/loose from the start.
Enter the code ‘CHAMPAGNE’ at the checkout for 20% off your order at End Clothing - offer ends at midnight (GMT)
Not that anyone cares, but limited edition, military green version of Geddes is the Moss green version that was available at Marrkt. Just got that confirmed.
Did someone see the AW12 winter surface jacket?
It's a stunning piece made from heavy oilcloth.
Theres's a King George on ebay if anyone is interested. Size 50. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Nigel-Cab...pt=UK_Men_s_Coats_Jackets&hash=item35c181f512
Also seen this which is really misleading http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Nigel-Cab...pt=UK_Men_s_Coats_Jackets&hash=item3ccc6b3a2c
The bottom two buttons are way off in that jacket (LN-CC photo). Wow!
LOL.. 'Identical in many ways' indeed..
The NC Utility Everest parkas pop up on Ebay fairly often. Not sure how it's misleading if he says "Please don't confuse this Parker with the Nigel Cabourn Orange Parker costing around £2,000."
It's just not sitting in the end of the buttonhole. A little tug, and it will line up with the others.
But you're right. There are three colours. Besides the navy and the beige there's also olive.
And there seems to be a purple, too.
I don't think I agree with you here. I think it's pretty dodgy to be using pictures of a completely different product to what you are selling. From what I remember he doesn't even mention that the first few pictures are a different product only that they are taken from the internet. I agree that he's trying to cover his back with the above statement but it's not the whole truth about what he's presenting (i.e. pictures from a different product). We all know that most people are idiots and will only look at the first few pictures and skim the text when looking at things on the internet (which of course is their problem).
Separate names with a comma.