Lord-Barrington
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2010
- Messages
- 2,801
- Reaction score
- 98
I don't disagree with this. I think it's a trade that could just as easily look quite good of quite bad in a few seasons time. I am cautiously optimistic just because I've always liked Kaberle's skillset and I think he will fit in well in Montreal (Toronto and MTL being very similar markets and cities) and believe that his problems with Boston and Carolina stemmed from not really wanting to play with either team (despite the fact that he accepted to go to both teams).
I think if he hits a 45pt stride and doesn't turn the puck over as much as he did with the Bruins, Habs fans will be happy. But that isn't close to guaranteed.
O snap.
Player for player it's a good deal. Kaberle is better than Spacek even if he's not terribly motivated. The problem is the cap hit. Basically, if he continues to coast, and can't approach his Toronto production, he is an albatross. As a Canuck fan I compare it to the David Booth trade, but with greater risk for Montreal while giving up less than Gillis did. There is no way to say "bad trade" on it except a couple of years out in hindsight.
I don't disagree with this. I think it's a trade that could just as easily look quite good of quite bad in a few seasons time. I am cautiously optimistic just because I've always liked Kaberle's skillset and I think he will fit in well in Montreal (Toronto and MTL being very similar markets and cities) and believe that his problems with Boston and Carolina stemmed from not really wanting to play with either team (despite the fact that he accepted to go to both teams).
I think if he hits a 45pt stride and doesn't turn the puck over as much as he did with the Bruins, Habs fans will be happy. But that isn't close to guaranteed.