1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

New york times article is on line

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by Bic Pentameter, Sep 27, 2004.

  1. Mike C.

    Mike C. Senior member

    Messages:
    1,528
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2002
    Location:
    New York City
    We seem to be getting a bit more traffic. Nothing too crazy, but who knows, it could increase. The overall numbers are still low in comparison to a lot of other forums which have visitors in the thousands per day. I feel good about this whole thing. Perhaps we will start seeing better dressed people everyday.
     
  2. Steve B.

    Steve B. Senior member

    Messages:
    10,272
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Location:
    San Antonio
    Thanks for the good wishes guys. Plastic is on clothes cuz my kids have cats that like to hide in my closet. [​IMG] Hat is from Optimo in Chicago. Anyone want contact info?
     
  3. AskAndyAboutClothes

    AskAndyAboutClothes Senior member

    Messages:
    175
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2003
    Location:
    Manhattan Beach & Palm Desert, CA
    Steve: Not just the plastic, but wire hangers.. "No wire hangers..." -- Faye Dunaway as Joan Crawford in the 1981 movie "Mommie Dearest". And re our photos: Â compare our tie knot dimples.. Â Not to mention that we're both standing (jacket should be fastened) and inside (wearing a hat?). Â [​IMG] As long as we're having fun.. Great story. Â Leonard looks marvelous. Â [​IMG] Andy
     
  4. Steve B.

    Steve B. Senior member

    Messages:
    10,272
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Location:
    San Antonio
    Dude: You're "bagging" on me [​IMG] It was a goof picture, K? Besides you told them socks should match trousers which is ALL wrong. [​IMG]
     
  5. tsloop

    tsloop Senior member

    Messages:
    245
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Location:
    Monterey, CA
    I thought the article wasnt bad, now if only they would print it in a paper where I live maybe more people would dress in at least respectable clothes. Then I wouldnt have to worry about always sticking out because I am actually dressed decently while everyone else is in a polo and some baggy dockers at the best.
     
  6. Leo Jay

    Leo Jay Senior member

    Messages:
    212
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    New Member here, thanks to the New York Times. I'm looking forward to getting some valuable information here.

    For what it's worth, as an outsider, the article didn't at all leave me with the impression of this site being a 'bargain hunter's haven' or anything like that. It rather left an impression of a group of people fiercely dedicated to exploring the finer points of men's fashion.
     
  7. jerrysfriend

    jerrysfriend Senior member

    Messages:
    242
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Location:
    Atlanta, Ga
    "Fashion" is a dirty word to many of us here; a term best suited to the way the fairer sex tries to dress, i.e., "in the latest fashion". I think most us prefer "style." That is why some of have 20 year-old shoes English shoes that we keep getting refurbished. Heck, at that age they are just getting broken in and are starting to conform to our feet. Right, guys?
     
  8. kidkim2

    kidkim2 Senior member

    Messages:
    304
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Location:
    Burlingame, CA
    Ken--

    Try "thirty-five-year-old shoes" and you'd be closer to the truth.

    But Leo Jay's "fiercely dedicated" is right on the money.

    Welcome.
     
  9. christian

    christian Senior member

    Messages:
    229
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Actually, that sounds pretty sexist when it claims that women are somehow less interested in the construction than men. There are probably a few hundred active members here; most people probably only posted a few times. That doesn't make us representative of most men. It just reinforces the sterotypes that women are more superficial, and why they shouldn't do certain jobs.

    After all, I'm sure there most be some forums similar to this for women. At the very least, they would be talking bout sewing patterns and such.
     
  10. faustian bargain

    faustian bargain Senior member

    Messages:
    2,523
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Location:
    Bay Area
    the claim about women may or may not be true. the point was to contrast the attitude here on styleforum with that of a more superficial aesthetic, which some presume to be the primary mode of women.

    the fashion vs style argument (especially vis-a-vis the sexes) probably belongs on another thread.

    you'll find people in various camps here with regard to the 'style' vs. 'fashion' nomenclature and attitude.

    ***edit: and the topic of whether there is a similar forum for women's clothing has been brought up, and the only answer i've seen is that, indeed, the women's sites tend to focus on fashion trends as opposed to construction, less temporal rules of style, etc.
     
  11. JohnG

    JohnG Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    51
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Manolas are legendary from "Sex in the City"


    Does that mean perhaps "Style in the City" starring Steve and Andy

      or maybe-

    "Dressing the apple " with Steve and Andy?

    <warm smile>

    Congrats Gentlemen.

    Respectfully,
     John

    I wanna be a queststar or your pet or something on the show
     
  12. Leo Jay

    Leo Jay Senior member

    Messages:
    212
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    I was going to make the point in my original post that with the exception of a few very high end traditional designers, the womenswear industry on the whole tends to be more concerned with 'fashion' than construction.  I don't believe that that assertion necessarily reflects a "sexist" assumption that women are more "superficial" -- I think it just speaks to the practicalities of the way women tend to wear their clothing: why build something to last for 20 years when it's going to be worn for a single season before being sent to the thrift shop?  

    To be sure, much of men's 'fashion' is similarly disposable, but at least on the high end of suits, shirts and shoes, these items are generally considered to be wearable for many a year, so they tend to be constructed accordingly.
     
  13. LA Guy

    LA Guy Opposite Santa Staff Member Admin Moderator

    Messages:
    33,419
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2002
    Location:
    Moscow, Idaho
    I've met many, many women interested in fashion, and significantly fewer men. Excepting actual professionals, and then usually professionals involved in the creative side of the industry (designers and buyers, for example), I've never met a fashionista with the depth and breadth of knowledge of the men.
     
  14. jerrysfriend

    jerrysfriend Senior member

    Messages:
    242
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Location:
    Atlanta, Ga
    I don't know about being more "superficial." It is just a different way of thinking about things. Why are so many more women for Kerry, than men, for example?
    There was a prior post about women wanting "really in" and "cute," with respect to clothes and the handful of us nuts who post here being perfectionists. It implied that many of us would be happier wearing Dad's old, but refurbished, Savile Row sportcoat, than the latest "item" from Prada, Versace or Gucci.
     
  15. Bradford

    Bradford Senior member

    Messages:
    6,708
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2002
    Location:
    Phoenix
    Welcome aboard Leo -

    I agree with your point about women's fashion being designed for a shorter period of time, although there are certain classic designers whose work does seem to last longer (i.e. Chanel suits).

    I'm in the category that prefers the term "style" over "fashion" because I believe that style lasts while fashions change.

    Anyhow - hope you enjoy the forum and a hearty welcome to you and all other NYT readers.

    Bradford
     
  16. FIHTies

    FIHTies Senior member Affiliate Vendor

    Messages:
    2,959
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Location:
    Back and Better Than Before
    Correct me if I am wrong J, but 75 new members in the last 24 hours...
     
  17. j

    j Senior member Admin

    Messages:
    14,914
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2002
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I believe you are correct there, and there are another 77 or so in the pipeline of 'applied but awaiting authorization'. Some of those will not finish auth, some put a fake email and re-applied using a real one, etc.- that's usually the way those work. If I wanted to feel extra cool I could approve them all manually and have 150-some new members, but most would never actually show up.

    So far, I'm impressed with the relative lack of trolls in the new ranks. Thanks for quality exposure, Ginia & the NYT.
     
  18. esquire.

    esquire. Senior member

    Messages:
    1,303
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    The thing that irked about the description of how we were all professionals irked me because it just seemed unnecessairly elitist. It just seems that any new influx, any new blood, would be like the people she described- professionals, consultants, lawyers, etc...

    There's nothing wrong with being a lawyer, but it would be great if we could get a more diverse membership, and that we all also discuss casual wear as well. We all talk about how this forum can help the greater public, but people aren't having problems dressing up in a suit. That's a pretty safe uniform. Its when people try to dress without wearing a suit that you get all those disasters on the street.
     
  19. Nick M

    Nick M Senior member

    Messages:
    1,491
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2002
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Can someone scan the article, for those without a physical copy? Online, everyone looks like Steve B. and Larry Kudlow... Â [​IMG]
     
  20. Bradford

    Bradford Senior member

    Messages:
    6,708
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2002
    Location:
    Phoenix
    Hey - there is a post dedicated to this topic on the Men's Health Style Board. Seems they are upset that they weren't mentioned in the article. Not to be a snob, but if the article had mentioned them, wouldn't it have to say, "another online forum commonly deals with questions such as 'dude, what faux-vintage t-shirt goes best with my new ripped Abercrombie jeans' and also includes approximately 137 posts on shaving your genitals and other body parts." Â [​IMG] Bradford
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by