• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

New 'top drawer' Church's range?

countbaron

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
225
Reaction score
5
Today I walked into one the Church's shops in central London and they had a few models priced at something like £660 with a new last. One of them was called Lamont I believe, but I may have misread. The SA said they were part of a new collection which she called 'haute de gamme'. She was French so I am unsure if this is the "˜official' name.

It is a huge jump from the previous top priced £485 range that were associated with the Royal collection, i.e.,. Tewkesbury, Tenby, Taunton, Walcot , etc (I confess to having them all- bought at half-price; no seconds)

They looked pretty nice, but not obviously £200 nicer. The last is sleeker and there is more 'attention' to the waist- but don't get me wrong it is still far from the pornographic soles of the likes of AS and G&G.

Anyway, does anyone know anything about this 'new collection'??
 

Leather man

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
299
Reaction score
7
Originally Posted by countbaron
Today I walked into one the Church's shops in central London and they had a few models priced at something like £660 with a new last. One of them was called Lamont I believe, but I may have misread. The SA said they were part of a new collection which she called 'haute de gamme'. She was French so I am unsure if this is the "˜official' name.

It is a huge jump from the previous top priced £485 range that were associated with the Royal collection, i.e.,. Tewkesbury, Tenby, Taunton, Walcot , etc (I confess to having them all- bought at half-price; no seconds)

They looked pretty nice, but not obviously £200 nicer. The last is sleeker and there is more 'attention' to the waist- but don't get me wrong it is still far from the pornographic soles of the likes of AS and G&G.

Anyway, does anyone know anything about this 'new collection'??


There's another thread about this called " Church's new 137 last" I am the only one who has replied and it was started on 24th May - so I guess the absolute lack of interest is due to SF group think on Church's. I'd love to know more about this range.
 

kev777

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
1,458
Reaction score
76
Originally Posted by Leather man
There's another thread about this called " Church's new 137 last" I am the only one who has replied and it was started on 24th May - so I guess the absolute lack of interest is due to SF group think on Church's. I'd love to know more about this range.

Nope me too, any insider info ?????????????????
 

VelvetGreen

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
696
Reaction score
33
I'd like to know. I'm a Church's fan.
 

LS7

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2009
Messages
2,382
Reaction score
68
I posted about this in a new thread a couple of weeks ago: http://www.styleforum.net/showthread.php?t=245521. My observations were similar to the OP, in that the 137 last they are using for this new range is sleeker than one normally associates with Church's. I will pop into the Canary Wharf store tomorrow and ask to take some pics.
 

alliswell

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
3,954
Reaction score
18
Originally Posted by Achilles_
Why would SF not like Church's?

They're not discussed too often here as their sales presence in the US is pretty limited. From what I've seen at Leffot they make a good solid shoe.
 

LS7

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2009
Messages
2,382
Reaction score
68
Originally Posted by Achilles_
Why would SF not like Church's?

Lasts not as "exciting" as, for example, EG 888 or JL 7000, plus the non-channeled sole. There have also been threads where the quality of the leather has been called into question, however I'm no expert so I'll leave it for others to comment.
 

countbaron

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
225
Reaction score
5
I think that not many people here (or anywhere) could really say if this leather is that much better than that leather just by looking/felling it when we are talking about high grade shoes.

I surely am not in that position, but the leather used in the £485 Church's range (betis) is as buttery as they come

I am partial to Church's to good extent because how easy it is to get good deals in the UK, and I assume the opposite is true for posters living in countries where that is not the case, which I can only guess includes the US and we know that SF is US-heavy. That would to some extent justify Church’s bad rep in SF.

Other than price/quality ratio the other complains commonly are: ‘it is owned by prada’, and the lasts, colouring are boring

I don’t think the 1st issue is pertinent, but I agree that C&J have a nicer variety than Church’s. However, many benchgrade C&J’s are significantly more fragile than Custom Grade church’s

Anyway, what about this new 137 ‘beasts’ ??
 

Jermyn

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2011
Messages
172
Reaction score
39
I was wondering about this the other day.

I saw a shoe that looked like it was made from museum/ radica calf in Church's on Bond Street. I'm guessing this must be the same range you're all talking about. I'd never seen Church's use such interesting leathers before.

I only work around the corner so I'll pop in tomorrow and ask about them.

I think American SFers don't like Church's because they don't have access to their custom grades at £160 like we do. My Bicester beauties are holding up wonderfully, especially considering that they are my go to shoe whenever it rains.

I've been polishing a pair of brown Nevada Calf Waltons with red polish for the last 6 months and they're already starting to develop a great character. The leather is very supple and easy to maintain. Last-wise they are certainly a lot sleeker than most Aldens (which also do not have concealed channel soles)
stirpot.gif


My one gripe is that the sole overshoots the upper, giving what I refer to as a 'squiddy' appearance. My next order of business will be to see if I can get John Rushton to put some Baker soles on them, cut more closely to the uppers.
 

TRINI

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
9,006
Reaction score
658
SF'ers don't like Church's because they're under the impression that Prada's ownership of the company has somehow comprised the quality of the shoes.
 

Jangofett

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
618
Reaction score
12
Originally Posted by Jermyn
I've been polishing a pair of brown Nevada Calf Waltons with red polish for the last 6 months and they're already starting to develop a great character. The leather is very supple and easy to maintain. Last-wise they are certainly a lot sleeker than most Aldens (which also do not have concealed channel soles)
stirpot.gif


Do you use red shoe polish or red shoe cream?
I have been using blue shoe polish and shoe cream on my black shoes but they still look as black as ever.
 

Achilles_

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2010
Messages
3,319
Reaction score
52
Originally Posted by TRINI
SF'ers don't like Church's because they're under the impression that Prada's ownership of the company has somehow comprised the quality of the shoes.

Did the original Church's owners buy Cheaney or something?
 

luk-cha

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
4,530
Reaction score
83
Originally Posted by Achilles_
Did the original Church's owners buy Cheaney or something?

yes!
 

fritzl

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
12,266
Reaction score
268
Originally Posted by countbaron
I think that not many people here (or anywhere) could really say if this leather is that much better than that leather just by looking/felling it when we are talking about high grade shoes.

exactly. it takes a lot of experience and knowledge, which i don't have either atm. look and feel can be a factor, but you can fail immensly.

Originally Posted by countbaron
...which I can only guess includes the US and we know that SF is US-heavy. That would to some extent justify Church's bad rep in SF.

Other than price/quality ratio the other complains commonly are: "˜it is owned by prada', and the lasts, colouring are boring


basic knowledge about shoes is pretty low here. drum beating can be effective, though.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 55 35.5%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 60 38.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 17 11.0%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 27 17.4%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 28 18.1%

Forum statistics

Threads
505,178
Messages
10,579,201
Members
223,893
Latest member
Fitspressoaustrali
Top