• STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

New JJ Abrams TV show "Fringe"

denning

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
1,292
Reaction score
168
I anyone else anticipating this? Or has anyone else even heard about it?
I just watched the 2 hour pilot. Apparently it was shot with a budget of $10 million, and is better than most movies out there, despite this being a tv show.

Apparantly it's JJ Abrams' new take on a Twilight Zone, X-Files type show. "Fringe" refers to fringe science. One of the main characters is a mad scientist (Dr. Frankenstein crossed with Einstein) who was locked up in a mental facility for 17 years. Before an assistant got killed and he got locked up for manslaughter, he was part of a government program in which he experimented in fringe science (ie. mind control, teleportation, invisibility, reanimation). Unexplained events begin to occur in the world and the FBI needs him to help.

I quite enjoyed it, but then I have to admit that I've always enjoyed JJ Abrams' tv shows. Guilty pleasures one might say. The lead woman is uber hot, and the mad scientist has some great lines.

"They, they have this horrible pudding in here. Butterscotch pudding on Mondays. It's, it's dreadful."
"It's Thursday."
"Oh! Well that's fantastic news."

"The only thing better than a cow is a human...Unless you need milk...Then you really need a cow."
 

Neo_Version 7

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
19,664
Reaction score
4,643
Is it Lost-esque?
 

denning

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
1,292
Reaction score
168
There seems to be an overarching mythology or large scale story behind the series (ie. who is causing these horrific events that they are now investigating) but each episode will be based around a new issue (kind of like X-Files with an overarching storyline, but discrete episodes). So, yes, somewhat Lost-esque.
 

jschenkkan

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by denning
I anyone else anticipating this? Or has anyone else even heard about it?
I just watched the 2 hour pilot. Apparently it was shot with a budget of $10 million, and is better than most movies out there, despite this being a tv show.

Apparantly it's JJ Abrams' new take on a Twilight Zone, X-Files type show. "Fringe" refers to fringe science. One of the main characters is a mad scientist (Dr. Frankenstein crossed with Einstein) who was locked up in a mental facility for 17 years. Before an assistant got killed and he got locked up for manslaughter, he was part of a government program in which he experimented in fringe science (ie. mind control, teleportation, invisibility, reanimation). Unexplained events begin to occur in the world and the FBI needs him to help.

I quite enjoyed it, but then I have to admit that I've always enjoyed JJ Abrams' tv shows. Guilty pleasures one might say. The lead woman is uber hot, and the mad scientist has some great lines.

"They, they have this horrible pudding in here. Butterscotch pudding on Mondays. It's, it's dreadful."
"It's Thursday."
"Oh! Well that's fantastic news."

"The only thing better than a cow is a human...Unless you need milk...Then you really need a cow."


Did you get a preview of it? I checked on fox's website and I couldn't find it. It is fox, isnt it?
 

denning

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
1,292
Reaction score
168
Originally Posted by jschenkkan
Did you get a preview of it? I checked on fox's website and I couldn't find it. It is fox, isnt it?

Shhh... Don't tell anyone, but I used bittorrent.
 

Neo_Version 7

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
19,664
Reaction score
4,643
Watched the pilot and it wasn't too bad. Abrams production through and through but I hope it picks up after a few episodes. I mean that ending was just too effing cheesy.
 

von Rothbart

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
2,461
Reaction score
14
Love the pilot, I am glad that as Lost is winding down Fringer emerges. It's funny how both pilots started with a midair disaster. The three main characters have great chemistry, I especially like the comic reliefs provided by the sarcastic Jackson's character. The CEO of the giant GE-Microsoftesque corporation is like a creepy version of Meg Whitman. I am hoping subsequent episodes will live up to its premise.
 

esquire.

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
Messages
1,303
Reaction score
2
Originally Posted by denning
I just watched the 2 hour pilot. Apparently it was shot with a budget of $10 million, and is better than most movies out there, despite this being a tv show.

I quite enjoyed it, but then I have to admit that I've always enjoyed JJ Abrams' tv shows. Guilty pleasures one might say.


JJ Abrams' shows almost always start off strong, especially in the first few episodes, but then end up sucking when its clear that Abrams has no idea what to do beyond an intriguing start. After season 1, Lost was just a freakin' hot mess. I don't care what the producers said, I still think they had no idea where they were going with that story.

I suspect that Abrams would probably do better if he was limited to a miniseries or just one season than trying to create a multi-season TV series.
 

Neo_Version 7

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
19,664
Reaction score
4,643
Originally Posted by esquire.
JJ Abrams' shows almost always start off strong, especially in the first few episodes, but then end up sucking when its clear that Abrams has no idea what to do beyond an intriguing start. After season 1, Lost was just a freakin' hot mess. I don't care what the producers said, I still think they had no idea where they were going with that story.

I suspect that Abrams would probably do better if he was limited to a miniseries or just one season than trying to create a multi-season TV series.


I know where you're coming from. Lost Season 2 was seriously a departure from the near-perfect Season 1. However, I have to say they really got their shit together in the recent seasons.

As for Fringe, I stand by my opinion that it was a flawed but still an enjoyable pilot.
Oh and how cool are those 3-D letters?
 

horndog

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
1,031
Reaction score
220
I watched this last night and thought it was pretty good. A little over-the-top at points, with forced comic relief moments from the Dawson's Creek / Mighty Ducks dude, but it looks promising. I fear though that it'll be a continuous c*cktease ala Lost, where new ideas are perpetually introduced and none explained. So we'll see where it goes. The X-Files fan in me will keep me coming back for a while.
 

Jenaimarr

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
242
Reaction score
3
I thought it started off strong, lost momentum in the middle, and ended in a craptastic fashion. It's like they decided to throw a curveball for the sake of throwing a curveball. I'll probably still keep watching the rest of the season but with lowered expectations.

It's probably the research scientist in me, but I seriously thought that their "scientific" explanations with magnesium gluconante, blah blah blah was the worst example of tv science I've ever come across on screen. It's like they just looked at a lab shelf and picked out the longest sounding chemicals to lend pseduocredibility to the "chemical reaction" that caused Agent Scott to turn translucent.

Calcium? nah too short.
Sodium? nah too common.
Potassium? hmm... possible.
Magnesium? BINGO! That shit sounds like it can cure the translucentness!



anyone else think Joshua Jackson was essentially just playing Pacey Witter again?
 

lefty

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Oct 27, 2006
Messages
10,306
Reaction score
2,803
Originally Posted by Jenaimarr
I thought it started off strong, lost momentum in the middle, and ended in a craptastic fashion. It's like they decided to throw a curveball for the sake of throwing a curveball. I'll probably still keep watching the rest of the season but with lowered expectations.

It's probably the research scientist in me, but I seriously thought that their "scientific" explanations with magnesium gluconante, blah blah blah was the worst example of tv science I've ever come across on screen. It's like they just looked at a lab shelf and picked out the longest sounding chemicals to lend pseduocredibility to the "chemical reaction" that caused Agent Scott to turn translucent.

Calcium? nah too short.
Sodium? nah too common.
Potassium? hmm... possible.
Magnesium? BINGO! That shit sounds like it can cure the translucentness!



anyone else think Joshua Jackson was essentially just playing Pacey Witter again?


Agree.

Fairly weak pilot (even Abrams admits as much), tepid plotting and awkward dialogue.

Pass.

lefty
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

Most Interesting Fashion Collaboration of 2020

  • JW Anderson x Uniqlo

  • Nigo x Virgil Abloh

  • Converse x Midnight Studios

  • Rick Owens x Champion

  • Barbour x Engineered Garments

  • Adidas x Bed JW Ford

  • Jordan Brand x Dior

  • Billie Eilish x Takashi Murakami

  • Lego x Levi's


Results are only viewable after voting.

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
446,540
Messages
9,657,903
Members
201,810
Latest member
dogjaeja
Top