1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

NBA 2016-2017 Season Thread

Discussion in 'Entertainment, Culture, and Sports' started by RFX45, Sep 22, 2010.

  1. HRoi

    HRoi Senior member

    Messages:
    17,796
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Brandon Knight went to HS around here. Seemed to be a good kid. Seeing Jimmer in person, I think he can play in the NBA as long as no one expects him to play defense.

    Player to build a franchise around today? Kevin Durant.
     
  2. ConcernedParent

    ConcernedParent Senior member

    Messages:
    4,234
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Location:
    West Coast is back for all you suckas
    Also I was reading the Washington Post earlier today and an article on LeBron James stated that two Western Conference GMs would still pick LeBron to build a franchise around even after his choke job in the finals. If you could pick any NBA player to build your franchise around who would it be?
    Lebron, no question. Rose next. Why the fuck would anybody choose Kobe at his age?
     
  3. NorCal

    NorCal Senior member

    Messages:
    8,419
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Howard, Rose, Durant.
     
  4. bob_gnarly

    bob_gnarly Senior member

    Messages:
    922
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2008
    I would want a healthy Chris Paul to build a team around
     
  5. jet

    jet Senior member

    Messages:
    20,966
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2006
    Location:
    socal
    Kobe, just to join this pointless discussion.
     
  6. Cordwinder

    Cordwinder Senior member

    Messages:
    487
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Location:
    Japan
    How long will Mike Brown last as Lakers coach?

    1. Till contract expires
    2. 1st full season and quits because burnt out
    3. Kobe led mutiny in the locker room get Mike Brown fired before ASG, and Shaw takes rightful position coach.
     
  7. Mr. Moo

    Mr. Moo Senior member

    Messages:
    17,229
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Location:
    Bay Area, CA
    Kobe, just to join this pointless discussion.
    You would pick Kobe to build a team around right now? 1300+ games/multiple knee surgeries/can't turn it on anymore whenever he wants/approaching mid 30's Kobe?
     
  8. StephenHero

    StephenHero Senior member

    Messages:
    14,187
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    I'd go with 1) Durant 2) Lebron 3) Rose 4) Howard 5) Griffin
     
  9. edinatlanta

    edinatlanta Senior member

    Messages:
    25,427
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2008
    Location:
    Wit' Yo' Baby Momma
    Thabeet.

    I think jet's rule should be if you can't recognize an iso as it happens, stay out of the thread.
     
  10. LawrenceMD

    LawrenceMD Senior member

    Messages:
    7,400
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Luke Walton, just to join this pointless discussion.

    [​IMG]
     
  11. munchausen

    munchausen Senior member

    Messages:
    8,189
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Give me Durant, a veteran point guard and a couple of journeyman bigs and I will give you a team to beat.
     
  12. LawrenceMD

    LawrenceMD Senior member

    Messages:
    7,400
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Give me Durant, a veteran point guard and a couple of journeyman bigs and I will give you a team to beat.

    Trade westbrook for nash!

    seriously though how about this trade:

    okc: russell westbrook, Kendrick perkins, nate robinson
    ORL: Dwight Howard

    it works in the NBA trade machine. you make Maynor a non-ballhog PG who will pass to howard or durrant. orlando gets westbrook and perkins, (both with great contracts) and nate robinson as a throw in who you can the contract go after 2012. Both teams are far far away from each other so there's no backlash trading to a division rival.
     
  13. fairholme_wannabe

    fairholme_wannabe Senior member

    Messages:
    334
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Trade westbrook for nash!

    seriously though how about this trade:

    okc: russell westbrook, Kendrick perkins, nate robinson
    ORL: Dwight Howard

    it works in the NBA trade machine. you make Maynor a non-ballhog PG who will pass to howard or durrant. orlando gets westbrook and perkins, (both with great contracts) and nate robinson as a throw in who you can the contract go after 2012. Both teams are far far away from each other so there's no backlash trading to a division rival.


    Doubt Orlando would do that, as they'd surely get a better deal from LA or NY (Amare?), or squeeze an extra asset out of OKC.

    It does seem like a Presti trade though--consolidating assets without taking discounts on the aggregate value of what he's giving up. More importantly, OKC would get to keep Ibaka and Harden. Defensively, that team would be ridiculous. Trick would be extending Harden and Ibaka long term with a D12 and KD max--but they'll have that challenge with a Westbrook and KD pair regardless.
     
  14. RFX45

    RFX45 Senior member

    Messages:
    16,318
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    That trade won't happen, Magic has too many PG's if that trade were to happen. Nelso, Arenas, Duhon plus they have a bunch of undersized guards in Reddick and Richardson (he's 6'6" but looks short [​IMG] ). So adding Westbrook & Nate Robinson isn't the best move.

    Plus I wouldn't start Maynor as a PG if Westbrook leaves, that job goes to Harden w/o hesitation.
     
  15. LawrenceMD

    LawrenceMD Senior member

    Messages:
    7,400
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    That trade won't happen, Magic has too many PG's if that trade were to happen. Nelso, Arenas, Duhon plus they have a bunch of undersized guards in Reddick and Richardson (he's 6'6" but looks short [​IMG] ). So adding Westbrook & Nate Robinson isn't the best move. Plus I wouldn't start Maynor as a PG if Westbrook leaves, that job goes to Harden w/o hesitation.
    Harden would become marbury/westbrook 2.0 [​IMG] why not just bite the bullet and realize that westbrook has the potential to become Dwyane Wade 2.0! both the same height, same athleticism, same scoring temperament, same ability to slash, ect. westbrook may need to be freed from his PG shackles and run and score as a 1st option. run nelson as the point and just let westbrook go to town scoring wise as a 2 guard. You still get perk to play defense/rebound and let this be an offensive juggernaut team...
    Doubt Orlando would do that, as they'd surely get a better deal from LA or NY (Amare?), or squeeze an extra asset out of OKC.
    bynum (+/- odom ), or amare are great trade chips, but they both still have huge red flags on their backs with potential season ending injuries always a scary possibility. I'd want something with less injury potential. If orlando ends up knowing that howard isn't resigning then they have to make a move right? That really sucks for them. Hopefully they get something great back and can still compete.
     
  16. RFX45

    RFX45 Senior member

    Messages:
    16,318
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Harden would become marbury/westbrook 2.0 [​IMG]

    I don't really see that, Harden runs the offense much better than Westbrook. He sees the court better than Westbrook but could also score at will at times. He isn't as good as Westbrook but as you said, Westbrook is more of a scorer than a true PG so I think overall Harden is much better in the starting line-up, also keep in mind that if he didn't get into foul trouble, they may have beaten Dallas at least one more game and pushed that series to Game 6. OKC lost a lot of offensive movement when Harden went to the bench.

    Plus Maynor is not as good and more of a Westbrook 2.0 than anything. I can't forget that one play in the last minute, dude held the ball for the whole shot clock and then waved off Westbrook, Durant and Harden to get out of his way, sloppily dribbles his way to the paint (which surprisingly he didn't turn the ball over) and shots a fade away jump shot that looks worst that Marions shot. I give him props for his confidence but fuck if you have one of the top 5 players in your team and one of the top 5 PGs in the year, I'd give it to them and let them score that rock.


    why not just bite the bullet and realize that westbrook has the potential to become Dwyane Wade 2.0! both the same height, same athleticism, same scoring temperament, same ability to slash, ect. westbrook may need to be freed from his PG shackles and run and score as a 1st option.

    run nelson as the point and just let westbrook go to town scoring wise as a 2 guard. You still get perk to play defense/rebound and let this be an offensive juggernaut team...


    True but I don't think he is on that level as DWade yet. Dudes been getting by because of Durant. Take out Durant in that OKC team and I'm not sure they'd make the playoffs as Westbrook as the 31 option. And that is exactly what he'll be in Orlando. His #2 option would be Nelson w/o any scoring presence in the paint?

    Perkins can be a pest in the paint but you can see that he need back-up like Garnett in Boston and Ibaka in OKC. You can see the weakness in his defense too, he can't guard someone who can shoot an outside shot well. Collison were the preferred defender in almost all the playoff series over him. Collison were guarding Randolph, Aldridge and Dirk for the most part. I wouldn't take Perkins in my team if he'll solely be my defensive strength in the paint.
     
  17. thinman

    thinman Senior member

    Messages:
    4,926
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Location:
    USA
    I don't really see that, Harden runs the offense much better than Westbrook. He sees the court better than Westbrook but could also score at will at times. He isn't as good as Westbrook but as you said, Westbrook is more of a scorer than a true PG so I think overall Harden is much better in the starting line-up, also keep in mind that if he didn't get into foul trouble, they may have beaten Dallas at least one more game and pushed that series to Game 6. OKC lost a lot of offensive movement when Harden went to the bench. Plus Maynor is not as good and more of a Westbrook 2.0 than anything. I can't forget that one play in the last minute, dude held the ball for the whole shot clock and then waved off Westbrook, Durant and Harden to get out of his way, sloppily dribbles his way to the paint (which surprisingly he didn't turn the ball over) and shots a fade away jump shot that looks worst that Marions shot. I give him props for his confidence but fuck if you have one of the top 5 players in your team and one of the top 5 PGs in the year, I'd give it to them and let them score that rock. True but I don't think he is on that level as DWade yet. Dudes been getting by because of Durant. Take out Durant in that OKC team and I'm not sure they'd make the playoffs as Westbrook as the 31 option. And that is exactly what he'll be in Orlando. His #2 option would be Nelson w/o any scoring presence in the paint? Perkins can be a pest in the paint but you can see that he need back-up like Garnett in Boston and Ibaka in OKC. You can see the weakness in his defense too, he can't guard someone who can shoot an outside shot well. Collison were the preferred defender in almost all the playoff series over him. Collison were guarding Randolph, Aldridge and Dirk for the most part. I wouldn't take Perkins in my team if he'll solely be my defensive strength in the paint.
    I think OKC stands pat and counts on player maturation to make them a better team. Westbrook can bring the ball upcourt, but they should run the offense through Harden as a "point forward" like Scottie Pippen (Harden is 6'7", with the bulk of a small forward so I don't think he can play PG). With some maturation, OKC could resemble the Bulls of the MJ era. Although no one can reasonably be compared with Jordan, Durant and Westbrook together give OKC as much as MJ and Steve Kerr together, after some major improvement Harden impersonates Pippen, and Ibaka and Perkins might contribute as much as Grant and Cartwright. OKC has a really young team that could get substantially better, given simply more experience. If I were their GM, I'd look to the draft and free agency to make small tweaks to the roster, maybe find a 3-point shooter, someone who can create his own shot, and/or a better power forward. I'm not talking about stars here, I'm talking about finding or developing very good role players like Jason Terry and Udonis Haslem.
     
  18. RFX45

    RFX45 Senior member

    Messages:
    16,318
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Westbrook can bring the ball upcourt, but they should run the offense through Harden as a "point forward" like Scottie Pippen (Harden is 6'7", with the bulk of a small forward so I don't think he can play PG).
    Hardens only 6'5" and Westbrook is only 6'3" but they seem to be just about the same height. [​IMG] Harden will get slaughtered as an SF especially if guarding someone like Lebron or Artest or Deng. Plus Durant plays SF and they can't move him to PF because he is just plain too scrawny.
     
  19. thinman

    thinman Senior member

    Messages:
    4,926
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Location:
    USA
    Hardens only 6'5" and Westbrook is only 6'3" but they seem to be just about the same height. Harden will get slaughtered as an SF especially if guarding someone like Lebron or Artest or Deng. Plus Durant plays SF and they can't move him to PF because he is just plain too scrawny.
    My bad. Harden is listed as a 6'5" guard, but IMO he's not quick enough to guard most NBA point guards. So put Harden at SG, Durant at SF, and leave Westbrook at PG to bring the ball upcourt, but let Harden initiate the offense.
     
  20. fairholme_wannabe

    fairholme_wannabe Senior member

    Messages:
    334
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008

    bynum (+/- odom ), or amare are great trade chips, but they both still have huge red flags on their backs with potential season ending injuries always a scary possibility. I'd want something with less injury potential.


    If orlando ends up knowing that howard isn't resigning then they have to make a move right? That really sucks for them. Hopefully they get something great back and can still compete.


    Sorry--should have detailed more. When I'm thinking of LA and NYK, I'm thinking of their additional ability to absorb one of the Magic's horrible contracts (Gilbert or Turk--take your pick) in addition to giving up assets. The large market teams have the ability to pay a luxury tax bill that would simply be prohibitive for OKC. I think that if/when ORL deals Dwight, they'll get assets in return, but they'll definitely be shedding a bad contract or two as well. That's why I think OKC won't be able to offer as much as the Lakers or Knicks.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by