• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

NBA 2016-2017 Season Thread

RFX45

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
16,599
Reaction score
6,258
No it is not, especially when you bring up the same thing every time and that is just to ***** because it is screwing up with your fantasy team.

If dude wasn't even in your team you wouldn't even know dude had a bad shooting night and not post about it.

Westbrook shot 3-19, 5-21, 8-23, 5-13 and 6-23 the last 5 games but you don't post about that.

Let me guess?

He isn't in your fantasy team so you have no idea of his stats and he isn't on the Lakers so you choose not **** on him?




And did you post when Kobe got a triple double and won against Denver? Or when he shot 50% against Indiana and practically won that game in the last second?

Nope, you did not because no way in hell you would post it if it praises Kobe in anyway or provide anything positive about the Lakers.

That is just you trolling by whining about his bad shooting night, which more often than not so it gets tiring seeing you waste bandwidth with your typical useless posts.
 
Last edited:

idfnl

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
17,305
Reaction score
1,260

No it is not, especially when you bring up the same thing every time and that is just to ***** because it is screwing up with your fantasy team.

If dude wasn't even in your team you wouldn't even know dude had a bad shooting night and not post about it.

Westbrook shot 3-19, 5-21, 8-23, 5-13 and 6-23 the last 5 games but you don't post about that.

Let me guess?

He isn't in your fantasy team so you have no idea of his stats and he isn't on the Lakers so you choose not **** on him?



Just like you, I take a topical interest in an NBA player in an NBA thread.
 

RFX45

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
16,599
Reaction score
6,258
Bullshit!


All you do is troll and take every chance you get to talk **** about Kobe or the Lakers. It isn't "topical". It is trolling.


Ban this idiot from this thread already Steve.
 
Last edited:

RFX45

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
16,599
Reaction score
6,258
Memphis trying to get Jeff Green or Luol Deng.
 

Steve B.

Go Spurs Go
Joined
Mar 2, 2002
Messages
10,286
Reaction score
134
I don't know how to ban a person from just a thread. I can give him a general time-out but I don't think what he said warrants this. I never gave Jet one even though he and I cross swords all the time.

When they were winning, several of you guys "trolled" because the Lakers were good.

I "troll" all the time about the Spurs, except lately because they've been having trouble winning games.

I do wish idfnl were less negative, but he has his First Amendment rights just like everyone else.
 

RFX45

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
16,599
Reaction score
6,258
But just to post Kobes bad shooting stats every time he does it when others have said to just move it to the Fantasy bball thread? It's not even just that one post but to continuously post the same thing over and over again, dude isn't contributing anything to the thread at all.

I mean it has no relevance at all other than to annoy, I think we all know this is his main purpose in this thread and that is by definition trolling, no?

We get it, Kobe is shooting bad but do we have to be reminded every game? Again dude is whining about it due to his fantasy team being affected, it isn't "topical" as he claims.


I never really felt like we "trolled" when the Lakers were winning, "LA Baby LA" didn't get posted every time they won and most of the time, it was a response to LA bashing to begin with (you know back then when idfnl himself complained with all the Lakers talk and tried to kick us out and create a Laker thread but when no one talked about the Lakers the thread was practically dead. Then when no one talks about the Lakers he brings it up in a negative way then it snowballs from there then he complains again about too much Laker talk in the thread?). LA BABY LA just gets posted these days because it's become a parody of itself and the Lakers rarely win these days that it is actually hilarious and a shock when it occurs.


I admit I am partially at fault for feeding him and playing along but damn there is actually good conversation/topic that is beyond his knowledge so he doesn't participate then he just comes up with more trolling.

It's barely January, that mean were going to have to put up with his **** of dreadful Kobe shooting for 4-5 more months?



And I am not even really asking to ban this fool just for bashing the Lakers but just for his whole none sense of a contribution and baiting and general trolling in this thread.
 
Last edited:

Hombre Secreto

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
6,136
Reaction score
3,253
God forbid anyone bashes Kobe, or the Lakers. Some of these fools are just as bad as the trolls on lakersground.
 

RFX45

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
16,599
Reaction score
6,258

God forbid anyone bashes Kobe, or the Lakers. Some of these fools are just as bad as the trolls on lakersground.


It's not even about that, yall act like we don't know they suck. Hell we play along and make fun of the Lakers too.

And first couple of times is funny but to just post every time every game, then that **** is just annoying.

Again if it bugs him because it affects his fantasy team, keep it in the fantasy thread.
 
Last edited:

jet

Persian Bro
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
22,391
Reaction score
11,133
there's nothing worse than an angeleno who's a laker hater aka hombre secreto in this case, tell me if you lived in another big city would you try to be cool by hating on that home team too? somehow I doubt it
 

RFX45

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
16,599
Reaction score
6,258
I guess the Hawks owners capitalizing on it's recent success, he just approved plans to sell the team.


How much you guys think it'll sell for? Should we pool our money now? StyleForum Hawks?

The Clippers, estimated by Forbes one year ago to be worth $575 million, sold for $2 billion last year. The bottom value for a franchise may have been set when the Milwaukee Bucks sold for about $550 million last year. Forbes valued the Hawks at $425 million before the sale of the Clippers and Bucks.
 

Neo_Version 7

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
17,292
Reaction score
4,323
c0Zk93v.jpg


Pictured: idnfl & RFX
 

NAMOR

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
20,430
Reaction score
3,488
I'll wager that they sell for more than bucks. The more pressing question and the one that must not be overlooked when screening potential owners is the hotness of owners daughter(s)
 
Last edited:

Steve B.

Go Spurs Go
Joined
Mar 2, 2002
Messages
10,286
Reaction score
134
RFX, chill man.

I will monitor the situation more closely at your request.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.4%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 87 38.3%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 35 15.4%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.9%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,456
Messages
10,589,485
Members
224,249
Latest member
Johnejmore
Top