National Hockey League 2012-2013 Thread

Discussion in 'Entertainment, Culture, and Sports' started by NewYorkIslander, Jul 1, 2012.

  1. rennavate

    rennavate Senior member

    Messages:
    1,466
    Likes Received:
    189
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    Location:
    Deadmonton
    Rob, those are some sick action shots! I was supposed to cover the Oilers game tonight, but the Oilers are being bitches about giving out more press passes this season. Lame! Oh well, I get to actually enjoy the game tonight instead of have to write about it.
     


  2. gomestar

    gomestar Super Yelper

    Messages:
    19,407
    Likes Received:
    3,871
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Location:
    NYC


  3. gort

    gort Senior member

    Messages:
    3,870
    Likes Received:
    453
    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2010
    

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2013


  4. jarude

    jarude Senior member

    Messages:
    4,767
    Likes Received:
    655
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Is it supposed to bait shooters into going glove side? Seems like it would be more work, but I use my glove to block more than anything so eh.

    Side note, I hate looking at new goalie equipment. Makes me so jelly... :( all of my shit is falling apart. Had my mask painted when I was a teenager and now I am really wishing I could go back and get something badass done; poor thing is all chipped to hell now.

    [​IMG]

    Bad shot, but you get the idea...
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2013


  5. Van Veen

    Van Veen Senior member

    Messages:
    3,754
    Likes Received:
    2,133
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2011
    Location:
    Nerdo Crombezia
    Theoretically it's a stupid place to put your glove since you're not actually blocking any part of the net from the puck's perspective, but from the shooter's perspective it makes it look like the top corner is covered, which is why some goalies raise the glove like that on breakaways.
     


  6. Van Veen

    Van Veen Senior member

    Messages:
    3,754
    Likes Received:
    2,133
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2011
    Location:
    Nerdo Crombezia
    

    The opposite. It's supposed to make it look like the top corner is covered.
     


  7. gort

    gort Senior member

    Messages:
    3,870
    Likes Received:
    453
    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2010
    He's requiring himself to do so much more work in order to make a save with his glove. I keep my glove down and facing out, far easier to swing your arm up than it is to snap it down.
     


  8. jarude

    jarude Senior member

    Messages:
    4,767
    Likes Received:
    655
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Now that I think of it, I can kind of see the rationale behind it... Holding the glove like that makes a catch more of a "wave" or rotation of the wrist to catch whereas conventional glove positioning would make it an extension of the arm which could be slower. Still looks stupid as hell though.


    Glove side != Top corner
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2013


  9. Van Veen

    Van Veen Senior member

    Messages:
    3,754
    Likes Received:
    2,133
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2011
    Location:
    Nerdo Crombezia
    Semantics. The point is to deter shooters from shooting high glove side.


    Exactly... but he's in the NHL and we're not...

    Trace a line between the puck location and the crossbar in this picture... his glove is completely above it.

    [​IMG]
     


  10. Van Veen

    Van Veen Senior member

    Messages:
    3,754
    Likes Received:
    2,133
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2011
    Location:
    Nerdo Crombezia
    Here's a stance shot of Lindback. Glove still a little high but not as egregious.

    [​IMG]
     


  11. jarude

    jarude Senior member

    Messages:
    4,767
    Likes Received:
    655
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    

    I don't know if I buy that... outside of the mythical allure of "top corner," its not a great spot to shoot for for the sake of shooting for. Unless a guy has an absolute fucking laserbeam from in close - and no, just because its the NHL, not everyone has a truly gifted shot - nobody's getting it in top corner. In which case, if a guy is in close and the goalie is blocking off the top corner ala Scrivens, the gargantuan-sized huge hole under the glove hand would be far more appealing to shoot for, hence the baiting. I'd be interested to know the percentage of goals scored per area of the net; I'd put all my money on lower half.

    In other words, I don't think there's any specific appeal to going top corner, especially from in close so I don't know why a goalie would want to pre-emptively suggest to the shooter that the area is off-limits.
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2013


  12. NewYorkIslander

    NewYorkIslander Affiliate Vendor

    Messages:
    9,936
    Likes Received:
    5,447
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Location:
    Breuckelen, NY 11209
    

    Its easier to get Ring Around the Rosie shooting top corner. I love me some ring around the rosie!
     


  13. jarude

    jarude Senior member

    Messages:
    4,767
    Likes Received:
    655
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Markov with a couple of huge blasts on the PP yesterday; that guy has a huge bomb of a shot it looks like. Nice to see Galchenyuk pot his first too.

    Anyone else think Detroit is finally going to start trending downwards? Will this be the first time they miss the playoffs in 22+ years?
     


  14. gomestar

    gomestar Super Yelper

    Messages:
    19,407
    Likes Received:
    3,871
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Location:
    NYC
    

    maybe. But I feel that if there's any slow-start team that can dial it up, Detroit might be the team. Granted, Lidstrom was a huge loss.
     


  15. jarude

    jarude Senior member

    Messages:
    4,767
    Likes Received:
    655
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    

    I know Babchuk can work voodoo wizard coaching magic like no one else, but literally the one constant through Detroit's history playoff streak was Lidstrom after his rookie season IIRC. Not saying he was the entire team, but their D is very slim now. Not a big fan of Howard either.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by