Juan for the road
Member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2008
- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello Gentlemen.I am heading down the path toward a new wardrobe.I am transitioning from outdoors in the field to an office environment in NYC in a field employing what I would consider much-younger-than-I hipsters. I am early 50s.I also predict I may move among different firms in the next few years before settling in my own firm. I believe traditional 3-piece would be a bit out of place and over the top in the environment.
As for my build,I am 6'2",195 lb athletic with large shoulders and narrow hips and waist... 44 chest ,34 waist. Fit has always been a chore,but when I hit it,it can be impressive.Today I was convinced this chore is worse than ever.Proved this in a rather unsatisfying 3 hour shopping session,also found that my choice in stores was a mistake within 10 minutes.
So first,let's talk pants.I had big ideas of walking out with 2 or 3 pairs of wool trousers and maybe a Chino or two. So I grabbed a half dozen 34s and went to work.Zanella, Hugo Boss,Saks 5th,Saks 5th Italy,a few others. Hit the dressing room,and knew before I got off the stool that most of them were just wrong.Main issues are not enough rise,I am hiking all of them up as I walk around,a 10 inch rise is nowhere close to over my hips,let alone my waist. Most of these are flat fronts,which I would prefer,but may not be practical for my pelvic makeup and apparently unfashionable high hip bones. And naturally the leg and thigh cuts are all over the place.
The other disappointing part,pants-wise,Is that anything that even approached fitting,displayed a ridiculous look in the side hips and pocket area. The pockets would not sit correctly and pants had a weird hip bump in the head-on view that my narrow waist and hips do not possess.Any ideas of looking good,switched to hopes of not looking comical.
I think one of the first trousers I tried,and set aside,I measured had an 11" rise.While walking around in these I remember thinking,"Not terrible,but another inch or two of rise is really needed", to even think about not hitching them up frequently.
So much more to talk about!
As for my build,I am 6'2",195 lb athletic with large shoulders and narrow hips and waist... 44 chest ,34 waist. Fit has always been a chore,but when I hit it,it can be impressive.Today I was convinced this chore is worse than ever.Proved this in a rather unsatisfying 3 hour shopping session,also found that my choice in stores was a mistake within 10 minutes.
So first,let's talk pants.I had big ideas of walking out with 2 or 3 pairs of wool trousers and maybe a Chino or two. So I grabbed a half dozen 34s and went to work.Zanella, Hugo Boss,Saks 5th,Saks 5th Italy,a few others. Hit the dressing room,and knew before I got off the stool that most of them were just wrong.Main issues are not enough rise,I am hiking all of them up as I walk around,a 10 inch rise is nowhere close to over my hips,let alone my waist. Most of these are flat fronts,which I would prefer,but may not be practical for my pelvic makeup and apparently unfashionable high hip bones. And naturally the leg and thigh cuts are all over the place.
The other disappointing part,pants-wise,Is that anything that even approached fitting,displayed a ridiculous look in the side hips and pocket area. The pockets would not sit correctly and pants had a weird hip bump in the head-on view that my narrow waist and hips do not possess.Any ideas of looking good,switched to hopes of not looking comical.
I think one of the first trousers I tried,and set aside,I measured had an 11" rise.While walking around in these I remember thinking,"Not terrible,but another inch or two of rise is really needed", to even think about not hitching them up frequently.
So much more to talk about!