• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Morning suit v lounge suit: BBC article

dasai

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
379
Reaction score
6
The Manton quote doesn't hurt things, either.
 

jrk264

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
It's interesting how something we now consider over-the-top formal evolved from what were pretty much practical working clothes. Kind of makes me wonder whether blue jeans and a t-shirt will ever turn into formal dress.

OTOH, the evolution seems to be going the other way--there's a bit in Dressing the Man where Flusser mentions that dress shirts used to be considered underwear. Imagine what will show up in the 2085 equivalent--"there was a time in your grandfather's day when boxer shorts were considered to be underwear, not fit for display in polite company..."
 

ShaneB

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2010
Messages
405
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by jrk264
It's interesting how something we now consider over-the-top formal evolved from what were pretty much practical working clothes. Kind of makes me wonder whether blue jeans and a t-shirt will ever turn into formal dress.

OTOH, the evolution seems to be going the other way--there's a bit in Dressing the Man where Flusser mentions that dress shirts used to be considered underwear. Imagine what will show up in the 2085 equivalent--"there was a time in your grandfather's day when boxer shorts were considered to be underwear, not fit for display in polite company..."


Jean and t-shirt? I doubt it because the two items look awful.

Morning coats, waistcoats and the like did derive from what could tentatively be called 'casual wear' or 'sportswear', but what facilitated its usurpation of more 'formal attire' (think Aristocratic breeches and court shoes, what we can now see as evening white tie dress) is that it looked good.

The Regency period is when tails and top-hats were the standard dress code and obviously that experienced a certain amount of transmutation going into the austere Victorian period - but remember, men were wearing lounge suits as standard attire right up until the 1950's (in England at least). It's degradation as standard attire is largely a story of its association with repressive and rather unwholesome values (David Cameron was reluctant to wear tails to the wedding because of its "˜negative associations'; various news stories told the tale of how tails was a relic of our "˜toffy-nosed past' - where did these associations come from? Why are they still so insidious even today?). It's actually a very complex topic; "˜ties' for example were considered by the haughty intellectuals of the Counter-Culture as symbolic of "˜slavery', hence the rebellion against it and its accompanied lounge suit in general. Ha! I blame everything on socialists but believe me, the story of why so many things that were considered the norm or considered convention, and how ultimately these things were relegated into the ether of negativity, is the story of the 1960's...
 

Archivist

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
688
Reaction score
34
HVAC Climate control systems have become very common, essentially ubiquitous in the industrialized world.
People like change.
Over the 20th Century, industries promoted change as a marketing tool.
Non-custom clothing has become extremely inexpensive and disposable.
The signifiers that the majority of people use in dress have changed drastically.
 

dragon8

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Messages
4,295
Reaction score
72
"No one looked better in tails than Fred Astaire, who was short, wispy, and not particularly handsome."

Wow, tell us what you really think of him.
 

Bounder

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Messages
2,364
Reaction score
547
Nicholas Antongiavanni, author of The Suit: A Machiavellian Approach to Men's Style and an article entitled Tailcoats: An Elegy. Kudos to Manton who is now, officially, an international expert. I wasn't aware of his tailcoat article. I will have to look it up.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 55 35.5%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 60 38.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 17 11.0%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 27 17.4%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 28 18.1%

Forum statistics

Threads
505,203
Messages
10,579,256
Members
223,890
Latest member
LucyKaven
Top