• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Modern Art and Decor

BDC2823

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
4,263
Reaction score
44
I don't get it. It looks like crap to me. Most modern art looks like somebody grabbed a canvas and a variety of paint and just threw the paint against the canvas. I can't draw or paint worth ****, but when I see this crap I think that I could do that. An Ikea catalogue is even worse. All the furniture is just so boring with no architectural style whatsoever. Take a square box and throw some square cushions on it and you have a sofa. Architecture just looks like someone went to the junkyard, grabbed some scrap metal, and welded it together. Am I missing something here? What is the appeal?
 

v0rtex

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
588
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by BDC2823
I don't get it. It looks like crap to me. Most modern art looks like somebody grabbed a canvas and a variety of paint and just threw the paint against the canvas. I can't draw or paint worth ****, but when I see this crap I think that I could do that. An Ikea catalogue is even worse. All the furniture is just so boring with no architectural style whatsoever. Take a square box and throw some square cushions on it and you have a sofa. Architecture just looks like someone went to the junkyard, grabbed some scrap metal, and welded it together. Am I missing something here? What is the appeal?

Modernism (which includes both the art and the furniture) is more conceptual than representational, where the ideas behind the object are as (or more) important than the actual object itself.

Modern furniture was, in the 50s/60s, a radical departure from everything that had come before. It completely discarded any traditional ornamentation and focussed on reducing objects to their essential forms. The Eames lounge chair is a perfectly designed machine for sitting in, you cannot take any part of it away without it ceasing to become functional as a chair.

Ikea designs are based on this philosophy, the lack of ornamentation being useful to them as it makes the furniture dirt-cheap to manufacture. This is the same problem with modern art - there's a billion crappy "Your photo on a pop-art canvas" pieces out there, but Warhol came up with the premise and was expressing his ideas about consumerism and the nature of art through his pieces. Anyone after that is just ripping off Warhol, which is not the same thing (although it may look like it on the surface).

Just like with more traditional art, where there's a million awful oil paintings of flowers for one Van Gogh, modern art is a huge body of crap with a few diamonds in it. Give it a few hundred years and there will only be a few major modern art pieces anyone remembers and all the rubbish will have been thrown away/burned/rotted away, just like with any other art movement in history.
 

hypersonic

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
850
Reaction score
3
Interesting post v0rtex,

I think we are currently living in a very peculiar period of art/design/culture. It seems like Modernism has become a caricature of itself -- a kind of postmodern interpretation of Modernism -- seen though the pluralistic [and cynical] eyes of post-industrial western civilization.

Actually, Modernism has really become a sad and very commercial decorating style more than an idea. Furniture companies like B&B Italia have made 'minimalism' fashionable ...even if it has little substance or real importance to high culture -- it is a kind of middle class "cafÃ
00a9.png
minimalism" ....very slick, very commercial ....very *Wallpaper -- for the tragically image-obsessed to live their empty lives in.

I am assuming the Modern Art BDC2823 is referring to is the kind of meaningless rubbish that 2nd-rate 'Jackson Pollock wannabes' try to pass off as interesting. Pollock's work is terrific and relevant to its time -- this abstract expressionism is not exactly cutting edge today -- in fact painting in general is not really at the forefront of the art world right now .....sculpture, multi-Media/video art, and photography are much more in tune with the current times.
 

johnapril

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
5,600
Reaction score
11
The best work is rarely discovered.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 55 35.5%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 60 38.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 17 11.0%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 27 17.4%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 28 18.1%

Forum statistics

Threads
505,162
Messages
10,579,096
Members
223,884
Latest member
mickspilloto
Top