Dismiss Notice

STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Minimalism, your thoughts

Discussion in 'Fine Living, Home, Design & Auto' started by itsstillmatt, Aug 1, 2007.

  1. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    I have nothing to say, and I am saying it.

    koji


    [​IMG]

    Jon.
     


  2. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    I like Bauhaus, both old and new:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Jon.
     


  3. Get Smart

    Get Smart Don't Crink

    Messages:
    12,158
    Likes Received:
    67
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2004
    Location:
    A town called Malice
    I like minimalist aesthetics, but not minimalist art. Although I do understand the progression that led to it, I find it's one of those art movements that had its relevance but now, if one were to be a minimalist artist, I would say that you're probably full of shit.

    It's like self-proclaiming you're a dada artist and putting up a garden trowel for display on a pedestal. These ideas had their time and place, and their effects are full felt, but to do it again doesnt have any artistic merit imo.

    All of the minimalist artists were trained artists who destructured their style into "minimalism" (Mondrian immediately comes to mind since he kept records of his own style's metamorphosis). When I was in art school there were way too many "minimalist" artists who couldnt really paint and it seemed like they used minimalism as a way to express their limitations in an "artistic" forum.

    In the end, what you see is what you get, and I don't care too much for the the end result of minimalism, even if the conceptual theory behind it is valid and interesting. Minimalist artists should have been writers.
     


  4. calvin1663

    calvin1663 Senior member

    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Location:
    anywhere in albion


  5. Ivan Kipling

    Ivan Kipling Senior member

    Messages:
    2,114
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Minimalist progression drove Christian Dior to introduce the chemise, during his final collection of couture clothes. The chemise, essentially a man's shirt extended below a woman's knees, was the exact opposite of Dior's introductory collection ironically remembered as 'the New Look.' Dior's first show emphasized deeply indented waists, padded busts and hips, and intricate dressmaking techniques.
    Although Chanel evolved during her career, she stuck stubbornly to her suit, pearls and camellias. It's that 'uniform' for women, always hemmed close to the knee, that maintains Chanel's status as THE inventive, classical couturiere.
     


  6. thepataphysician

    thepataphysician Senior member

    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    I like Donald Judd a lot, particularly the furniture. I also like John Pawson's architecture. I doubt I could ever cut enough out of my life to live in one of his houses, but there is something about those floor to ceiling doors, wide planks, and amazing clean staircases that I love.
     


  7. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    I like minimalist aesthetics, but not minimalist art. Although I do understand the progression that led to it, I find it's one of those art movements that had its relevance but now, if one were to be a minimalist artist, I would say that you're probably full of shit.

    It's like self-proclaiming you're a dada artist and putting up a garden trowel for display on a pedestal. These ideas had their time and place, and their effects are full felt, but to do it again doesnt have any artistic merit imo.

    All of the minimalist artists were trained artists who destructured their style into "minimalism" (Mondrian immediately comes to mind since he kept records of his own style's metamorphosis). When I was in art school there were way too many "minimalist" artists who couldnt really paint and it seemed like they used minimalism as a way to express their limitations in an "artistic" forum.

    In the end, what you see is what you get, and I don't care too much for the the end result of minimalism, even if the conceptual theory behind it is valid and interesting. Minimalist artists should have been writers.


    That was the basis of an art discussion I had with my cousin in Rome:

    Whereas Caravaggio had the skill to paint a Rothko, Rothko would have never been able to paint a Caravaggio. I think it's exactly as you say, the lack of skill is offset by defining oneself as a "˜minimalist'.

    Jon.
     


  8. Fuuma

    Fuuma Franchouillard Modasse

    Messages:
    25,990
    Likes Received:
    10,747
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    That was the basis of an art discussion I had with my cousin in Rome:

    Whereas Caravaggio had the skill to paint a Rothko, Rothko would have never been able to paint a Caravaggio. I think it's exactly as you say, the lack of skill is offset by defining oneself as a "˜minimalist'.

    Jon.


    We're talking about conceptual art here, Caravaggio would never have thought of painting a Rothko and I doubt his work would have had the same effect as Rothko's own, while Rothko could conceive and possibly paint (don't make the mistake of thinking avant-garde artists aren't talented classically trained painters) a Caravaggio (although, just like Caravaggio, his work would most probably be a pale copy of the original).
     


  9. Get Smart

    Get Smart Don't Crink

    Messages:
    12,158
    Likes Received:
    67
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2004
    Location:
    A town called Malice
    We're talking about conceptual art here,


    I don't have any problem with conceptual art when the artist is taking his work on a deconstructivist journey from "realism" to whatver end he reaches (as many of the original Minimalists did). My problem is with conceptual artists who start from minimalism and attempt to, but don't succeed, in taking it anyplace other than mimicing what's already been done. Esp when the artist employs a factory of workers to make his "art", a la Laddy Gill for example.

    I would place modern day minimalist artists in with interior/environmental design, rather than "fine art". But I realize the lines separating all of these niches gets more blurred together as time passes.
     


  10. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    We're talking about conceptual art here, Caravaggio would never have thought of painting a Rothko and I doubt his work would have had the same effect as Rothko's own, while Rothko could conceive and possibly paint (don't make the mistake of thinking avant-garde artists aren't talented classically trained painters) a Caravaggio (although, just like Caravaggio, his work would most probably be a pale copy of the original).

    I was talking about skill, not the actual creation of art itself. And, you are just assuming he has such a skill, there really is not proof, fro the complexity needed to paint a Caravaggio is simply not found in Rothko.

    Jon.
     


  11. dkzzzz

    dkzzzz Senior member

    Messages:
    5,360
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Location:
    Hoboken
    I believe there were some critics who maintained that the modernists and their minimalism were attempting to disengage the physical relationship a person has between the self and enviroment thus creating a disembodied experience.

    That consideration was also, apparently, the motivation behind Fascist esthetics, which bombastic it may have been, was predominantly Modern in its approach.


    S. Dali considered Hitler a surrealist artist of politics. Unfortunately there were not a hint of irony in his statement.
     


  12. lawyerdad

    lawyerdad Senior member

    Messages:
    22,594
    Likes Received:
    7,827
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    I was talking about skill, not the actual creation of art itself. And, you are just assuming he has such a skill, there really is not proof, fro the complexity needed to paint a Caravaggio is simply not found in Rothko.

    Jon.


    The fact that you're not aware of proof doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
     


  13. lawyerdad

    lawyerdad Senior member

    Messages:
    22,594
    Likes Received:
    7,827
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    S. Dali considered Hitler a surrealist artist of politics. Unfortunately there were not a hint of irony in his statement.

    Dali said very little that did not have a hint of irony, that included.
     


  14. lawyerdad

    lawyerdad Senior member

    Messages:
    22,594
    Likes Received:
    7,827
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Matt, of the four examples you posted I also prefer the Long. I have trouble giving a useful answer to questions like this. To refer back to the Pollock discussion, a good artistic work of pretty much any "school" has a presence and energy that are powerful. I find examples of this in many works that likely would be characterized as "minimalist". There's also a lot of mediocrity and schlock grouped under the same label. If asked whether I like Impressionism, I'd give the same answer. There are impressionist works of great beauty that are thrilling to experience in person. There are also impressionist, or wannabe impressionist, works that are horribly pallid and lifeless.
     


  15. Luc-Emmanuel

    Luc-Emmanuel Senior member

    Messages:
    1,586
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Location:
    Paris, France
    ImageWIS, I think you should refrain from posting in art thread when everything you can come up with is a picture of a sportscar and vague comparison between artists or art movements almost four centuries apart.

    !luc
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by