milk: does a body terrible?

Discussion in 'Health & Body' started by js4design, Mar 18, 2009.

  1. michaelp123

    michaelp123 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008


  2. Bring The Noise

    Bring The Noise Senior member

    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    I've experienced increased energy and performance since cutting dairy and wheat products from my diet, it certainly isn't easy to do though.

    .....
     


  3. Fat-Elvis

    Fat-Elvis Senior member

    Messages:
    337
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    This argument is just old and ridiculous. Humans are the only animals that eat bbq ribs, egg's benedict, drink champagne, smoke hash, watch porn, use condoms, etc.....

    Give a motherfuckin cat a glass of milk and see if he don't drink that sh*t up.


    Humans (some, used to be all), as well as all other animals develop lactose intolerance after infancy. Technically it is not something we are supposed to drink. Animals don't eat barbecued ribs and eggs benedict because they don't have the cookware and opposable thumbs to make them. What other foods do all animals actually develop an intolerance to? There have been studies showing why milk isn't so good for you after all. jlluch touched on that, funny how no one responded.

    Oh, and you're not supposed to feed cats milk for a reason.

    And yes you can get sufficient amounts of calcium without dairy if you have a balanced diet. Funny how the countries with the highest rates of conditions associated with low calcium consumption are also dairy consuming countries.
     


  4. FLMountainMan

    FLMountainMan White Hispanic

    Messages:
    13,935
    Likes Received:
    2,086
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Location:
    McAnally Flats
    I've heard the silly argument that milk (or rather, milk advocacy) is racist because certain ethnic groups can't metabolize the calcium.

    I read an article in a genetics journal about this a few years ago, lactose tolerance became widespread in Northern Europeans around 4,000 years ago (which is extremely recent in genetic terms).

    If PETA wants to get racist though, lactose tolerance also evolved (and did so much earlier) in a few tribes in East and Central Africa. It just never spread throughout the continent due to the lack of utility in other tribes and Africa's much higher genetic diversity.

    I also believe a few east Asian populations developed it too due to prolonged interaction with yaks.
     


  5. globetrotter

    globetrotter Senior member

    Messages:
    20,605
    Likes Received:
    390
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    greater chicago
    there are very good arguments against eating grain and milk - essentially food products that man starting eating after almost all evelutionary development was conplete. I dont drink milk, but consume a good amount of dairy, and consume very little grain products. I'm not fanatical about it, though. I think that all of those people who become fanatical and missionary about this kind of thing are nuts.
     


  6. Philosoph

    Philosoph Senior member

    Messages:
    1,143
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Location:
    The corners of my mind
    ^ +1

    Even if you're against milk, you don't have to throw all dairy out. I think I might die without yogurt. And having a little milk in your coffee isn't going to make anyone combust.
     


  7. Gradstudent78

    Gradstudent78 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    18
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago

    If PETA wants to get racist though, lactose tolerance also evolved (and did so much earlier) in a few tribes in East and Central Africa. It just never spread throughout the continent due to the lack of utility in other tribes and Africa's much higher genetic diversity.


    Those groups that lactose tolerance is high in tend to be pastoralist as well, where having tolerance would be more beneficial.
     


  8. Gradstudent78

    Gradstudent78 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    18
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago
    Humans (some, used to be all), as well as all other animals develop lactose intolerance after infancy. Technically it is not something we are supposed to drink

    What single food are humans "suppose to eat"? We are omnivores and pretty much eat whatever we can eat. So people can drink milk, largely because whatever population their ancestors are from decided that they were "suppose to eat" milk.
     


  9. why

    why Senior member

    Messages:
    9,735
    Likes Received:
    405
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Humans (some, used to be all), as well as all other animals develop lactose intolerance after infancy. Technically it is not something we are supposed to drink. Animals don't eat barbecued ribs and eggs benedict because they don't have the cookware and opposable thumbs to make them. What other foods do all animals actually develop an intolerance to? There have been studies showing why milk isn't so good for you after all. jlluch touched on that, funny how no one responded.

    Because those studies extrapolate information incorrectly and confuse causation and correlation. Like always. Animals don't eat barbecued ribs and Eggs Benedict because they're not humans and we are. And as humans, we can drink milk.
     


  10. ppllzz

    ppllzz Senior member

    Messages:
    4,315
    Likes Received:
    69
    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    i like milk, and i love ice cream. unfortunately, like most east asians, i am lactose intolerant. BOOO
     


  11. whacked

    whacked Senior member

    Messages:
    7,364
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2006
    Funny how the countries with the highest rates of conditions associated with low calcium consumption are also dairy consuming countries.

    Again, correlation <> causation. For example, sickle cell is a genetically inherited disease prevalent in tropical and subtropical areas of Africa, where malaria also does the most damage. Your kind of "logic" will deduce that they're twin sisters (one causes another), but in fact people with sickle cell gene is more resistant to malaria.



    A study covered by the NYTimes suggests that the ability to digest milk is something human acquired during the course of evolution. Cherish it.


    BTW, most primates have opposable thumb.
     


  12. unjung

    unjung Senior member

    Messages:
    6,561
    Likes Received:
    12
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Location:
    Madrid
    Milk is awesome.
     


  13. quevola

    quevola Senior member

    Messages:
    1,491
    Likes Received:
    10
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Humans (some, used to be all), as well as all other animals develop lactose intolerance after infancy. Technically it is not something we are supposed to drink. Animals don't eat barbecued ribs and eggs benedict because they don't have the cookware and opposable thumbs to make them. What other foods do all animals actually develop an intolerance to? There have been studies showing why milk isn't so good for you after all. jlluch touched on that, funny how no one responded.

    Oh, and you're not supposed to feed cats milk for a reason.

    And yes you can get sufficient amounts of calcium without dairy if you have a balanced diet. Funny how the countries with the highest rates of conditions associated with low calcium consumption are also dairy consuming countries.


    Ever hear of celiac's disease, food allergies to nuts, cherries, soy, etc? Humans develop "intolerances" to a lot of substances - ask Steven Adler if you don't believe me.

    Technically we're not supposed to do a lot of things, but we do. If drinking milk is the worst thing a person does, then that person is just a pussy. And any study that concludes that milk is bad for you is probably funded by some pansy vegan group [​IMG]
     


  14. korce

    korce Senior member

    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto
    How about the whole raw milk debate? Check out www.realmilk.com - has alot to contribute to this debate (though they are inherently biased in their preference for raw, unprocessed, local milk). I've never had raw milk personally, and it is illegal to sell it in Ontario (I believe - there has been a case going on for a while where a farmer is being charged for selling raw milk to locals in his community that wanted to purchase it directly from him, unprocessed). At the same time, a friend of my gf's in University grey up on a dairy farm. He has drunk raw milk since he was a child and can tolerate it, but says he would never provide it to others because it would make them quite sick...
     


  15. Gradstudent78

    Gradstudent78 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    18
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago
    How about the whole raw milk debate?
    Check out www.realmilk.com - has alot to contribute to this debate (though they are inherently biased in their preference for raw, unprocessed, local milk).
    I've never had raw milk personally, and it is illegal to sell it in Ontario (I believe - there has been a case going on for a while where a farmer is being charged for selling raw milk to locals in his community that wanted to purchase it directly from him, unprocessed).
    At the same time, a friend of my gf's in University grey up on a dairy farm. He has drunk raw milk since he was a child and can tolerate it, but says he would never provide it to others because it would make them quite sick...


    If this is any indication of their argument then that site is useless:
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by