• Welcome to our newest affiliate vendor, Passus Shoes. We are very happy to welcome our newest affiliate vendor, Passus Shoes. Passus shoes was founded by long term members of the forum and veterans of the shoes business. and is dedicated to crafting fine shoes in Budapest in a time honored tradition. Please help me give them a warm welcome in their new affiliate vendor thread.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Merkur Blades

Panzeraxe

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
300
Reaction score
1
I have always heard people praise the Merkur blades - what is so special about them, and how are they superior to the Mach 3's?

Thanks,

Panzer
 

bachbeet

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
1,212
Reaction score
0
Well, I did a brief search for these blades/razors. And, as far as I can tell, the biggest difference is cost. They are way too expensive. I'll stick with Gillette, thank you.
 

JBZ

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
15
Supposedly, Merkur blades are better made than Sensor blades or Mach III blades or [insert your Gillette or Schick razor blade here], and hold their edge for a longer period of time. They are also much cheaper. Also, there is no plastic involved, so they are environmentally friendly (to the extent you care about this).

I am a Merkur user. The main reason I use it has less to do with blade quality and more to do with the fact that double and triple blades irritate my face and cause ingrown hairs. The Merkur does not. Of course, YMMV.
 

JBZ

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
15
Well, I did a brief search for these blades/razors. And, as far as I can tell, the biggest difference is cost. They are way too expensive. I'll stick with Gillette, thank you.
The Merkur razor is much more expensive than the Gillette razor. The blades are cheaper than the Gillette blades.
 

Kai

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
3,216
Reaction score
811
I also heard people praise Merkur blades.

So, I bought a Merkur razor and blades.

They definitely are sharp, but I do not like them at all. I didn't get a closer shave than with my Mach III, and I got a lot more skin irritation. Even cut myself a few times. I stuck with the Merkur for about a month, thinking it would get better, but it didn't.

I went back to my Mach III.
 

Horace

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
0
The thing about Mach III (haven't tried Merkur) is that one changes them so often that it can get expensive.  I've read an article in the newspaper by some enviro-freak that it's possible, for very little money, to make a blade that won't dull as quickly as the Mach III does, but then the Big G. wouldn't sell as many blades.

edit: I don't know whether there's any truth to it or not, i.e. possible to manufacture "Stay-sharp" blade for very little cost.
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

How do you feel about spending money on non-essential goods during the Covid-19 crisis?

  • I don't want to spend money at a time of economic uncertainty, even if I could afford it.

  • I feel compelled to spend to help small businesses that are struggling.

  • I reduced my budget for non-essential goods and I'm not spending at the moment.

  • Not much has changed for me and I'm still buying stuff I can't afford.


Results are only viewable after voting.

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
438,524
Messages
9,451,130
Members
198,090
Latest member
Siectrne
Top