Dismiss Notice

STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Merkur Blades

Discussion in 'Health & Body' started by Panzeraxe, Jun 8, 2005.

  1. Panzeraxe

    Panzeraxe Senior member

    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Location:
    New York, NY
    I have always heard people praise the Merkur blades - what is so special about them, and how are they superior to the Mach 3's?

    Thanks,

    Panzer
     


  2. bachbeet

    bachbeet Senior member

    Messages:
    1,212
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Location:
    San Diego
    Well, I did a brief search for these blades/razors. And, as far as I can tell, the biggest difference is cost. They are way too expensive. I'll stick with Gillette, thank you.
     


  3. JBZ

    JBZ Senior member

    Messages:
    2,281
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Supposedly, Merkur blades are better made than Sensor blades or Mach III blades or [insert your Gillette or Schick razor blade here], and hold their edge for a longer period of time. They are also much cheaper. Also, there is no plastic involved, so they are environmentally friendly (to the extent you care about this).

    I am a Merkur user. The main reason I use it has less to do with blade quality and more to do with the fact that double and triple blades irritate my face and cause ingrown hairs. The Merkur does not. Of course, YMMV.
     


  4. JBZ

    JBZ Senior member

    Messages:
    2,281
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    The Merkur razor is much more expensive than the Gillette razor. The blades are cheaper than the Gillette blades.
     


  5. Kai

    Kai Senior member

    Messages:
    3,207
    Likes Received:
    800
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2003
    I also heard people praise Merkur blades.

    So, I bought a Merkur razor and blades.

    They definitely are sharp, but I do not like them at all. I didn't get a closer shave than with my Mach III, and I got a lot more skin irritation. Even cut myself a few times. I stuck with the Merkur for about a month, thinking it would get better, but it didn't.

    I went back to my Mach III.
     


  6. Horace

    Horace Senior member

    Messages:
    1,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    The thing about Mach III (haven't tried Merkur) is that one changes them so often that it can get expensive.  I've read an article in the newspaper by some enviro-freak that it's possible, for very little money, to make a blade that won't dull as quickly as the Mach III does, but then the Big G. wouldn't sell as many blades.

    edit: I don't know whether there's any truth to it or not, i.e. possible to manufacture "Stay-sharp" blade for very little cost.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by