1. In 2018. by way of thanks for being a part of this community, we'll be choosing 16 active members of our community at random to receive a special gift and a gift certificate for one of our affiliate vendors, to represent each of our 16 years.

    Fok and the Styleforum Team

    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice

STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Meritless lawsuit of the month

Discussion in 'Entertainment, Culture, and Sports' started by Ambulance Chaser, May 2, 2005.

  1. Ambulance Chaser

    Ambulance Chaser Distinguished Member

    Messages:
    9,991
    Likes Received:
    1,117
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2002
    Location:
    Washington, D.C.


  2. itzamazing

    itzamazing Senior Member

    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Agreed, but what I found interesting was:

    I'm no legal eagle and didn't know this. Of course, a man shouldn't be cavorting with a married woman, but to have no claim at all....interesting...so basically he has no recourse here?
     


  3. retronotmetro

    retronotmetro Distinguished Member

    Messages:
    1,645
    Likes Received:
    27
    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    In many states the "marital presumption" regarding the husband's fatherhood is conclusive--i.e. cannot be challenged even if you have credible evidence to the contrary.  I watched an oral argument one time where a woman's lover sneaked out her child for a DNA test, then tried to get custodial rights over the objections of her by-then-estranged-husband, using the DNA results.  The court's basic position seemed to be "tough luck, dude--you knew she was married when you knocked her up."

    On the subject of the golfer/caddy case, it brings to mind a recent case I read about where a man had unprotected oral sex with a woman, who then used the ejaculate to inseminate and impregnate herself.  The court applied property law concepts to the case and held that the man had provided the woman with a "gift" and could not control her subsequent use of said gift.  I believe the court tagged the guy with child support obligations but held that he was free to pursue an emotional distress claim against the woman.
     


  4. j

    j (stands for Jerk) Admin

    Messages:
    14,914
    Likes Received:
    93
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2002
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    ...
     


  5. ken

    ken Banned by Request

    Messages:
    2,196
    Likes Received:
    79
    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2002
    Location:
    Chicago
    (retronotmetro @ May 02 2005,16:43) On the subject of the golfer/caddy case, it brings to mind a recent case I read about where a man had unprotected oral sex with a woman, who then used the ejaculate to inseminate and impregnate herself. Â The court applied property law concepts to the case and held that the man had provided the woman with a "gift" and could not control her subsequent use of said gift. Â I believe the court tagged the guy with child support obligations but held that he was free to pursue an emotional distress claim against the woman.
    ...
    Silver is for 25th, gold for 50th... which is the semen anniversary, again?
     


  6. Cliff

    Cliff Senior Member

    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Location:
    MA
    Maybe he just misunderstood when she said to sit back and take a load off.
     


  7. Mr Checks

    Mr Checks Senior Member

    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    No lawsuit lacks merit if the lawyers get paid [​IMG]
     


  8. faustian bargain

    faustian bargain Distinguished Member

    Messages:
    2,523
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Location:
    Bay Area
    (j @ May 02 2005,19:10)
    On the subject of the golfer/caddy case, it brings to mind a recent case I read about where a man had unprotected oral sex with a woman, who then used the ejaculate to inseminate and impregnate herself. Â The court applied property law concepts to the case and held that the man had provided the woman with a "gift" and could not control her subsequent use of said gift. Â I believe the court tagged the guy with child support obligations but held that he was free to pursue an emotional distress claim against the woman.
    ...
    Silver is for 25th, gold for 50th... which is the semen anniversary, again?
    3, 4...7 tops.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by